>>212972961
>In the 90s if they made 100 new movies in a year, 1 of them might be memorable or have a great line or character. Now they make 70 reboots/remakes and 30 new movies so the odds of something memorable being created is very low.
More likely:
there were 100 talents back then, and 1000 movie were made. The odds of enough talents getting together in a single project was relatively high
there are still 100 talents now, but 100000 movies are made, and the best scenario is you get 1 talent in your movie, drowned in a sea of monkeys
Numbers are random obviously, but you get the point
There is also the fact that the industry now is incompatile with creativity and doesn't cultivate talents

>>149415685
This is my take too. The message shows jorel and lara as a loving couple, nothing in their body language or voice fits Luthor's translation.
Does jorel look like someone talkin about conquest, superior heritages and harems?

>>211731002
Gillian is a babe tho.