>>76518955
But is that a good thing?
Like, it is pretty clear that someone has genetics for a certain sport from a young age, like explosive athletes being good at shorter distances.
Sure you can train anyone to be explosive to an extent, but it is very inefficient, so is it a good idea?
Same thing applies to school, a teacher may believe anyone can learn with the right education, but this may not be true and very inefficient. The returns on this may be low, and the specific application the teacher has to apply can be a detriment towards the growth of more suitable (intelligent) students.
So of course, believe your willpower is unlimited, but I wanted to critique your example. A better example would be how counting reps would limit your performance. Or how you can always do more than you think. And even with these examples, is it worth it? Having a little more oomph, with very little returns, and with a very high "excitation" requirement. Building your life in a way that willpower is used efficiently (or not at all), is much easier Imo.
