>>513644578
Wind has always been a scam its unsustainable even if we forget the fact it cant be used for baseline power, it literally takes more energy to produce, put up and dismantle the windmill than it produces in its lifetime, its net negative retardation.
Plus the windmill blades are unrecyclable they just get put into massive landfills, pic rel.
Completely not green retardation similarly how Germany's Greens are against nuclear which caused them to fire up coal plants which poison the air and be dependent on Russian energy.
Meanwhile neighbouring France is almost energy independent when it comes to electricity when 80% of their production is nuclear.

Solar is better but for large scale energy its still a meme and while it has gotten quite good there are no leaps on the horizon right now. Its still better as just paving building roofs and maybe make shades in parking lots for cars to go under, such unused space it can be useful but making some solar farms that runs profitable only because it gets state subsidies - retardation.

USA has plenty of natural gas which is very clean so doing wind and solar with massive govt subsidies to make otherwise unprofitable business profitable with tax money - retarded.
If you have to use tax money for something and I dont say you even have to - you should be investing it into more nuclear research because that is where the future is at.

>>512947350
50 years of european nuclear waste are stocked on the equivalent of 2 football fields in France. And most can be reused to produce energy. 50% of waste are medical waste and not related to energy production anyways.
Show me just ONE energy with that little waste. ONE !

>>40700438
Only when the last field is converted into a barely useful solar plant will people realize you can't eat photovoltaics. Green energy should be used to diversify but it can never replace other sources because it's too unreliable. Also not as green as they seem.