is OLED gaming really as good as everyone says it is ?

Even the screen on my $20 vape is OLED, might as well make my monitor OLED too. It's an OLED dystopia

>>714181558 (OP)
It only affects really dark games.
You won't notice a difference playing an FPS, but you would notice a difference playing a dark horror game.

>>714181767
>It only affects really dark games.
any specific examples

I got a computer with 1440p 140fps and I thought it looked marginally better but then I streamed to my oled tv (using an old physical steam box so the resolution and framerate are severely limited) and everything looked MUCH better. Honestly I'm shocked that resolution is such a hot topic for graphics discussion, though I guess its because the companies selling you consoles and gpus can't force you to play on oled, but the difference an oled screen adds is far, far beyond anything else offered nowadays.

OLED has the best colours, black levels, contrast ratios, pixel response times and HDR capabilities of any flat panel technology, these are indisputable facts. The downsides are mura (greys having a green tint, PWM flicker which some are sensitive to and burn-in, all of which depend on screen size, panel lottery and the quality of the manufacturer.

LCD's are inferior but they're also not going anywhere any time soon. OLED makes people (mainly third worlders) seethe beyond belief but its very obviously the next step in screen technology.

>>714181558 (OP)
I was on a 10 year old 4k 60hz monitor until 2023, and OLEDs are pretty good now, I am 2 years in and no screen burn in on my LG, and shits super fucking bright when it needs to be and the individual pixel lighting in OLEDs makes dark/black scenes look real good

I got my 48 inch "monitor" for $600 and I consider it worth it. if you live in america, buy it at best buy and get a geek squad warranty because that shit covers burn in lmao

>>714181558 (OP)
absolutely

>>714181767
wrong it affects all games because of the instant response time of oled screens. The perfect blacks are just another advantage.

>>714181558 (OP)
Yes
>>714181767
This is false
It makes colors vivid as fuck and response time/refresh rates are insanely fast

buy an oled and find out. you're not poor , are you ?

>>714181804
That one game where I fuck your mom with the lights off. You know why.

>>714183468
cope

>>714181558 (OP)
No you stupid nigger. You can play on any monitor just fine. Having a slightly more pleasing shade of fucking green shouldnt be your reason for buying a monitor. People like you are beyond retarded for asking shit like this.

>>714181558 (OP)
no because you can get higher refresh rates for the same price

>>714181804
NTA but I can't see shit in dark areas of cyberpunk

going from an old ultrawide ips to a new ultrawide oled hdr changed my life

>>714184229
>ultrawide
why are you gay ?

>>714181767
>You won't notice a difference playing an FPS
The faster pixel response time will be noticed the most exactly in a faster-paced game such as an fps.

>>714183676
This anon is married to SEA monkey and not a proper Eastern Asian that is a more pleasing shade of yellow.

>>714184306
Being able to see more environmental space = advantage, in many games. In games such as Path of Exile, playing at 21:9 means seeing the mobs when they're further away, and you have more time to clear them. There's a reason David Brevik said modern aspect ratios would be one of the tougher elements to design a D2 remaster around, and why Blizzard ultimately capped the horizontal screen space in D2:R below that of a typical ultra wide.

>>714181558 (OP)
yes. It's amazing.

Yeah but lately it's been all picross for me. Sorry 5080fe

>>714181558 (OP)
I went from a considered great IPS panel in 2020 to a QOLED (the samsung odyssey one) recently and its a fucking gigantic game changer. Way better contrast and colors.

>>714184698
Unless it's on a Lamborghini countach there is no pleasing shade of yellow.

>>714181558 (OP)
yeah it's basically the difference between viewing content behind a milky glazed window and it being 1:1 in front of you

>>714181558 (OP)
a good oled with good response time and high refresh like 240hz looks insane.

>>714186675
Marrying Lamborghinis is still illegal in many countries. It's 2025 and the world is still racist.

I use my c4 42 for gayming and movies

>99% as good as a CRT when it comes to motion and input latency
>HDR per pixel
>Extreme saturation in HDR mode
>So black you can't tell if it's on or off when displaying a black screen
Gaming on a 120hz OLED is comparable to gaming on a 1000hz LCD.

>>714183676
Retard, it's about pixel response times. OLEDs don't have motion blur like LCDs do.

