>>531794505
People can create decent slop by iterating and putting in a little bit of effort, same as anything else. Too bad its all drowned out by >the subhumans who discover they can click a button to get slop >immediately upload 200x gens of the same exact thing to the boorus >all using the default ai slop style with zero edits
>>509639843
That was generated by the local diffusion chads of /g/ with their $2k graphics cards
I only lurk there occasionally, but I've seen some shit...
Been saying we'd be able to make movies soon
But unfortunately everyone is too busy COOMING
>>105766177 >low quality
NTA but I like seeing what someone can produce with contemporary local models given some effort.
If it was just low-effort txt2img then I would agree that it lowers the quality of the thread.
>>713010807
logical fallacy not impressed
i-robot right, you missed the punchline, will smith couldn't do any of the things the robot was being accused of lacking. it was a criticism not of automation/robotics but moreso of a fear of technology and the kneejerk response to it. in other words, the human existential crisis faced by those who cannot do the most human thing and adapt to survive.
read a book retard.
