Thread 716031705

Pocketpair might actually win this. Nintendo won't be able to do jackshit if they lose; they will either have to do good shit, or lose relevance.

Based. But the issue is that tendie mental illness increases and we have to live with that as a consequence

>>716031705 (OP)
>>716031819
Go fuck yourself, Eric.

>Pocketpair might actually win this.
Do snoys actually believe this? Nintendo has historically never lost a court case in its history.

Palworld lost and you lost hard.

>>716031705 (OP)
Snoy delusion is delicious.

>>716032051
It literally lost in America so they had to try 100 times harder at Japan

>>716031705 (OP)
Nintendies on life support. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=risdItqdh1Y

>>716031705 (OP)
Will Pocketpair be able to bring back Palspheres or riding on Pals or what the fuck Nintendo forced them to remove if they win?

You can't copyright an aesthetic.
All they need to do is use the parody is fair use defense, because it is.
As long as the actual pokemon aren't in the game Nintendo shouldn't be able to do a thing. I don't even care about palworld I'm just sick of jewish copyright.

>>716031705 (OP)
Reminder that this site voted 8 out of 10 whores from tendoslop for "best girl of vidya 2024" so I'm looking forward to piss in everyone's mouth here.

>>716032051
didnt they lose a case against some supermarket in some weird country just recently?

>>716031705 (OP)
It will be a fantastic day for the industry if they win

Lycanroc

>>716032051
>sheboonposting
You would get a permaban for this shit if I were in charge.

>>716032051
>snoys
obsessed

>>716032318
Yup and Nintendo will have to pound sand.

>>716032740
bsd

>>716032318
Who the fuck was even using Pals as a glider to begin with?

>>716031705 (OP)
All pokemon had to do was better fucking games. Thats all

>>716032749
Snoys are the only ones who shill this garbage.

>>716032834
Any Pokémon game is better than Palslop.

>>716032834
They'll never do that, because they know they can get away with making a game with 100 pokemon, copy pasted animations and no end game and nintendies and pokemaniacs will buy two copies, every single time.

>>716032889
xDD

>>716031705 (OP)
Realistically absolutely nothing will change if Nintendo loses the lawsuit, it won't change any minds at all because everyone has already made them up. Nintendo will not face any repercussions aside from whatever money they lost and maybe paying the costs of the court case that Pocketpair lost fighting it. They'll continue being shitty and continue abusing the legal system to destroy competition, heck they'll probably try it against Pocketpair again in a different scenario if they can.

>>716032808
They are an objective upgrade over the craftable ones, and i think they actually stack with them too.

>>716032671
yes. tendies are delusional

>>716032834
They never will do that

>>716032898
Not including that it’s literally 1 line in code that toggles the versions people pay for that shit unironically

>>716032740
You'll never be a janny

>>716031705 (OP)
I suppose it depends on how the costs pan out.
Aureal "won" their countersuit against the patent troll Creative, but still went bankrupt due to legal fees and Creative ended up acquiring the rights to their shit anyway.
>>716032834
Games are a losing investment. The paradigm of publishing in the digital age does not lend itself to innovation or competition, and has been effectively defunct for decades.

>>716032808
I was because flying is a garbage mechanic that ruins practically every single game it is added to. It invalidates every single interaction, map design and removed all danger entirely no matter what.

>>716033086
Those 100 pokemon aren't even NEW pokemon either, it's 100 randomly selected ones and you might get like 30 new ones and 10 are region variants. They really go above and beyond being lazy fucks.

>>716031705 (OP)
Nintendo's mistake was applying for the patent after the fact, then recently trying to edit the patent.
Its basically admitting that you're dumb and late to the party.
Still sort of expecting a minor win in favour to Nintendo though, Japan will usually side with the older, more prestigious company and Nintendos a 130 year old company at this point.

>>716031937
>>716032095
>>716032179
>>716032843
>>716032889
>>716032898
>>716033045
>>716032749
/v/ really did hit a nosedive if threads like this keeps getting made also how many of these threads are going to be made till it counts as an falseflag thread because pretty much all these people sound like repeating bots who only obsesses over a company that has nothing to do with the game

>>716032051
>Nintendo has historically never lost a court case in its history.
Kneel, tendie.

