>>717463451
I'll engage in a limited way with your bad-faith argument: You're making a claim (the initial claim in this conversation) that they're not sentient, despite them behaving just as "real" sentient humans do. You claim they're chatbot AIs. You claim they have no free will. What do you support these claims with? The burden is on you, as the first to make a claim. Any request instead that I prove the opposite of your argument will be accepted as your concession. You may also cope and seethe, if you wish.