>as fascists
Not just them.
Entire west (including /pol/) is *trapped* by IDpol since 2012
>muh rayyyyy-AAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY-ce
Just the way they want it, to stay.
4chan Search
32 results for "ba9b31aef46616a0b898b914b4ff15d9"
>>520692142
>Latvia flag sub-60-IQ 3 pbtid
Fuck (You) midwit. Get raped
Nothing about this OP topic is even comprehensible to (You)
>Latvia flag sub-60-IQ 3 pbtid
Fuck (You) midwit. Get raped
Nothing about this OP topic is even comprehensible to (You)
>>520689613
/pol/ has been derailed and brigade-shilled into IDpol after 2017
part of a longer term globalist+Zionist+investment banks project
>'muh rayyy-aaaaaa-aaaaaaa-C-eeeeeeeeeeee'
/pol/ has been derailed and brigade-shilled into IDpol after 2017
part of a longer term globalist+Zionist+investment banks project
>'muh rayyy-aaaaaa-aaaaaaa-C-eeeeeeeeeeee'
Reminder that culture war is a distraction and both right wingers and left wingers fell for it.
Chuds/lgbt are NOT the reason your life is shit
Chuds/lgbt are NOT the reason your life is shit
>>516099597
Its not about the person. Its the pivotal point. The left will be happy you died, even if youre just a random girl coming back home from work or youre just trying to respectfully debate ppl you disagree with in an open forum. As long as youre white.
So these two events combined in short period of time, made a lot of white fence sitters and moderate right wingers become radicalized.
Its not about the person. Its the pivotal point. The left will be happy you died, even if youre just a random girl coming back home from work or youre just trying to respectfully debate ppl you disagree with in an open forum. As long as youre white.
So these two events combined in short period of time, made a lot of white fence sitters and moderate right wingers become radicalized.
Enjoying the ride?
>>516001214
>>516001949
>protesting the banks is bad
This, and it's the corporate mass media enforcing these narratives
>>516001949
>protesting the banks is bad
This, and it's the corporate mass media enforcing these narratives
>>515168223
>leftism
It's really the technocracy. That is what it has morphed specifically organization-wise into, during the post-Ted era 21st century.
"Leftism" no longer exists. The former 'leftists' of the 1950s-60s-70s-80s-90s have become the Authoritarian Statists / globalists of today. They *are* the establisment now
the activist groups that supposedly 'represent' leftism, today in 2025, such as for example antifa (which back in 1999 Seattle was violently opposed to globalism + corporations) are completely corporate-aligned. Tables have truly flipped, meaning of 'left' back when TK wrote the manifesto is no longer applicable
>leftism
It's really the technocracy. That is what it has morphed specifically organization-wise into, during the post-Ted era 21st century.
"Leftism" no longer exists. The former 'leftists' of the 1950s-60s-70s-80s-90s have become the Authoritarian Statists / globalists of today. They *are* the establisment now
the activist groups that supposedly 'represent' leftism, today in 2025, such as for example antifa (which back in 1999 Seattle was violently opposed to globalism + corporations) are completely corporate-aligned. Tables have truly flipped, meaning of 'left' back when TK wrote the manifesto is no longer applicable
>>214620565
Social relations are meaningless without shared labor and wealth. There's 0 reason to push woke, it demonstrably does nothing but radicalize people. There's no virtually no organic support outside of the extremely mentally ill, the rise of conservatism in the west is purely a reaction to it. It does nothing to society, it's not widespread, it hasn't even been prominent for a decade. The only thing it does is reduce political activism to cultural activism, it completely defanged the left by flooding it with retards. There's been almost no instance of it being taken seriously on a social level, it's almost entirely isolated to academia.
Social relations are meaningless without shared labor and wealth. There's 0 reason to push woke, it demonstrably does nothing but radicalize people. There's no virtually no organic support outside of the extremely mentally ill, the rise of conservatism in the west is purely a reaction to it. It does nothing to society, it's not widespread, it hasn't even been prominent for a decade. The only thing it does is reduce political activism to cultural activism, it completely defanged the left by flooding it with retards. There's been almost no instance of it being taken seriously on a social level, it's almost entirely isolated to academia.
>>515025528
you dumb fucking NIGGER
you dumb fucking NIGGER
>>514928916
In China bankers are below government, in America bankers are the government
In China bankers are below government, in America bankers are the government
>>514854038
here's the actual OP graphic
here's the actual OP graphic
>>514767894
Yeah, the middle management for the real power. The BIS.
