>>17900786
You are arguing that because a poor home environment is a cause of "CSA", home environment can not be considered a confounding variable, or it is a weak confounding variable (you aren't making it clear which position you are arguing for). This is amounts to trolling because you do not believe in this argument (or you are retarded and should be regarded as a type of inveterate, hereditary troll).

Home environment has an influence on both the independent variable ("CSA") and the dependent variable (psychological harm/maladjustment), so it is a confounding variable, even if it were the cause of "CSA". The degree to which this confounding variable matters is an empirical question (not just a vibes question), which is addressed here >>17900643 and >>17900356. Rind's excellent study found that home environment influenced adjustment problems more than "CSA" by a factor of nine.

You are also purposefully not following along with arguments, are refusing to expand on non-sequitur arguments to make them logically valid, and have resorted to name-calling out of frustration.

>>17900833
>your bullshit to repeat the same old lies
Like what? I have a feeling that you're butthurt that the historical record suggests that the Celts practiced pederasty.

>>509557480
Those races are far more advanced than niggers, especially the Romans. The ancestors of modern Brits engaged in pederasty as well:
>So that in such a state riches will necessarily be in general esteem, particularly if the men are governed by their wives, which has been the case with many a brave and warlike people except the Celts, and those other nations, if there are any such, who openly practise pederasty. And the first mythologists seem not improperly to have joined Ares and Aphrodite together; for all nations of this character are greatly addicted either to the love of women or of boys,
-Aristotle, Politics

>Although their wives are comely, they have very little to do with them, but rage with lust, in outlandish fashion, for the embraces of males. It is their practice to sleep upon the ground on the skins of wild beasts and to tumble with a catamite on each side. And the most astonishing thing of all is that they feel no concern for their proper dignity, but prostitute to others without a qualm the flower of their bodies; nor do they consider this a disgraceful thing to do, but rather when anyone of them is thus approached and refuses the favour offered him, this they consider an act of dishonour.
-Diodoros of Sicily, Library of History

>>509557607
Yes, I made a mistake.

>>508916978
The passage from Tacitus refers to "corpores infames", which at most can be interpreted as referring to sexual passivity, not pederasty, and there are several sources stating that ancient Celts engaged in pederasty:
>So that in such a state riches will necessarily be in general esteem, particularly if the men are governed by their wives, which has been the case with many a brave and warlike people except the Celts, and those other nations, if there are any such, who openly practise pederasty. And the first mythologists seem not improperly to have joined Ares and Aphrodite together; for all nations of this character are greatly addicted either to the love of women or of boys,
-Aristotle, Politics

>Although their wives are comely, they have very little to do with them, but rage with lust, in outlandish fashion, for the embraces of males. It is their practice to sleep upon the ground on the skins of wild beasts and to tumble with a catamite on each side. And the most astonishing thing of all is that they feel no concern for their proper dignity, but prostitute to others without a qualm the flower of their bodies; nor do they consider this a disgraceful thing to do, but rather when anyone of them is thus approached and refuses the favour offered him, this they consider an act of dishonour.
-Diodoros of Sicily, Library of History

>>508917084
Most Muslims are Semitic. The jews have always strictly forbade all forms of homosexuality, including pederasty. The perverted jewish spirit is opposed to the noble Aryan tradition of pederasty.

>>24499216
>celtic -> roman
There are no written documents of Celtic people claiming that the Romans practiced homosexuality. Aristotle actually mentions that the Celts practiced pederasty, immediately after describing them as "brave and warlike", so he isn't saying it as an insult:
>So that in such a state riches will necessarily be in general esteem, particularly if the men are governed by their wives, which has been the case with many a brave and warlike people except the Celts, and those other nations, if there are any such, who openly practise pederasty. And the first mythologists seem not improperly to have joined Ares and Aphrodite together; for all nations of this character are greatly addicted either to the love of women or of boys,

There are several other sources which claim that the Celts practiced pederasty.

In Latin, the extant words we have which refer to homosexuality make it clear that there is no association between male attraction to boys, and effeminacy, but allowing other men to penetrate you was viewed as such. In Greek, there are fewer words, but the same is still true. The Greek written record also makes it clear that they did not view pederasty as being in conflict with proper masculine behaviour, i.e. they did not consider pederasts to be faggots, nor did they believe that the boys involved in pederastic relationships were compromising their masculinity. People often conflate adult-homosexuality with pederasty, to try to portray the latter as though it was looked down upon in antiquity in the same way the former was.