>>528040989
and you dont define it either, but i can garuntee the general portion of otakus aren't into lolis, despite it being a MASSIVE part of the community
>not trying to get away from lolis, pointing out that loliposting is inherently degenrate because it always inches closer and closer to inarguably child-aged and not child-adjacent looking
i can't believe im still responding to a tourist like yourself who thinks otaku=/=loli
its just one part, and the otaku community wholesale recognizes it as a taboo topic outside of seaniggers who think the age of consent should be 13 agian.
>like yourself