>>714186969
No its comparable to a 200hz fast ips

>>714187434
No

>>714187094
Oleds still have sample & hold / persistence blur. But not ghosting.
>>714187487
You didnt say bfi retard downy

>>714187565
>Oleds still have sample & hold / persistence blur. But not ghosting.
Almost entirely gone by using 240hz. You can also do BFI to make it disappear around 120hz.

>>714183265
Wrong, it's still a sample and hold type display.

>>714187487
Post a comparison with a 240hz fast ips lcd instead

>>714187660
Here you go

>>714181558 (OP)
im still looking for a good 2K OLED monitor but sadly im not that expert

Some people recommended me the AW2527D but im afraid that i could find better ones with a better price

>>714186946
thoughts on burn in ?

if threads on here and steam hardware survey results are any indication most pc fags have shit specs anyway so they have no business using an OLED display nor could they likely afford one

>>714188926
no problems yet on my pg32ucdp and lg cx 55

>>714187937
>>714187487
i love it when people discuss tech on this website and all of a sudden a select few autists pretend to be experts all of a sudden

>>714189853
You don't need to be an expert to know LCD has shit response times, people have been complaining about that for 30 years now.

https://github.com/blurbusters/crt-beam-simulator/

>>714181804
any game with night and neon lights, especially when it supports HDR

>>714190437
It doesn't even need to support HDR.

>tfw just got a job and going to save up for a new pc
32" 240hz OLED here I come.

>>714190437
not all HDR is created equal. some games have good implementations, some bad

>>714190865
>tfw just got a job
im jelly i cant find a job to save my life

>>714181558 (OP)
I upgraded from a 1440p TN panel to 4k OLED and it was the best computer upgrade I had done in a decade.

>>714190865
Make sure to get QD-OLED. WOLED is not as good.
The people who say QD-OLED is worse in a bright room are wrong.

>>714191532
I picked the asus PG32UCDM. Don't really see any difference to the MSI one and I'm not paying a few hundred pounds more for DP2.1

>>714181558 (OP)
I have an OLED slop screen and a dell ultrasharp for productivity.
They both have their uses and OLED screens are really nice for games.
I primarily play star citizen and it makes an immense difference for that game.

>>714184035
Turn off the raytracing.

Are you niggers really playing games in the dark that often?

Yeah, ask any Switch OLED owner.

How do you go back to monitors once you experience big TV?

>>714187937
Lcd wins

>>714192581
>he uses light
kwab

>>714181558 (OP)
>is OLED gaming really as good as everyone says it is ?
No.

>>714181804
Amnesia: the Dark Descent
Darkstalkers
Heart of Darkness
The Darkness
Perfect Dark
Darksiders
The Darkness II
Chronicles of Riddick: Dark Athena
Star Wars Dark Forces: Jedi Knight
NBA 2k20
And of course, Demons Souls

>>714181558 (OP)
>OLED
>planned obsolescence
average ips led or mini-led is way to go.

>>714193494
heh

>>714187487
BFI at 120Hz is actually drops refresh rate to 60Hz and causes noticeable flickering. You need at least 240Hz panel to run BFI which can get very demanding on hardware front (you'll need to run your games at 4K/1440p 120fps). Even then all you get is 240Hz motion clarity at half the frame cost. It's still kind of cheaper to get used high end CRT and play games at respectable 1600x1200 85Hz or even higher.

Oled is fantastic and people saying otherwise are legit coping. The motion clarity alone is worth it.

I'm still using a 1080p60 screen from 10 years ago
I play video games all day and I don't see the reason for a better screen

>>714192764
I cannot accept ppi that low.

>>714187094
>A little blur
People have been using non oled shit for decaeds just fine. Your little sissy ass making decisions over this is gay beta shit. Youre a faggot arent you?

>>714194317
OLED has the same motion clarity as LCD they are both sample and hold technologies.

>>714181558 (OP)
Yes it's great if your room is not too bright.
HDR looks insane on OLED and perfect blacks is great. Also fast response time and great motion clarity.
Burn in is a non issue nowadays btw.

>>714183913
only oled has response times fast enough for more than a basic bitch 144hz screen

>>714194663
No, they don't. Even at a mere 60hz an oled is clearer.

>>714194881
Whats the point of "clearer" if it's still a blurry mess? There is no way this is how it actually looks when there are anons in this thread claiming OLED has good motion?