>>716033429
>how many of these threads are going to be made till it counts as an falseflag thread
When it gets more than donkey kong

>>716033429
Just because you don't like the truth, doesn't mean it's a falseflag campaign. What makes someone so brain broken that they support the big company that keeps giving you a shitty, broken product?

>>716032051
Sony doesn't own pocketpair you retarded nintentranny.

>>716031705 (OP)
Lmao. Nintendo is about to own the lives of every Pocketpair employee.

>>716033429
What's wrong, did a dalle thread die for this?

>>716033565
Did you beat your monkey game already and have nothing left to do nintendie? Why not play your racing game, you do have two games, don't you anon?

>>716033429
UH OH
STANKY~

You don't have to be a snoy to not like what big N is doing to Palworld and their other law suits. This is coming from a Switch 2 goy. Glad Nintendo might be repelled.

>>716033552
saying it's a shitty game doesn't make it a truth you dumbass just say you don't like the game and move and ignore

>>716032808
There are evasion strategies built around pals that have very high glide velocities. You are just that moran doing all the mining by himself.

>>716032739
>tomboy
>chest wraps
>huge tits

>>716031705 (OP)
Pocketpair will gain the rights to Pokemon once they win.

>>716033809
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mbv4b7yLgE you're telling me the last game wasn't a broken piece of shit?

Every time I see someone talk about Palworld/Pocketpair, and especially the legal case, in relation to Pokemon, it's always in some vague way about how "Pokemon isn't good and this will make them be good!!!" with absolutely zero actual context on what that means, like OP.

Like is that the whole thing here for some of you? "Pokemon is bad, so Pocketpair is based, if they lose this legal case, Pokemon will have to become good again!!!"? Is there any actual meaning behind what bad and good is here?

>>716033429
good morning saar

>>716033985
Competition forces companies to actually put an effort into what they do.

Assuda and Gamefreak can still sell shit ton of copies, because there's no other games that have a similar gameplay, and the impact Palworld has.

If Palworld lives, then Assuda will have to actually give Pokemon games proper time, or else players will migrate to Palworld.

>>716033865
anon i was talking about how both sides whenever there are threads like this being made and how both sides are genuinely more annoying than a 3rd party twitter user who doesn't know shit, but obsessing over things they shouldn't care about instead of enjoying what parrot that they like, i already said this before in a thread like this

>>716033985
People see what Nintendo is doing as legal warfare based not only on their previous behaviour with this sort of thing, but also the fact that they obviously couldn't sue for IP theft over the pal designs so they now appear to be resorting to very vague patents that they're intentionally making even vaguer after the fact in the hopes that they'll stick. This is backed up by the fact that many games that came before Palworld have either been all but copies of Pokemon like Nexomon or included these same mechanics Nintendo is claiming were stolen here (including Pocketpair's previous game), yet no legal action was taken until it actually became a potential competitor.
The people saying this will make Nintendo good are either mocking them or coping.

>>716032671
They lost to this. They were being unreasonable, as usual.

Eric thread, don't reply
Hide this thread and say goodbye.
Don't for it, it's all a ploy
From seething Eric, the evil snoy.

>>716034259
>they obviously couldn't sue for IP theft
That's literally what they're suing for.

>>716034795
Wrong use of terms. They are litigating on game mechanic patents, not copyrights of monster designs.

>>716034795
You're a retard.

>>716033429
Tendyboomers aka pre 2014 /v/cucks should stop seething. Nintendo is a slop company and if someone enjoys anything from it except for Xenoblade and Fire Emblem - the Image of VideoGameDonkey instantaneously appears in the mind of any sane nontendy man.

>>716031705 (OP)
>they will either have to do good shit, or lose relevance.
but enough about pocketpair

>>716034259
>>716034795
>>716035015
Using the term IP theft in the first place was always going to be a wrong use of terms. Infringing on copyright is not theft.

>>716034074
palworld isn't competing with pokemon
its a half baked ark clone

>>716035015
>>716035029
>>716035250
You are aware that patent IS intellectual property, right?

>>716035284
it's an objectively more entertaining ark clone to be honest ark is super boring and mods are the only reason it becomes enjoyable

>>716035329
Anon, you're talking to people who believe that a patent filed in 2021 was after the release of Palworld in 2024.
They don't even understand the concept of time.

