>>24630179
That sure is a bunch of stuff you made up to feel better about your opinion. I referenced my specific role in the very specific department. I referenced specific statistics from a specific report with specific values and included the N; a report which isnt publically available. I can even tell you the granularity of disability or the breakdown by gender if you'd like. And here you are, lecturing me about what is and isnt my domain, because I sound like a prick and brought it up on /lit/, when at the end of the day this is the lynchpin for your worldview.
Data Visualization and themed qualitative coding isnt jargon, it says something very specific for a very specific job. The jumbled mess of a department name? It's because they thought the acronym SPRID was clever. I can tell you the minster changed while I worked there outside of an election cycle, that I was the only person without a phd in my department, that they use access linked pivot tables for the analysis because the data sets are so big they'll crash excel, and the building itself has thousands of people walking by it every day because it's right on the main strip of a big city, across from another government building disgusied as condos. It has a scan-in keycard at the elevator, a revolving entry door that caused me to spill a full coffee on my shirt, IT in the back right corner of the nondescript main floor, and a cafeteria in the bottom with its own parking structure run by Aramark that will fry you fresh eggs in a sando at a reasonable price. The nearest coffee place is second cup.
It doesnt matter what I say, and I have passed the burden of proof deemed reasonable.