>>714194881
>>714195601
as this image illustrates OLED and LCD have the same sample and hold blur at equal framerates. OLED however has better pixel response time which removes the ghost trailing problem LCDs have. This result in a marginally clearer image.
Saying OLED has better motion only becomes true in a practical sense at very high framerates.

is tha samsung 43 inch neo g7 a good monitor ?

>>714196551
>Saying OLED has better motion only becomes true in a practical sense at very high framerates.
Which is irrelevant as that can only be recorded with pursuit cameras and then slowed down as the human eye is limited to (about) 60hz.

>>714181804
Morrowind can get pretty dark

>>714181558 (OP)
OLED is awesome but the tvs are still overpriced let alone the monitors with high refresh rates. If you have enough money to not care than idk why you're even asking

>>714197176
obvious bait, but this is literally how it looks to the eye when you do the UFO test in person. Humans can easily see sample and hold blur all the way up to 1000hz.

>>714194880
you get faster lsds with great colors for a fraction of the price

>>714197680
Sure thing buddy

>>714197857
How do people like you even solve captcha

>>714197314
i bought a 55 lg c2 for $1200 two years ago and feel it was worth it. going to 4k/hdr, it felt like an actual generational leap in my set up. i even use my gaymen pc on it now. can't go back to the old 144hz 1440p tn panel i had.

i definitely ain't paying over $600 for a monitor though, so still waiting for the day i will get a 27/32 oled.

>>714197857
>in person test of the human eye
anon shows up with a screenshot.
Is the fluoride in the water supply responsible?

>>714197745
$600 over however many years for a 1440p 240hz entry oled is absolutely worth it
it's a monitor, you'd have to be an utter retard to cheap out on it, you're using 100% of its potential 100% of the time

>>714198057
By pure magic

>>714181558 (OP)
Nope, it's better. The clarity on my 360hz OLED is insane, and colors look better in everything. Plus no light bleed.

>>714181558 (OP)
It really is that good. Don't listen to the poorfags

>>714194881
how come crts have zero ghosting whatsoever at 60hz while even with the oled's sub 1ms response times they're still nowhere near as sharp despite theoretically being able to replace the background 30 times over

>>714197857
The one time taking a photograph of your screen instead of a screenshot would be the right thing to do. Hats off to you, sir.

>>714198057
The captcha is substantially easier now, after the hack for some reason.

I’m not sure if the original doom 3 is even playable on certain monitors without having to change your play style dramatically. I imagine condemned 2 being a really hard game to play also without the right screen or monitor. I think those were all made either CRT in mind and on a shitty led everything is grey and there isn’t enough contrast in dark areas to see where shit is

>>714198635
>Clarity
You must be one of those blind "see what you want to see" retards whose defective brains don't notice the fringing and flicker

>>714181558 (OP)
it really is
>perfect blacks
>extremely vivid colors
>instant response times
i'm never going back

>>714198756
>response times
as multiple anons have pointed out pixel response times does not reduce sample and hold motion blur. It only helps with reducing ghosting which is the smearing/trailing you can see after the UFO on the LCD UFOs.
To eliminate sample and hold blur you need to reduce pixel visibility time, either through brute force by increasing the framerate (up to and above 1000hz) or use blur reduction technology like backlight strobing or black frame insertion, which also reduces the pixel visibility time.
CRTs have this out of the box because after a pixel is displayed on screen it instantly starts to fade, reducing pixel visibility time. CRT motion clarity is only limited by how fast this fade time is, for CRT PC monitors usually between 0.5-1.0ms.

>>714199769
i assumed it was mostly as a power saving measure since the screen is still displaying those 60 pictures a second without ghosting just fine

I can't afford OLED

>>714181558 (OP)
Bought all the oleds, TVs, monitors, phones, spared no expense. Went back to LCD after 6 months. Maybe when true RGB oleds comes out the tech will be worth it. Right now its the worst display type you can get, regardless of financial standings.

>>714200654
If the oled was displaying every frame of the 60hz image for just 1ms and the other 16.66ms of that frame with a pure black screen you would have CRT levels of motion clarity. This is what black frame insertion can do.
Issue is this also massively reduces perceived brightness of the display and causes a lot of flicker. The only way to combat this is to have a brighter display but OLEDs are not capable of going bright enough for this to be a viable solution yet.

>>714181558 (OP)
MiniLED has better brightness and its black levels are equally "black" if you're not playing on a perfectly dark room.