>>716035250
No, it isn't. The initial shitposts about Palworld were about the artistic side IP theft, that Palworld was stealing their intellectual property either by using actual assets and/or copying designs. That's what Nintendo originally commented on when they basically said we're looking into it. This obviously fell through because they obviously aren't stealing Pokemon's IP in that regard, so they moved away from that aspect of the IP onto suing over Pocketpair allegedly infringing on a patent. Both of these things are IP Theft by definition.

>>716035096
Has it really been that long? Tendies have been a tender problem for so long that many current regulars here don't even know their original slur was and is still wordfiltered.

>>716035417
can you tell me what siding with either sides benefits siding with nintendo or pocket pair wouldn't benefit the spectator with nothing at all in my opinion

>>716035329
Infringing on IP law as a whole is not theft. The only theft of Intellectual Property occurs when licenses are used that aren't "Free as in Freedom".

>>716035329
>for IP theft over the pal designs
Is what I said. I am calling you a retard because you can't read.

>>716035596
thats copyright retard also none of them are legit 1 to 1 they are distinct enough to be they're own and we are using that one pal that cut in development

>>716033814
>manually mining at all
kek Don't talk, kid.

>>716035525
Now I'm convinced that Indians are shilling for Palworld because this post is just abysmal.
Anyway, I can just about decipher it and it's not about taking a side, it's about facts.

>>716033321
that's only if it's in america. In japan, nintendo did it by the textbook. Look up Colopl lawsuit.

>>716035738
First of all, you're running from the point. Second, you have it backwards. Copyright Infringement is using copyrighted materials without permission. IP theft is misappropriating trademarks, copyrights, patents, etc. Third, the exact terms change between legal systems. And last but not least, you're a retard.

>>716035284
Wrong. Cards and plushies are arriving. It was never about the games.

Why even glaze this game tho? Pokémon games are copy and paste and boring but Palworld somehow manages to be even worse. A bunch of random mechanics that no one asked for and temu Pokémon. It feels like a steamy game. Like rust or arc or something idk shit is lame. Incredibly ugly design.

>>716036010
ip theft is when you are using a like mascot of game and recoloring it while marketing it also im not the same person

>>716031705 (OP)
Tendo's clearly desperate by resorting to "uh you can't hold onto an animal to fly we invented that." They're just seething that someone ripped them off and had success with it.

>>716036117
that's called preference anon not everyone thinks like you do which is okay

>>716032889
>launch SV
lol
lmao

>>716034795
Shut the fuck up, retard.

>>716036212
That's not what they're suing them for.

>>716036310
Yes it is?

Interesting numbers of people became well-versed in Japanese patent laws.

>>716036124
Yeah, that's what I said. The initial accusation against Palworld was that they were doing something like your post IE Verdash. But more importantly to this discussion is the fact that anon claimed I said they were not currently suing over IP theft when I clearly said that they weren't suing over the pal designs, and that the anon in question is a retard.

>>716031705 (OP)
Whoever loses, i win. The meltdown from the losing ranbase will be of biblical proportions.

>>716036373
No it isn't.
They don't have a patent over flying, they have a patent over how they implemented a smooth transition to mounting in mid air.

>>716036547
despite me not liking both sides arguements im going to continue enjoying palworld even if it stops development due to the lawsuit im not really going care cause i can still play it i still think it has potential to bad pokemon fans rather play to same paper rock scissor gameplay and the monster tamer genre is derived from other genre besides jrpg or turn based but with gimmicks

>>716036224
But why's it gay? Why have such shit taste?

>>716036225
Based SV sends you to the heavens.

>>716036818
What the fuck did you try to say here?

>>716036842
You have to understand anon, gen Z kids don't have any opinions of their own. They just follow the herd and if the herd likes palworld then so do they.

>>716036951
i just forgot to put my commas that's why it doesn't make no sense

>>716036842
>shit taste
you're still not understanding what preference means also it counts as an opinion

>>716037038
The lack of commas clearly isn't the issue here.

>>716036998
so basically, the whole lawsuit thing about the lawsuit that you must hate nintendo/gamefreak or pocketpair/palword because that more of herd thing than what i told that retard he just has different preferences despite it just being a baby jrpg

>>716037117
NTA but having an opinion means you have a reason. You do know that's what an opinion is right?

>>716037201
I can't translate your rerardese, Ranjesh.