Yeah, the middle management for the real power. The BIS.
>OP memeflag 'culture war slop'
That's what (You), memeflag, want everyone obsessed with by incessanly carpet bombing this board with Slop'topics' such as this
That's what (You), memeflag, want everyone obsessed with by incessanly carpet bombing this board with Slop'topics' such as this
>>513619338
I have heard people refer to gamergate and nu-conservative talking heads (typically Breitbart affiliated) as grifters almost continually since this started in 2014-2015. If these people's careers revolve entirely around reaction to sjw/woke/feminism/DEI/etc wouldn't they have the most incentive to continue propagating the idea of a cultural threat? Asmon tried to drum up some controversy and recreate gamergate with Sweet Baby Inc. but nothing ever happened with it, the narrative revolved around a fed agency that was acting like a caricature of progressive culture. Even the original sjw freakouts were originally headed by actors like Shia Labeouf, more people voted Trump the first time because of things like 'he will not divide us'. There's some kind dialectic going on here, there's far more incentive for these people to start fires then put them out for fame.
I have heard people refer to gamergate and nu-conservative talking heads (typically Breitbart affiliated) as grifters almost continually since this started in 2014-2015. If these people's careers revolve entirely around reaction to sjw/woke/feminism/DEI/etc wouldn't they have the most incentive to continue propagating the idea of a cultural threat? Asmon tried to drum up some controversy and recreate gamergate with Sweet Baby Inc. but nothing ever happened with it, the narrative revolved around a fed agency that was acting like a caricature of progressive culture. Even the original sjw freakouts were originally headed by actors like Shia Labeouf, more people voted Trump the first time because of things like 'he will not divide us'. There's some kind dialectic going on here, there's far more incentive for these people to start fires then put them out for fame.
Yes the topic is correct.
This should be the *ONLY* topic that /pol/ ever discusses, at all.
This should be the *ONLY* topic that /pol/ ever discusses, at all.
Greed is always natural and there but has to be culturally contained to avoid destruction
Greed grows and grows and grows until it becomes fatal to an economic system and to a society. As the Bible states, "The love of money is the root of every kind of evil."
Of course, greed is always in the background and there are always greedy people. Healthier societies control people's bad impulses and tendencies, including greed, but others too like infidelity, violence or aggression, and all the other negative traits that cause interpersonal damage.
Just a few decades ago, prices were set somewhat above the production cost per product or service, allowing businesses to make a tidy profit and consumers to have more purchasing power. That has changed. Now, pricing is determined based on how much consumers will bear to spend on a product or service. That change indicates a large increase in the amount of greed that society will tolerate without reining it in.
Since the 1980s, greed has not only become morally permissible, but even morally good or desirable as a trait to have and to act by. So society's brakes against green were not only disabled, but the gas pedal has also been stomped to the floor.
How do you fix this? Well, that requires a profound change in values and thinking that concern how people relate to one another and treat one another, basically, a major social and cultural change is required.
No idea how to pull that off
Christianity did a good job of it during the Christianization of Europe, and it took centuries for Christian ethics to become the norm in Europe, including castigation of greed and anti-usury laws.
It might take a dark age and the conquest of society by a new religion to change our trajectory.
Of course, greed is always in the background and there are always greedy people. Healthier societies control people's bad impulses and tendencies, including greed, but others too like infidelity, violence or aggression, and all the other negative traits that cause interpersonal damage.
Just a few decades ago, prices were set somewhat above the production cost per product or service, allowing businesses to make a tidy profit and consumers to have more purchasing power. That has changed. Now, pricing is determined based on how much consumers will bear to spend on a product or service. That change indicates a large increase in the amount of greed that society will tolerate without reining it in.
Since the 1980s, greed has not only become morally permissible, but even morally good or desirable as a trait to have and to act by. So society's brakes against green were not only disabled, but the gas pedal has also been stomped to the floor.
How do you fix this? Well, that requires a profound change in values and thinking that concern how people relate to one another and treat one another, basically, a major social and cultural change is required.
No idea how to pull that off
Christianity did a good job of it during the Christianization of Europe, and it took centuries for Christian ethics to become the norm in Europe, including castigation of greed and anti-usury laws.
It might take a dark age and the conquest of society by a new religion to change our trajectory.
>>718125805
Tale old as time.
Tale old as time.