Your eyes only have a certain amount of dynamic range so if the room has adequate light in it your eyes' minimum perceptible "black" level is increased slightly. Think of when you come indoors from a bright day for example.

I went from a 50" MiniLED (Samsung something) to a 42" OLED (LG C3) a couple years ago. If I'd known the difference would truly be so minor, and in some ways negative, I wouldn't have bothered. the MiniLED didn't even have local dimming

>>714201481
The brightness issue isn't the biggest one for BFI right now imo - the biggest is it just doesn't work work with VRR. IIRC nvidia claims they have some sort of vrr/bfi combo working with at gsync module but (again, iirc) that isn't in any product yet.

>>714201484
>its black levels are equally "black" if you're not playing on a perfectly dark room.
why are you just straight up lying?

>>714201484
went from a LG B2 to a samsung miniled qn90d and the miniled was so much better that the OLED felt like a scam product.

I only use emissive displays. Roll on microLED or QDLED for mere mortals (just 2 more years amirite).

>>714181558 (OP)
It's pretty good in terms of color and motion clarity, I have an IPS and a TN panel monitor next to mine and it's like night and day with the only major drawbacks being burn in and text fringing but I literally only use mine to play games, not for work or web browsing.

I paid $850 for mine on black friday last year and I'd say that's about the most I'd pay for a 4k oled or any monitor really.

REC 2020 is a scam.

>>714202170
people were saying microled was coming out when the first oled TVs were hitting mainstream like 8 years ago lmao

is OLED really that much better than Mini LED ?

>>714202510
Depends.
Do you like blooming and blowing out highlights? Get miniLED.

>>714202619
what if i play in a mostly dark room ?

>>714202472
Well if you are elon musk you can get The Wall for dat premium experience. Even the new ones technically suck balls for resolution due to how they are made.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P12_r-HWxRE

>>714202656
Then OLED is king no question. The human eye loves contrast and for that oled is the best.

>>714181558 (OP)
the only people who say anything good about OLED are people who havent used OLED for very long and shills. It has a timer on the very central point of the object existing. it's retarded and you deserve what you get.
>Man having a screen show me anything I want is great. I sure do wish it would break after 1-5 years of use!

>>714202656
you'll love oled

>>714202935
have you?
is it really so hard to drop your screen timeout, buy dark curtains and not peg it at max brightness?

>>714202935
>he doesn't live in a country where a monitor breaking in under 5 years gets you a new one for free

luv me oled
luv me renodx
>mfw playing ori with HDR on

so what's holding back 4k 360hz from existing
the displayport standard?

>>714203858
Mostly the raw horsepower to do it. DP 2.1 with DSC can handle obscene resolutions/framerates at full 4:4:4.

>>714198358
i'd rather get 360hz or whatever is the latest meme number over your 1440p meme

>>714181558 (OP)
I played Deus Ex for the first time in ages on a new (and my first) OLED, well worth it

>>714204539
you don't get a choice
4k oleds cap out at 240 for the time being

>>714205027
but muh 1080p 480hz doooooel modo

>stops brainlets and marketers in your path

>>714193803
I regret not replacing my last CRT with another CRT so much. They were already disappearing real bad but I thought that if the newer tech doesn't catch up quickly enough CRTs will just make a return. Fucking dumb.

CRT rocks
OLED rocks
LCD is okay these days

its impossible to play hunt showdown with OLED, you cant see shit in nighttime

>>714205956
>when crytek does proper colour grading and you need IPS glow

>>714205614
LCD shilling in the CRT days is rivaled only by the OLED shilling now.
CRT is objectively the best display technology and now because we all bought into the flatpanel meme, it has become lost technology.

>>714206312
CRT has limitations that you /vr/ fags refuse to acknowledge.

>>714193547
mini-leds are starting to pick up popularity thank god
I plan to have a mini-led in my setup to accompany my oled at some point because I'm an autist who sometimes likes to play one game for 16 hours a day 7 days a week and that kind of shit is a no-go for oleds

>>714206312
I don't even mind LCDs. They have their role. Much lower energy consumption is fine for something like office work and smaller volume can be good too. Even TN film isn't atrocious now like it was in the beginning.
Are they not manufactured at all anymore or is it just a trickle of safe and not particularly attractive models? I remember them still being made for graphics designers or something to that effect years ago. But the larger ones cost easily 3 times the highest quality LCDs you could get.