>>716037190
yeah, i just noticed it i see typos and missing commas i got to type slowly next time

>>716031705 (OP)
Were this at the beginning of the lawsuit announcement, I'd say you're fucking delusional and japanese courts would never dare go against nintendo. Now though, seeing the big N pulling the shit they are pulling and changing their case halfway in, I get the feeling that they realized they overplayed their hand and what they have isn't as bulletproof as we thought it was.

>>716037409
They're not changing the wording because they need to anon, they're changing it because they have to. Pocketpair basically pulled the "we can't understand it so it's invalid" card so Nintendo's only action is either to concede or revise.

Post the song that will play in your head when Pocketpair wins the lawsuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snE-WlCPA-o

>>716032808
Galeclaw is quite fast and also gives you more options to evade AoE attacks beyond player dodging

>>716037302
let me rephrase it then. why act like the whole lawsuit isn't just some herding tactic its basically just two sides fighting with their own conflict hating each other meanwhile it benefits neither at all, is that understandable now abdul

>>716037579
Entire Johnny Rebel discography

why would I even care about Palworld winning? You're implying I think Palworld is good

Palworld fucking sucks

>>716038212
no one was thinking about you though anon?

>>716038361
okay, mr. autist, let me rephrase: the thread implies that WE, collectively should care. MY point is that we shouldn't, because Palworld fucking sucks so who the fuck cares if they win

are you soothed?

>>716037745
NTA but there's only one side here, palworldfags, everyone else is just explaining shit they don't understand. But palworldfags see that as defending Nintendo because they facts align with them and not pocketpair.

>>716032051
I dont give a shit about palworld. I just want nintendo get fucked.

The We Won! update is going to be massive!

>>716038472
Anon, you can't pretend to be against Palworld while acting like you were while defending it.

>>716038597
when did I defend it? I hate Palworld. It's like Pokemon and Fortnite had an unholy spawn

>>716038472
Law isn't about the individual it's about whether or not something is justified, so when Dave gets charged for a crime he didn't do, you want him to get not guilty. Not because you like Dave, but because Dave shouldn't be charged and neither should you.

>>716038548
why are you always using this excuse i seen this excuse 3 times, none of the shit I've seen here are an actually explanation it was more like a speculation more than an actual explanation and i can see the biasness in this some have good points like they having to do because they are starting mess with merchandise or to protect they're brand from lel violence when they literally promote kidnapping animas and forcing them to fight and wouldn't do much but would scare nintendo cause that where most of their money comes and something else take some of their stock they'll be mad but that's all speculation instead of calling palworld fags why aren't you calling the absurd excuses why pokemonfags think why the game was getting sued like how they think it's hurting the industry which never was given a proper explanation how it hurts it
Im not even a palworld fag i think the game flawed but it is enjoyable to a extent but both sides have been just shitflinging also this is my last reply since i have had sleep since 6pm to 2 am

>>716032051
Nintendo have lost a few times actually. Not that an idiot would know

>>716031705 (OP)
It'll most likely be a "phyrric" victory: Palworld can still exist but will have to change certain gameplay features like cutting out the capture balls.

But tbqh using balls was always the least original feature of it and is a mismatch to it's gun focused gameplay. Should have added a capture gun where instead of different types of balls you have different types of ammo and the ammo behaves like a physical object/grenade so the physics is basically the same.

But by being adamant to use thrown balls and have them function exactly like Pokeballs, that is a bad look for Palworld in general.

>>716033705
Learn to think for yourself instead of listening to assblasted Nintendo hating journos just because their views align with yours.
>Nintendo performed a standard court procedure, the same one that ensured them the win in the previous patent lawsuit case
>NEENTENDOOO IS DESPERATE AND ARE FORGING EVIDENCE
Retard

>>716038876
But Dave did commit the crime. Putting back the shit he stole after he got caught doesn't me he dindu nuffin.
In addition Dave has history of theft, assault and rape.
Why should I want him to get not guilty?

>>716038472
I know this was supposed to be my last reply but if you didn't care who won why are going to said thread to whine about it just like you said
>WE shouldn't
as in you do care for what they say and im not really hating you for hating it just asking why are you here then

>>716037409
? it's normal for pretrial tho
you can find a similar case on colopl lawsuit.

