>>96907712
"Restrictions breed creativity" motherfuckers when I tell them they can keep self-regulating like they already have been if they don't want to play against endless 4c slop piles that have the exact same wincons and are 90% the exact same cards.

>>96393961
Don't act surprised when you see my next deck that doesn't need its commander.

>>96386074
Not really related to your post, but I always find it weird how people argue that bringing back tuck will fix the format when the top-level decks are all ones that function almost entirely independent of their commander, thanks to what's arguably the worst keyword the format has ever seen.