>>213741158
Zoomers experience life strictly exteriorly -- their conception of the "self" is entirely defined by what another person (or a camera) observes. To them, "watching a movie" is someone else watching them watch a movie. Since this is not typically possible, the closest experience is themselves watching someone else watch a film. Incidentally, this is why they always mess up what "POV" means: a zoomer's point of view is that of the camera recording them.
>>213741158
Because you chud bitch, I want to watch people react to see if they also share the superior opinions I have when it comes to the movie or show, which then reinforces my own opinions on the subject when it turns out these reactors also all share similar opinions and thus I know I'm better than many of you out there with pleb tier thoughts.
>>213741236
He's not actually as retarded as he looks lol. He's pretty weird in the sense that he can pick up on some very nuanced things while also missing some very obvious ones
awesome, a reaction thread
these two niggas and mr video are the only decent black reactors t b h
others ive come across like rt tv and everyday negroes are literally too nigga for movies. especially the former my goodness, i legit got pissed over their silence of the lambs vid.
>>213743399 >no goth or gyaru film streamers >Why not? It'd be free money?
Well...reacting (and streaming) are low effort jobs. The people who choose to do these jobs do NOT want to put in a lot of effort. Putting on Goth makeup is a lot of effort. Putting on Goth makeup everyday just for streaming for 2 hours is a huge headache.
when i see think of this kind of thing when i'm going to work, and i realize how much money women like this make just recording themselves watching something, i usually think about killing myself.
>>213741130 (OP) >reactfu
I don't want to know what this means nor do I care about the people that know what this word means.
I fucken hate you people for comng up with the most retarded uses for memespeak, fucken faggots the lot of you
>>213741237
I could watch all of Sopranos in three days anyways, lightweight. 86 episodes at 55 minutes. Skip the into and outro and remove commercials and it's like 40-45 minutes. 45 minutes per episode would be 2.67 days.
>>213746453
it's brown simps who are so pathetic and alone they'll watch content regurgitated through youtube and cut down to three second clips, just because some mid females are watching it.
I get the fascination of watching how other enjoy the same medium you do, but 90% of reactbullshit is pure simpery.
>>213741158
Sometimes I like to watch experts react and talking about whether or not something in a film is accurate. Recently saw one of a Drill Sargent going over Full Metal Jacket.
>>213741130 (OP)
Is there some hidden lore with these girls? They don't really have the most views or subs or anything but they get posted all the time on here
>>213747871
I love this sociopath's willingness to throw any female in his life's wellness into his pursuit of becoming famous
His wife, his daughters, his sister
Bitch is hot
One time I drunkenly posted "w are children" bc even drunk I didn't have the balls to post "women are children" and he took it as "where are children" bc he loves posting his kids and gave my comment a like
>>213748630
They're obviously actual sisters and they're just Christian. Nat has a solo channel and it's just her reading off scriptures. I couldn't give a fuck, she's Living Sex
>>213745141
As an American why do I find white โworking classโ Brits so much more tolerable than their American counterparts? I just often find our lower class white trash Americans to be sickening for one reason or another, often for several things at once. Is it because I donโt actually know any working class Brits directly so can treat them as some exotic English speaking creature with a funny voice?
>>213749982 >As an American why do I find white โworking classโ Brits so much more tolerable than their American counterparts? I just often find our lower class white trash Americans to be sickening for one reason or another, often for several things at once. Is it because I donโt actually know any working class Brits directly so can treat them as some exotic English speaking creature with a funny voice?
>>213743571
It was. >>213749007
Based. >>213749050
Read this. https://jonathanrosenbaum.net/2024/01/cutting-heroes-down-to-size/ >Iโll never forget escorting the late Samuel Fuller, the much-decorated World War II hero and maverick filmmaker, to a multiplex screening of Full Metal Jacket, along with another critic, Bill Krohn, 11 years ago. Though Fuller courteously stayed with us to the end, he declared afterward that as far as he was concerned, it was another goddamn recruiting film โ that teenage boys who went to see Kubrickโs picture with their girlfriends would come out thinking that wartime combat was neat. Krohn and I were both somewhat flabbergasted by his response at the time, but in hindsight I think his point was irrefutable. There are still legitimate reasons for defending Full Metal Jacket โ as a radical statement about what conditioning does to intelligence and personality, as a meditation about what the denial of femininity does to masculine definitions of civilization, as a deeply disturbing experiment in sprung and unsprung narrative, and perhaps as other things as well. But as a piece of propaganda against warfare, itโs specious, providing one more link in an endless chain of generic macho self-deceptions on the subject. The principal achievement of Saving Private Ryan is to extend that sort of self-deception into the 90s โ with patriotic and patriarchal slop ladled on top of it, but none of the strengths or virtues of Kubrickโs movie.
Of course Rosembaum is a gay jew who thinks this is a bad thing.