Stop arguing with this dork
He's just gonna complain about how palfags were mean to nintendo on twitter and nobody knows japanese patent law except him again

>>716038942
NTA but what excuse?
Stating a fact isn't a bias it's just a fact.

>>716039542
You know he's a Palworld fanboy right?

>>716031705 (OP)
of course they will win. nintendo has no case

>>716031705 (OP)
>they will either have to do good shit, or lose relevance.
Nah, Palworld is ass as well, doesn't even compete with Pokemon in several ways (Not a turn based RPG, is a survival game, not on Nintendo consoles) and Pokemon will always have hordes of manchildren and parents who buy it anyway (plus two more copies to compensate for the dexit chuds).

>>716031705 (OP)
> Pocketpair might actually win this
Kami-sama PLEEEESE

>>716031705 (OP)
are tendiejeets legit the only "people" who defend jeetendo over this?
anyone with a functioning brain can tell that this is blatant patent trolling because pocketpair made one monster collection game that's better than all of pokeslop combined

No one actually thinks that pocketpair can win this right?
They've literally admitted to stealing ideas in an interview and call that their "design philosophy".

>>716039157
>Sue random company because they used a common sense layout
>Claim they're damaging your brand and keeping your IPs from flourishing
>Win lawsuit and suck out a ton of money from the company
>Kill the game you had that used the infringement anyway
I still have a feeling Dragalia existed solely as a macguffin to defend the patent with

>>716041820
>>Kill the game you had that used the infringement anyway
Yeah I'm pretty sure they didn't kill SM64 DS.

>>716041820
>try to patent layout someone has owned for years to patent troll
>company that owns it is informed and sues them for their bullshit
>instead of accepting they fucked up they drag out the case to harm the plaintiff by calling their patent into question expecting them to concede
>realise that the plaintiff has more money than they thought and actually tries to fight their bullshit
>realise they can't fight it and settle
And that's the story of Colopl vs Nintendo.

Fartendo lost, they can't make good games anymore, every new game I. Switch 2 has been dogshit

>>716042126
I hope you're paid to defend pocketpair.

>>716032834

Pokemon could make a game that is exactly everything you wanted in the series and you will still bitch about it.

Is palworld even that big? Like pokemania was, this is the only place I hear about palworld and they need compete more where is the merch, cards, anime, stores etc..

>>716042658
Compared to other tamers at their peak? No. Hell, the only thing keeping it relevant is Nintendo so once this lawsuit ends it's just going to become known as that FOTM game that got a Jewish company sued.

Palkek is the only losing relevancy lmao even

>>716042658

No. It had some inflated launch numbers due to gay pass but otherwise it’s irrelevant.

>>716042658
It sold way more than most, way faster

>>716042658

It's propped up by the same PC Chinks and whiny streamers that play nothing but survival crafting slop

>>716042354
but they haven't they been half assing these games then patched them after a few months and literal optimization took a whole 5 year plus a new console

Mimog best pal

>>716043012
Are you describing pokemon or palworld? Because it seems like you're talking about Palworld.

>>716042937
it still sold a lot even without the game pass

>>716043089
NTA but why not both?
Although Palworld hasn't been out for 5 years.

>>716043089
pokemon and dont do the whataboutism cause both games have flaws but one is made by studio that been around for years yet can't make a competent game

Nintendo always win baby
And pokemon in Japan is sacred
Pocketpair is fucked

>>716042658
it did way better than all the indie tamers but yeah like one of the anon said its only talked about with the lawsuit even though it may not get Pokémon levels of fame it's still has it fame and it still manages to pull in 70k players even though the update been a few months or a few weeks

>>716043202
>and dont do the whataboutism cause both games have flaws but one is made by studio that been around for years yet can't make a competent game
Gamefreak or pocket pair? That describes both.

>>716043202
That's not what whataboutism is, also you just confirmed you're talking g about Palworld since its the only one made by a studio that hasn't ever made a competent game.

>>716042072
can you tell me how colopl vs nintendo applies to pocketpair or palworld because it doesn't seem to be the same case with what colopl did they did it to themselves it seems palworld isn't really doing that

>>716031705 (OP)
Reminder that shiggy said in an interview that they wanted to patent running and jumping in the Mario Nes era. Nintendo deserves to get fucked.

