>>510261940
>There is no inherent value in being a christian, as 100% of the human population fully meets the requirement to be one,
no. if christians followed the original teachings and actions of jesus christ, they'd be supportive of projects that promote long-term social sustainability and individuals taking responsibility for themselves.
meanwhile churches have been ideologically infiltrated because stuff like responsibility and constantly reflecting one's own doings and its consequences aren't popular in the present time. blowing sunshine up everybody's ass was never true christianity and it never will be. in contrast: calling out the wrongs of society and doing something to right that wrong is christian.
>which also makes it incompatible with ethnonational values.
as i said before, only when ideologically abused for lefties and commies to use christianity as a scapegoat to promote their own filth in the western world.
importing impoverished thirdies isn't what a christian would do. a christian would ponder:
>what can be done to improve the lives of people in their home countries?
a christian would also abandon the poor to themselves if they refuse to help themselves and resist all attempts to sustainably improve their standards of living.