>>149684775
Not him, but go after the named groups instad of some random leftist faggot like me on 4chan, Jesuth Christ, Mithter Garrithon

Some people DO NOT CARE.
Trans people, for the most part, DO NOT CARE because have bigger things on their mind like far right retards and extremist feminists trying to stop them from existing and dressing it up as protecting the kids.

You know, like the collective shout retards were doing. And have basically deplatformed a load of gay or trans-catering games in the process. And that is why you should care about their right to express themselves because moralfags will try and stop you as well as them, even doing so by default. Because moralfags are just that; they don't have morals, they just turn morals into faggotry. There are a lot of left wing people on this site despite what some lleft wing pressure groups may say, and they don't like all of them.

Caring about people and leaving them /b/e? That's morals.

I don't mean to rant you but Good Lord son, use your loaf.

>>149488005
Yes, beanmouth is stupid, but so are you.

OP. I don't know if you're a lefty who's angry at him for not living up to your personal and narrow expecations of anti-capitalism, or the worse alternative that you just hate him. Or if you're a rightoid who is upset at him for not living up to your ideas of anti-globalism as seen through this narrow criteria of 'art', or worse, you don't care, and just want to do a gotcha on a lefty.

Either way, this is 4chan, everyone's an edgy dickhead who spouts the same nasty childish pseudobabble so I can't tell.

What I can tell is: he's poking fun at someone for making a bigger deal about, that's not the same as defending it, and you're choosing to twist it to fit some them-versus-us narrative based on absolutism.

Either that or you can't fucking read. But hey, you use twitter, either is possible.

>>149448442
They might be screaming that it is sexual, but you are still agreeing that it is sexual.

It is a dog.
Dogs have balls.
Neutering is a thing.
It might be rude.
But it is not sexual.

Now all of you calm down before I get a bucket of cold water.

>>96114898
>gatekeepers
not to mention a lot of the people who claim to fight against gatekeepers want to enforce their own spin, be it old or new, without any flexibility whatsoever.

That's boomer and zoomer, both ways.

If I want to say female space marines are not canon and it annoys me they breached it, that's my wish. If I say I don't mind female marines in itself and I'm gonna have a female captain, that's my wish. If I say there's more important examples of retcon that are worth getting angry about that's my wish too.

I am not part of any 'problem' and I will not tolerate being accused as such because I will not kowtow to your side of a pop-culture pissing match. Either come here to have fun and play, or fuck off.