>>714199443
Fringing is all but gone on new models, and while VRR flicker is annoying, it's not a thing in most scenes. You sound like an angry retard that talks about things he reads online and then pretends to be an expert on despite having objectively 0 experience with and even less technical understanding of. If you want another reply, prove you actually own an OLED. I have an OLED monitor and several LCD monitors so I'm qualified to talk about how the response times and individual pixel control blows LCD out of the water in terms of clarity. If you don't own both, then you're a shitposting monkey whose opinions are worthless. No proof, no reply. Those are the rules.

I've had an OLED tv for about 5 years and the burn in from gaming is starting to be pretty noticable. There are basically health bars permanently visible on the screen.

>>714181558 (OP)
Yes. Ignore the poors with their sour grapes telling you about burn in.

>>714187487
>BFI
Bald Fucking Incel?

>>714207089
Based WoW player.

>>714206836
No CRT manufacturing line exists anymore, only a few companies that refurbish existing CRTs. In fact producing new CRTs would be illegal in most countries because of environmental directives.
Regardless, the the complexities involved in manufacturing CRTs is so big it is extremely unlikely we will ever see this display technology again.

>>714207879
Plus you run into the damascus steel issue where some of the knowledge to iron out the kinks was never documented and exists (or more likely existed) only in the heads of key people in the manufacturing chain.

>>714207879
But surely documentation must exist for everything. So it can be rebuilt in theory. All it would take is for a less retarded company to apply some of the newer technological discoveries to improve every step of the process. And countries aren't that much of an obstacle considering you'd have to start from the beginning now.

>>714187487
How do you make these comparison images?

>>714208135
>never documented
Highly unlikely. It might be kept in some vault but expecting something that was still that important even in the early 2010s to never be documented is unwarranted pessimism. It might get thrown out into the trash by the nu gud retards.

>>714208440
You would be surprised anon how many manufacturing processes across the world are "yeah spec says 8% iron but if you put 9% in yields go up by 15% so mix like that and i'll request more from HQ" and it never gets codified in official paperwork.

>>714194663
Which youtube video did you watch in the last week to learn that term?

>>714208276
Patents have all run out and the documentation is in theory there for the taking. Main problem is CRTs were made in the analog era and required a lot of manual labor.
A quality CRT is in a sense a fine tuned instrument. To build up the required experience and knowledge to begin producing these displays again would take a very long time and be unreasonably expensive.
The only way a technological marvel like the sony trinitron CRT is possible to sell at consumer prices is purely with the help of economy of scale.

>>714208665
That's bad if true in this case but not terrible. It would mean that restarting without such optimisations will not immediately get to peak cost-efficiency, which is a given anyway considering some of the technological advances discovered in the meantime will be added anyway, throwing everything off. As long as the specs allow actually producing new CRTs that match the higher end of the good ones (not the top ones) right away it's just natural "growing pains".

>>714209372
You're effectively start from scratch at that point.

>>714181558 (OP)
It's not, you need strobing or black frame insertion as a native hardware option.
Otherwise it's completly pointless due to sample and hold motionblur, which actually comes from your own eyes.
This is why CRTs will destroy even oleds because at the end of the day you're looking at the screen with your human eyes. The strobing that CRT or BFI induces tricks them into not blurring each frames together.
Leading to this, some LCD can destroy an OLED with 4x less ingame FPS in term of motion clarity.
I still love oleds because of the deep blacks and awesome hdr, and the instant response time do help a lot but ultimately the biggest issue with gaming displays isn't even something that most people even know about and almost nobody is testing or talking about.

>>714209290
We have fairly advanced robots now. In a few generations it will be both good and cheap enough for the large niche I expect it to fill. Obviously the majority will keep buying whatever they are told to buy by this glowing screen or another.

>>714205027
i meant 240+ LSD over OLED with pretty colors

>>714209475
Yes, but, once again, you also add every improvement made since. Some reduce costs, some reduce the number of necessary steps. In a way it's like revitalising rocketry by having things run on methane and using liquid oxygen while the entirety of the existing experts are highly sceptical. No, I'm not a fan of his but it works. And it was achieved by many talented engineers which were pumped and dumped so who knows what they'd produce if they worked in a healthier environment.

>>714204935
Old games with low poly models and nice texture work and no smeared AA look amazing on OLED. I've been playing a lot of Thief.

>>714209802
I have a 360hz 1440p OLED.

