>>715568505
>but its been time and time again they dropped the ball when clearly they have a chance to take the reigns in certain marketshare areas
What realistically could they do though?
They had the clear performance crown with RDNA 2, and they produced RDNA 2 hardware in massive quantities (for AMD), and the only group that really bought it was Linux users.
With RDNA 3 they scaled back, made a top-end card and a mainstream card, and the top-end card didn't do badly, but it was overshadowed by Nvidia deciding to launch a data-center tier card to end users. Again, the only group that really bought them were Linux users.
RDNA 4 they tried to appeal to OEMs and focused just on mainstream hardware. Pushing development of FSR 4 from GPUopen to try to close the advantage Nvdiia has from purposefully degrading visual quality as a 'performance feature', and still the only group buying the cards are Linux users building their own systems.
What can AMD realistically do at this point other than trying to grow the Linux market? Windows OEMs simply aren't going to buy their discrete GPUs, and barely anyone builds their own systems.
>regarding linux, im sorry but there is no financial incentive for nvidia to go out of their way and altruistically support the development
Most AI development happens on GNU/Linux, and Nvidia does have the selfish reason that they are about to launch their $4000 mini ARM AI Workstation machine, and there is zero chance that is going to be running any OS other than a GNU/Linux distribution.
Nvidia more than most companies wants to advance to a post-Windows post-AMD64 future because they are the only one of the big 3 to not have the ability to produce AMD64 hardware.
Just a reminder that AMD didn't altruistically decide to support Linux so much as they just decided to start releasing the documentation for their hardware in a bid to get developer support. A bit over a decade later and they have arguably the best Vulkan driver.