>>512954541
That or jew. Does it matter? It's all performative outrage from exploitative abusive narcissistic sociopaths. They have passed class warfare off as evil white racism for generations. These people are just bolshevik commissars under a different banner and whites are their current culaks. Niggers and forced equality are their modern shallow graves and gulags.
That or jew. Does it matter? It's all performative outrage from exploitative abusive narcissistic sociopaths. They have passed class warfare off as evil white racism for generations. These people are just bolshevik commissars under a different banner and whites are their current culaks. Niggers and forced equality are their modern shallow graves and gulags.
>>512775118
>occupy wall street
This was the actual *challenge* to Wall Street itself that began in Zuccotti Park directly across from it.
Occupy Wall Street was snuffed out (as an anti-banks movement) in the crib, a mere 3 weeks after it began. After that, a bunch of standard establishment left and 'progressive stack' orgs and infiltrators had successfully diluted penetrated and neutralized it.
It was the greatest challenge to the elite ruling class of the past half century, now diverted entirely into "woke" retardation. And also the reason why no one, still 15 years after Occupy Wall Street, understands what money is, how it is created, or what central banks are and what they do.
>occupy wall street
This was the actual *challenge* to Wall Street itself that began in Zuccotti Park directly across from it.
Occupy Wall Street was snuffed out (as an anti-banks movement) in the crib, a mere 3 weeks after it began. After that, a bunch of standard establishment left and 'progressive stack' orgs and infiltrators had successfully diluted penetrated and neutralized it.
It was the greatest challenge to the elite ruling class of the past half century, now diverted entirely into "woke" retardation. And also the reason why no one, still 15 years after Occupy Wall Street, understands what money is, how it is created, or what central banks are and what they do.
>>512444750
>>512463797
>>512442489
>early 2010s
>nearly toppled the American Empire
Correct. If it hadn't been strangled in the Zuccotti Park crib 3 weeks after birth by Wall Street banking ptb, corporate mass media and the D.C. swamp
Occupy *WALL STREET* was the greatest popular mass movement threat to the establishment of the past hundred years
>>512463797
>>512442489
>early 2010s
>nearly toppled the American Empire
Correct. If it hadn't been strangled in the Zuccotti Park crib 3 weeks after birth by Wall Street banking ptb, corporate mass media and the D.C. swamp
Occupy *WALL STREET* was the greatest popular mass movement threat to the establishment of the past hundred years
What are some games where you can distract smaller regular enemies and make them fight between them in confusion?
/pol/ - Question for everyone on /pol/: all nations, all political spectrums, all races, all genders
Question for everyone on /pol/: all nations, all political spectrums, all races, all genders
Hi!
So, I think it's not really hard to see where the main problem comes from, at least where to obviously begin: it's the people that directly control economy.
Sure, things like ideologies and stuff is important too but money is the more immediate thing we all have in common, we need it for everything, and there is a group of people that print it and apply the value they want to it.
Of course it's a very simplified way to describe it but in reality it is that simple: money is fabricated and an arbitrary value is decided upon it by other fellow humans, just like you and me.
So, the obvious thing is to at the very least question these people, right?
Well, people in USA (the de facto world superpower that directly and indirectly influence the rest of the world) back in 2008 actually started a movement called Occupy Wall Street, and the catch phrase was also very simple, and powerful and true: "we are the 99%", because, yes, that group of people that controls the world's economy is really small! They get vastly outbumbered, so it makes no sense that such a small group of people have this much influence over the remaining majority.
So, how can such a logical, obvious path of thinking and action got dismantled, seemingly overnight?
(Cont)
So, I think it's not really hard to see where the main problem comes from, at least where to obviously begin: it's the people that directly control economy.
Sure, things like ideologies and stuff is important too but money is the more immediate thing we all have in common, we need it for everything, and there is a group of people that print it and apply the value they want to it.
Of course it's a very simplified way to describe it but in reality it is that simple: money is fabricated and an arbitrary value is decided upon it by other fellow humans, just like you and me.
So, the obvious thing is to at the very least question these people, right?
Well, people in USA (the de facto world superpower that directly and indirectly influence the rest of the world) back in 2008 actually started a movement called Occupy Wall Street, and the catch phrase was also very simple, and powerful and true: "we are the 99%", because, yes, that group of people that controls the world's economy is really small! They get vastly outbumbered, so it makes no sense that such a small group of people have this much influence over the remaining majority.
So, how can such a logical, obvious path of thinking and action got dismantled, seemingly overnight?
(Cont)
>OP memeflag