>>714209802
>LSD
are you doing this on purpose
literally no monitor with response times above 4ms is viable for 240hz and nothing called fast ips has that

>>714181558 (OP)
I have a VA monitor (I can't use IPS, it burns my eyes) and an OLED TV. The TV has a much better picture quality, especially during night scenes.

I am currently playing Death Stranding 2 and it looks absolutely superb on my OLED TV. It would honestly be a shame to play such a magnificent game on anything less than and OLED TV/monitor.

OMG do you anons hear yourselves NOBODY CARES if a screen has a 33ms g2g or a 1.0ms g2g - both are far below human perception. You lot are just masturbating over box numbers like the fools at audio science review.

>>714211248
fuck off tendie

>>714211248
wrong. These tings are 100% human perceptible.

>>714211482
Bullshit. If that was remotely true oled would've taken over the world and that has not - and will never - be the case.

>>714186969
>>714187434
You own none of these.

>>714211529
human perceptible does not mean it's a human necessity anon. A car with turbo lag still gets you from A to B.

>>714211248
>33ms g2g is below human perception
No.

>1ms g2g is below human perception
Yes, BUT a 0.5ms monitor would still bring an advantage of max 0.5ms over a 1ms monitor, in other words you could see an object or event at most 0.5ms earlier than with a 1ms monitor. In competitive gaming that could be the difference between winning and losing.

>>714212373
0.5ms isn't the difference between winning and losing. It's just the superior motion clarity which makes it easier to identify and track targets.

Have fun getting burn-in from fullscreen 4chin browsing.

>>714181558 (OP)
If I intend to play in a lit room or in sunlight, is it still worth it or just go for a good miniled? Also which brand has better qc? AOC vs Asus vs Msi>

What's with the display shilling lately? There was an HDR thread yesterday, now this. Go to /g/

>>714212770
Only buy LG monitors. Everything else is worthless.

>>714212671
I'm currently trying to decide between a mini led and an OLED and this is the one concern I can't decide on. I plan to use the display as a PC monitor while also sometimes gaming on it and watching movies. I use a lot of static content on the PC side.

>>714213296
Just buy another one when burn in occurs.

>>714213296
go for mini led

>>714205820
I'd use CRT if I could find a decent one for under $500, they just don't exist in my area. GDM-FW900 in questionable condition are literally $3k+. So QD-OLED with VA miniLED side monitor it is for me.

>>714199443
The only LCDs worth using (VA) also have VRR flicker.
You don't even need VRR if your refresh rate is >240 in my experience. Tearing is very minimal to the point I don't see it at all at 360hz, even at lower framerates.

>>714213296
The last decent 27" 4k IPS monitor, the Acer Nitro XV275K, came out in 2023. I use picrel on my PC so I can plug in either my IPS monitor or my OLED TV as needed.

>>714213697
>GDM-FW900
Those things are bullshit scalper sets. Just because muh best cuz internet says so doesn't mean other sets are not good. Too many people in the retro community - be it crts or old computers - focus on the best ofthe best rather than the good/decent that normal people owned. You see it in early 3d accelerators - muh voodoo outshines the likes of highly capable matrox cards which often gave superior image quality, albeit lower fps.

>>714181558 (OP)
yes, however it's completely understandable to shit on anyone that spends over $1k on a monitor unless they make at LEAST $100k a year

>>714201484
yes but you need a really high end mini-LED to avoid haloing (imo the ugliest display artifact I've ever witnessed by far)
and at that point you're in the OLED price range anyway so it's down to personal preference

>>714192764
TVs normally have a bad pixel arrangment for Text.This as well as being awkward to use on a table since its hard to focus on much of it at once or they are far away in which case the size gains have been lose.

>>714181558 (OP)
Compare it with the OG gameboy, and you tell me

>>714213296
>I use a lot of static content on the PC side.
Then the OLED is going to get raped. There are no ifs or buts, it's going to happen, it always happens on every OLED. The effect is cumulative in nature and eventually becomes visible, first only in certain scenes and then more broadly as it worsens. If you use the monitor a lot then it will happen rather quickly and you will begin noticing it, if you only use it very lightly then it could very well last a long time before burn-in is visible.

You either accept this and live with the fact that a well-used OLED PC monitor is probably going to last you less than a smartphone battery or you buy some sort of LCD, miniLED ideally so you get FALD and decent HDR1000 at least.

