>>64196906
>>64197406
I know quite a bit about imaging and have been doing photo for the past 10 years or so. I was also in forensics, we and literally documented evidence that would go to judges with smartphones. They're absolutely sufficient for this task.
The ONLY thing I can think of that may be interesting for police are macro lenses, in case you somehow need to take a really up-close image that you for whatever reason can't take back in the lab.
Everything else is useless for evidence. Bokeh? Literally counterproductive. High ISO? Useless, shine a flashlight at it, it's supposed to be visible not look like a photoshoot. Different focal lengths? Completely useless for evidence.

>>536878796
"This hack kjh"

>>536768502
he isn't

Why are all of you so retarded?

>>536414919
>She wants to do more attachment work

>>536233315
not even trying to be mean, but it sounds like this game might be a little too complex for you. might want to stick to rivals if you're already invested enough to be whatever rank "grandmaster" is

>>715430542
Every time.

>>713946685
That's literally the brownest board though.