>>716043505
no one said palworld im talking about pokemon they had like 10 or more years of working on pokemon yet can't make an actual good one and you contradicted what you said since palworld itself is successful and its other games overdungeon but since anon's can't really bother to do research they just resort to being dumbass for the sake of it

>>716043338
>Nintendo always win baby
This kills you
>>716034295

>>716043543
>colopl infringes on a patent
>pocketpair infringes on a patent
>Nintendo sues colopl
>Nintendo sues pocketpair
>colopl tries to use prior art
>pocketpair tries to use prior art
>colopl fails
>pocketpair fails
>colopl tries to call the patents vague and invalid
>pocketpair tries to call the patents vague and invalid
>Nintendo revises the patent to make the scope clearer and more focused in their trial with colopl
>Nintendo revises the patent to make the scope clearer and more focused in their trial with pocketpair
>colopl tries to drag it out and ends up settling
>pocketpair...?

>>716043694
Work on your English, Rasheed. Nothing you said here makes sense.

>>716043694
>and you contradicted what you said since palworld itself is successful
So you think every pokemon game is good because they were successful?

>>716043806
but it does have prior art and the patents were vague it just seems like loophole to me desu only reason i think colopl failed cause they had little to no evidence to show they were in the right also we don't really know what pocketpair has up their sleeves and all lawsuits has up can't end the same because something is similar

>>716043881
esl pretending to know English please go back to eng class if you can't read that

>>716043937
no, it's because of their brand anything labelled with pokemon will obviously be bought out in droves and sell out since its pokemon sales =/= quality

>>716044160
>no u!
Mohair, it would be easier just to take an English class.

>>716044240
>sales =/= quality
So you admit pocketpair has never made a good game.

>>716044257
it would be easier for you* there fixed for you mr Sahar do better next time with your speech

>>716044374
so, you also agree that pokemon doesn't also make good games that great i'm glad we see eye to eye anon

>>716031705 (OP)
>they will either have to do good shit, or lose relevance
You can keep parroting this, but Pokemon will never lose relevance, and Palworld will die long before Pokemon does.

>>716036225
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bxwfl_-P2gI

>>716032889
Come on now anon stop lying to yourself and embarrassing yourself

I don't think I've ever met someone who actually plays pokemon. They just say they do or collect cards to sell on the internet while talking about how pokemon made their childhood

>>716031705 (OP)
Unfortunately, the case is in Japan, they don't make rulings the way you'd expect, they'll take Nintendo's side because they have "seniority" over Pocketpair.

Threadly reminder that Palworld launched on PC and Xbox, only coming to playstation months after release and long after it hit it's stride. sneedstation is an irrelevancy.
>inb4 "palsnoy cope"
objective fact.

>>716033848
I M A G I N E

>>716044549
Both games will get moved by the sheer pace Aniimo content slop will push out at.

Aniimo is a full on gacha slop dev push into the creature catching game space and they are clearly stealing as much homework as they can to make their gacha slop extra sloppy.

Palworld doesn’t have to last, it proved you can make Pokémon bleed. Other devs smell that blood.

>>716045721
most of these threads are just this since it pisses off both either side
10% interesting arguments 30% console wars
30% saying the games is good or ass 30% Troll posts

>>716033985
>Every time I see someone talk about Palworld/Pocketpair, and especially the legal case, in relation to Pokemon, it's always in some vague way about how "Pokemon isn't good and this will make them be good!!!" with absolutely zero actual context on what that means, like OP.

And yet the Pokémon Direct is tomorrow thoughts on the glorified mobile game advertisement showcase?

>>716035284
>Palworld isn't competing with Pokémon

Then why doesn’t Nintendo drop all charges and patent filing? ;)

>>716036117
>Pokémon games are copy and paste and boring but Palworld somehow manages to be even worse.

So much so that they keep reusing the same Pikachu model since fucking Gen 6.

>>716046554
The art peaked with the gameboy advance era

>>716038212
>Idiot still replies to thread nevertheless

>>716046062
The idea is that the lack of competition in animal battlers is what's keeping GameFreak complacent and therefore lazy, so competition will force them to step up their game. The bare and honest truth is that the faggots over at GameFreak are just lazy for no particular reason, and competition will not change that.