>>714181558 (OP)
just make sure you go for the apex predator aspect ratio

>>714214890
Other way round. The predator has a greater high resolution FoV. Prey can only see a few degrees with both eyes so they stick to 4:3.

everything looks kinda orange after a year

>>714215209
Visit red boards to compensate.

>the fishmen are already here

>OLED delivers the best HDR
lol
lmao
(this is from the highest rated OLED of 2025 btw)

>>714212770
i only ever have issues seeing my OLED if the sun is directly hitting my monitor, but then again my secondary LCD monitor isn't exactly easy to see in those conditions either

>>714215331
why do mulattos look like that?
are they okay? does it hurt?

>>714215473
you'll have to explain what the numbers mean anon

>>714215612
Why, to better see the 16:9 ratios, my dear.

>>714214828
Inconvenient truth

>>714214828
Only retards use OLED as an all in one monitor. I use my miniLED VA side monitor for everything static, but my OLED for games and media.

>>714215473
>anon fails to realise HDR is about the delta, not absolute peak

>>714181558 (OP)
It's the best we currently have but it's not as good as plasma.
Here's an incomplete list of its problems when it comes to gaming:
-Motion blur (this alone is a deal breaker)
-ABL can't be disabled
-VRR flickers like a motherfucker
-The blue LED's die quicker than the red and blue ones
-The overall lifespan of the panels is extremely short
-Burn in is possible depending on what you use your screen for
-They're absurdly priced, a complete and utter ripoff
-They still have input lag

They are really only good for TV/Film. They are shit for video games.

>>714205820
>front ports
>no SCART

>>714207302
watch your tone

>>714217284
Muh scart adaptor is broken yo.

>dogwater subpixel layout
>dimming
>horrific for productivity and creativity
>unaddressed and unfixable burn in
>cost alongside fixed lifespan
>panel preservation annoyances
>m-muh hdr meme
>m-muh glossy!
oled is irredemable consumerist trash pushed by consolefags and the misled. newer ips panels still negate the oled excuses. tn has its purposes. miniled is making progress. ultrawidefags get the rope too.
>/v/ - Video Games
hardware threads are pathetic

>>714209997
Goes doubly when the game is 100% black

i dont kno w

>>714184035
Cyberpunk doesnt have dark areas without mods. Lol

>>714188926
Tvs are less prone due to much better heat dissipation than these tiny monitors
Regardless i use wallpaper engine with 300 plus wallpapers on rotation every 10s and never maximize windows in produ or browsing

>>714181558 (OP)
yep. oled is pretty much end game monitor. gaming on a oled tv and its the best display i've ever had in years.

>>714215473
This anon is a retard and wants all games and movies to always blast 1000 plus nits into his eyeballs even at night

Meanwhile movies on avg hover 100-250 nits

should I go for a OLED monitor or OLED tv?
I don't think they were made to browse 4chan all day like I do with an IPS monitor so I would only use them to play games or watch videos/movies

>>714211994
>strobing

>>714208375
With a pursuit camera setup.
https://blurbusters.com/motion-tests/pursuit-camera/

>>714223047
Tv

>>714181558 (OP)
>playing counter strike on an OLED
like doing uber with a lambo

>>714187487
That's why I keep an old monitor for old games. Sidescrollers look like shit in comparison on anything other than CRTs.

That one guy alwats talk about strobing at 60hz 120hz buddy no one wants your flicker

>>714181558 (OP)
They must be because a small ass OLED monitor costs more than larger smart TVs.

>>714223184
That's basically OLED for gaming.

>>714181558 (OP)
Do they still shit themselves in a few years? Because I'm never buying an expensive monitor if I have to replace it in a few months, specially since I'm autistic about screens and I wouldn't be able to look at a screen with even a dead pixel for long periods of time without getting mad.

If you plan on using your monitor/tv for longer than an hour I would not touch OLED

between the eye strain and burn in OLED gives I wouldn't bother. It is like buying an electric car, some good features, but you are ending up with a fundamentally flawed product.

That's it, I'm buying that $20 CRT on facebook marketplace.

>>714223492
yes. it takes years but years is not acceptable for such expensive product considering even cheap shit LCDs last decades.

>>714223492
>>714223885
>years
it's months
they simply aren't good enough for desktop usage, or even gaming since HUDs will sit in the same place for hours

>>714223047
TV

I'm about to find out.

