>>512330683
Sorry, I know I'm being irrational for thinking about all of these actual uses for """AI""" that have to do with controlling big groups of people. I should be thinking about AI robot wives, as rational people do.
>>512283454 >We can have abstract thoughts, it's not an either or deal. I'm not sure where you got that impression.
Looks like your rudimentary language model matched my post against the wrong rhetorical template. You are generating "thoughts" based on the wrong associations. Try again.
>that one retard who keeps (You)ing me dozens of times
Gonna add the tard's ID to the filter and check how many more times he replied to when this crap hits bump limit.