>>96407860
I am guessing you are the real seether here
You have been making these threads for years now, often using the same obscure sources to prop up your arguments, and the throwing around the same insults when someone disagrees with you
At some point you will just need to accept that no one on /tg/ shares your elaborate headcanon assembled from out of context novel quotes, badly edited campaign books, and hyperbolic statements from 10 year old White Dwarf filler articles
If you are seriously interested in trying to find the 10 other people on the planet that have invested as much time on their tau headcanons as you have, then you would be better off on reddit or trying to find some dedicated tau message board. But instead you just keep on making these bait threads and having the same arguments over and over again, and even lowering yourself to regularly engaging with coomers and off topic pollacks when no one engages with your bait
>>96404325 is right, the Tau are always going to be stuck in a narrative loop where they are winning more than they are losing, but never in a way that is relevant to the overall setting
Also, Tau lore is always going to suck and be highly inconsistent between authors because they are too irrelevant for GW to try and enforce consistency, and also they don't have a lot of the built in excuses for inconsistent power levels that other factions have (varying tech levels within most factions, warp shenanigans, unreliable narrators, etc.), and also they are so small that the few notable things the tau have ever done get retconned every few years by new authors while authors for other factions usually just write about a new war anytime they want to write something new.