>>714223047
Go for a nice OLED monitor from LG. You wouldn't want to use a TV to play games, and they usually have a lot of bloatware.

>>714211529
Have you seen the phone market?
OLED has completely taken it over
The only issue with it is that it's expensive

>>714224380
>sony TV
It's over.

It’s even better.
It’s like going from riding the bus to driving your very own first car.

>>714221748
Me too

>>714211248
That's not how it works. You notice it because it's translated into ghosting, smearing and other kinds of blur. Grab something like a GBA and you'll see, and that's only a few milliseconds slower than modern screens.
https://youtu.be/Epe8U1PF6Ko&t=165

Actually, just grab a Switch 2 lmao
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/8j34r0278tpu830laplx3/ALR2w2qOumyvnf4sEyoMRhg?rlkey=tzun2pcu2i3m80ndsfq7lb1ia&e=3&dl=0

>>714224380
>QD
Your eyes are going to be blasted with a blue light emitter, these screens always get people complaining about headaches and returning them

>>714211529
It's expensive and kills itself in a few months. All the upsides won't make up for the downsides for most of the population.

>>714225651
Oh yeah people are complaining about their phones burning in
Get a grip contrarian retard

>>714225179
Picrel isn't a good example of blur. That's mostly the stroboscopic effect which occurs in all display technologies and can only be solved by having an incredibly high (well beyond 10kHz) refresh rate.

>>714225326
Only certain people. I use a QD-OLED all the time and I'm fine.

What's OLED?

I thought /v/ didn't play AAA games? Wouldn't those graphically intense games/console ports likely see the biggest difference?

>>714231428
OLED improves everything you do on a display

>>714231516
Even porn ?

>>714231596
yes

>>714197176
>human eye is limited to (about) 60hz
Swap your monitor's refresh rate between 60Hz and 120Hz. The difference is 100% obvious

>>714197176
And 1440p.

>>714197176
The eye does not work that way. It doesn't 'see' hz. You see inputs that your brain then interprets. I mean pilot testing, esports fags and military studies all show there is a pretty huge difference and people can tell and react. They may not be able to tell you EXACTLY what they saw, again the eyes don't work that way, but they can tell something.

1440p is the smart man's resolution

>>714233013
1440p invites anti soul gas into your vidya, 1080i NOT P.

>>714233013
its fine to go 4k even of AAA games if you got a 5070 ti type gpu, most of them will have an option to upscale from 1080p using transformer model

then outside of gaming 4k is obviously superior in every way

>>714181558 (OP)
Yes but there's a concerted effort from (You) making these shill threads and /v/edditors are braindead morons who will change opinions based off if ignorance out of spite for (You). I genuinely am an autist when it comes to colors and have been before touching /v/eddit, it's you that's pushing the normalniggers away

>>714233473
>1080i
go back to 2004

>>714181749
>vape

>>714235546
>old=bad
consuume

>>714237103
Interlacing looks like fucking shit. Not everything is a conspiracy.

>>714233646
If you're upscaling it's not real 4k. Might as well run 1440p native

>>714237996
sure if you're 3rd worlder who owns 5y old amd gpu

>>714238720
I accept your concession

>>714181558 (OP)
yes. even with my frame rate capped to what it was on my previous monitor the response time makes a big difference as does clarity. true blacks are nice since i play a lot of horror games. hdr is still a fucking meme on oled because implementation is dogshit 99% of the time

Is OLED actually worth it for video games?

Why do people support a technology where obsolescence is a feature

>>714242083
>obsolescence
You don't seem to know what that word means.
LCD is closer to obsolescence than OLED is.
Once QDEL comes out there will literally be no reason to buy LCD or OLED.

>>714242192
I was referring to planned obsolescence because they're designed to break

grafficks faggots lol Nothing beats 1080p with a 24 inch monotor 144hz. Imagine paying all that money for fucking nothing. Dumb fucking virgin losers

>>714242268
They aren't "planned to break". Are your car brakes "planned to break" because you wear them away over time?
Organic material breaks down over time, especially when stimulated electrically. That is an unavoidable fact of life. Until QDEL comes on the market it's the best you can get.

>>714242268
Thats actually not really what it means either. Planned obsolescence is more like when Apple has 2 different technologies to put into its next iphone, but instead only puts 1 of them in there because it is already planning to make that one obselete and release a second iphone with both technologies farther in the future.