>>151841816
Why logos look like AI slop?
>>151841881
This logo is way better.
4chan Search
8 results for "e56358f67740d1c806d867d09a91a995"
I dont know who any of Ali's goons are
>>213623092
anon... in a lot of stories you're meant to simply imagine yourself being one of the characters which accomplishes the same thing.
... you do insert yourself into the story, right? you don't just passively watch what unfolds in front of you as if you were a member of some otherwordly audience... r-right?
anon... in a lot of stories you're meant to simply imagine yourself being one of the characters which accomplishes the same thing.
... you do insert yourself into the story, right? you don't just passively watch what unfolds in front of you as if you were a member of some otherwordly audience... r-right?
ive seen at least 20 episodes of this show and i swear half of them were centered around giant or tiny people/aliens. was serling just using the show to play out some kind of fetish?
>>24573771
see you're just a retarded tranny off his meds, one can't have any sort of discussion with your ilk, go cut, you're getting a bit emotional.
see you're just a retarded tranny off his meds, one can't have any sort of discussion with your ilk, go cut, you're getting a bit emotional.
>>24571138
Post something Nietzschean from it then. Also not beating the ESL allegations, you missed an s >>24571150
Post something Nietzschean from it then. Also not beating the ESL allegations, you missed an s >>24571150
>>24532381
what is this? your homework?
what is this? your homework?
>>24531717
> it should also accessible enough to communicate the core concepts effectively.
making most concepts "accessible" impedes the effective communication of their complexity. You're acting as if philosophers use words in a superfluous way, they don't. Change one word by trying to make a concept accessible and you fall into the mess of losing meaning and nuance. Anyways, philosophy was never meant to be accessible. You are still a retarded nigger.
> it should also accessible enough to communicate the core concepts effectively.
making most concepts "accessible" impedes the effective communication of their complexity. You're acting as if philosophers use words in a superfluous way, they don't. Change one word by trying to make a concept accessible and you fall into the mess of losing meaning and nuance. Anyways, philosophy was never meant to be accessible. You are still a retarded nigger.