>>715437386>That's the point, they don't but you're under the impression that they do and will follow things the way you think.No, I donโt expect everyone to instantly comply in good faith. I expect them to get assraped for shit compliance. They need to learn their lesson
>They will take the cheapest but highest paying option available to themThe idea of every single regulation is to make the desired outcome the cheapest option. This is the way every single fine work, cheaper to comply than to tank fines and legal costs
>whether that's selling their server software and putting drm in that or just selling a separate offline version.The point that youโre missing is that the purchased game should remain functional. Even if they initially find loopholes to sell you the same game again for it to function offline e.g. with dlc or some shit it is still better than having your game permanently disabled with no action you can take to play it agin. Also, it is not unprecedented for the EU and o assrape companies for bad faith compliance even if they comply on paper. See the apple sideloading case, they โcompliedโ over a year ago by allowing an app shop to go through some shitty next to impossible procedure to get verified as โapp distributorโ and be able to distribute apps on ios. EU pushed harder and now every eu iphone has an option to sideload apps from wherever the fuck they want