>>509521168
Without even focusing on the discussion of inherent benefits of purity you have some major holes.
Firstly anyone with an inkling of intelligence knows and understands that past behavior is the greatest predictor for future behavior.
So if a woman has had a history of sleeping around and having lots of relationships, the indicators for her behavior for a long-term monogamous relationship is long.
Second is an extremely large topic that is society existentially apocalyptic.
Families effectively don't hardly exist anymore.
With women's suffrage and no fault divorce there is absolutely zero guarantee of a family actually surviving.
People and explicitly women aren't interested in being husbands and wives anymore, just long-term girlfriends and boyfriends that they can end with a court meeting.
So to summarize what you are effectively doing is advocating for example that will most likely result in a broken family we're the man will have state enforced lesser control over his offspring.
Children from this dysfunctional broken family statistically also will be less functional adults and more likely to fall into this behavior.
Also any concept that women choose for eugenic properties in their mates and that the offspring from this female choice is better for it is completely divorced from reality.
That kind of insinuation in and of itself implies a certain level of complete disingenuousness and misanthropy.
To summarize logically people should have families and reproduce, explicitly White people.
Past behavior is important, because it illuminates future behavior.
But families cannot coexist with no fault divorce and women's suffrage, only broken families and dysfunctional offspring.