>>716042658
>this is the only place I hear about palworld

Nintendo is giving it free publicity with its stubbornness, if they just left it alone it probably faded away as a memory

>>716042658
>this is the only place I hear about palworld

Nintendo is giving it free publicity with its stubbornness, if they just left it alone it probably faded away as a memory

>>716032051
listen nigger, im not a fan of sony either but at least their dirty money helps palworld and nintento can fuck off

>>716046892
People think GF are lazy but it's the exact opposite. To this day there hasn't been another series that does as much as pokemon

>>716042658
my friends at work were obsessed with it. i don't know if thats still the case but there are people that genuinely enjoy it

>>716048049
As sad as it is I have to agree. Just look at SMT VV for instance, it's a rerelease and they only added like 30 new demons for a total of about 250 and one new area if I remember right?
Meanwhile pokemon SV started with a fully open world and 400 or so monsters with a metric ton of interactions on the overworld with the dlc doubling the monster count and adding two new fully open world maps.

>>7160480492
>does as much as pokemon
que the webm of the latest pokemon game looking like poop and running like poop as well as being lazy on the animation

>>716045895
>lucario
>that tall
lol
lmao even

>>716042864
That was the point of Nintendo suing them. They know they won't win, but they want to draw this out as long as they can to slowly kill the game, because how dare anyone find them asleep at the wheel and make some money in what they think is their turf.

>>716048834
>but they want to draw this out as long as they can to slowly kill the game
Anon, you know it's pocketpair drawing things out right now because they don't have a case, right?

>>716048892
According to what exactly? They have a good defense and it's Nintendo that is trying to change the verbiage to a patent to make it more broad and confusing.

>>716048892
it's better than just giving up and dying

>>716049084
>They have a good defense
No they don't? Their defence is made up of examples of gliding but they don't even know that that they aren't arguing the concept of gliding.
>it's Nintendo that is trying to change the verbiage to a patent to make it more broad and confusing.
1) that's in response to pocketpair changing their argument from "we aren't infringing" to "your patents aren't valid"
2) you can only reduce the scope of a patent aka making it less broad. It's reviewed before the next court session and compared to the original version to make sure they haven't introduced any new information to broaden the patent

Are you being paid to defend pocketpair?

>>716049523
NTA but no, no it isn't.
By attempting to fight it they're doing far more harm to themselves than Nintendo ever could since they're only asking for about 70k and the removal of the patented mechanics.
They're probably going to die fighting rather than live in acceptance of what they did.

>>716050142
and an injunction to stop selling the game that hurts them way more than not fighting nintendo's lawsuit also what acceptance they didn't do anything that wrong

>>716050035
That's just seeking a dismissal based on the case having no merits, if their patents were never valid in the first place. Did you not read the changes? Nintendo is desperate and is going to get felted and there is nothing you can do about it, but watch. At least you get a new direct tomorrow though, that's something to be excited about. A new dialed in pokemon game is sure to perk you up.

>>716050695
>an injunction to stop selling the game
The injunction is only for the patented mechanics, not the game. I literally just said that to you.
They're lopping off an arm because of a papercut.

>>716050035
NTA thing is you forgot to mention this isn't common practice around states this is a japan only thing even though it happens around other states there's exceptions also they do have a defense they have to argue how the code is different and how similar something works similar they could use other games as defense but they have to pin point similar games with similar mechanics that do the same things but do a different way in aesthically and stop assuming everyone is paid shills you both sides been saying it and it not getting nowhere inb4 that faggot that spews "ITS THE PALFAGS FAULT* no its isn't they are just they using what information they given even if some may some wrong stuff in it both sides only have been doing speculation we don't know what defense they'll be using so wait till 3 years are up and enjoy whatever game you want to play for the meantime

>>716032051
Tendies, not even once

>>716051137
read the lawsuit again the injunction targets the whole game entirely what you're thinking of is a copyright lawsuit which forces someone to change something, or they shut it down

>>716046285
cause they a petty bitch ;D

>>716050748
>That's just seeking a dismissal based on the case having no merits,
And it was never going to happen since they have mounting evidence against pocketpair including their admission and past instances of taking from other games. All they could do is pull a desperation move and extend the trial so Nintendo doesn't deal the finishing blow sooner.
>Did you not read the changes?
Did you? Functionally nothing changed and the scope of it has been reduced.
>Nintendo is desperate
How exactly is it desperation if it's pocketpair forcing them to alter it in a desperation move?

