>>214320707
I don't see any problem with a film criticizing any group for the actions or tendencies or even stereotypes about some members of that group.

>>214303631
>yfw it's so fake that the only reason it's called 'blood spatter' is because the first faker wasn't able to spell

>>537919639
My scenario involves taking these characters outside of a narrative and simply having events occur logically.

That is my code. Harry’s code