>>11958081
But try capturing it when it's green and distorted, anon. It's somewhat legible when it's white on my end too.
>>11958085
I'm sorry that actual hardware looks "really bad" to you. You're confirmed contrarian and mentally ill.

>>11858506
You don't actually believe that guy's screenshot is the worst example of scanlines ever, right?

Calling everyone else a zoomer is not an argument. Learn what TVL is. Also your dogshit cheap consumer TV still feature scanlines, they're just masked by the low TVL.