>>716036117
It is a rust/arc game though? If thats not your cup of tea then it was never for you

>>716051291
>the lawsuit again the injunction targets the whole game
It doesn't. Nowhere in the lawsuit does it say that the injunction affects the whole game, it's just the infringement. The fact that the game it up now without the patented features is more than enough evidence to tell you that the injunction doesn't affect it since it's an interim injunction.

>>716051279
Thats racist.

>>716048049
Numbers aren’t everything anon

ITS ABOUT QUALITY

>>716051170
>this isn't common practice around states
It's common practice around the world anon, it's not Japan exclusive.
>how the code is different
Code is covered by copyright, not patent you dumbass. If they tried then it would immediately get thrown out.
>and how similar something works similar they could use other games as defense but they have to pin point similar games with similar mechanics that do the same
And the point is that they don't even know what they're trying to argue since they're going for the actual act of gliding.
>and stop assuming everyone is paid shills
It's hardly an assumption given you lot can't into English and completely disregard reality for a bogus narrative that supports pocketpair rather than one that acknowledges the facts.
If you're doing it for free then holy fuck you're sucking that corporate cock right to the balls.

>>716052362
He didn't say anything about numbers.

>>716052549
It's probably that anon who shitposts about another anon, who btfo'd him in a conversation about monster counts.
Every once in a while he'll post a screenshot of the guy and shit out some autism about him.

>>716051635
I don't think you understand what the case is even about. It's not about copyright, there is nothing about their intellectual property either, it's about patents that they filed after the fact and now they are modifying them. Please learn to read anon, I know you are a big Nintendo fan, but they messed up.

>>716053787
>It's not about copyright, there is nothing about their intellectual property either, it's about patents that they filed after the fact and now they are modifying them
And you're saying he doesn't understand.
Okay, first, by bringing up code you're the one who brought up copyright, that's what that anon said. To explain, code is a creative product in the same way a story would be.
Second, patents are intellectual property.
Copyright, patents and Trademarks are all different forms of intellectual property.
Third, patents were filed before the release of Palworld and before any of them were shown in a trailer or gameplay.
And finally, it's Pocket Pair's call for invalid patents forcing them to alter the wording, it wasn't a personal choice by Nintendo.

Honestly, the sheer hubris necessary to claim someone doesn't understand only to show you didn't even understand the concept of IP let alone the case is just... Wow. No wonder people think you're a paid shill.

>>716052392
>it's not japan exclusive
Missed what i even said i said Japan has way more freedom with that and can easily take advantage of it but there are countries that have exceptions or restrictions, so it doesn't allow someone to exploit it which you somehow glossed over
>code is different
i meant if they could find out if they stole code or not
>going for the act of gliding
how are you going to patent the idea gliding all it is just floating nothing unique even if it's swapping out what makes it unique and how would you do it anon since it would be easy how would you make a mechanic that lets you swap out creatures swifty without infringing on their basic patent
>bogus narrative that supports pocketpair
no one is literally sucking their cock the only doing that is you with Nintendo's lawsuit team because you trying to say they have no defense when they haven't even started yet plus why would they just tell the world what they are referencing right now and if they did what is stopping Nintendo from gathering info and use it as a way to just counter them right of the bat and the same could said the same about nintendo that's why most lawsuits have to compile all their evidence in private until the full trial starts but i guess that's just going to get a response like cope or mald from you cause you think it's not facts

>>716054626
That's a lot of words to tell me you both are way over your head. It's not IP theft as their are no assets being used that explicitly belong to Nintendo. This is just them saying we got our lunch stolen and we don't like that you made a game that mogs our slop and we want to hurt you financially by filing bogus patents after the fact and then modifying them after claims have already been brought. Nintendo is going to get felted and your feelings might get hurt, but at least there is a pokemon direct tomorrow you can look forward to.

>>716031705 (OP)
why do spicjeet pokepedos get so mad at the mention of palworld? they even have a pajeet trannyjanny banning people for "racism" lmao

>>716055862
They have no personalities to speak of, so they literally brand themselves with stuff they like. They probably even got nintendie tattoos, because they think it can replace a personality. Do they think they are a nascar and can just paste the stuff they like to themselves?

>>716032808
theyre much better than you'd think

>>716031705 (OP)
i just bought and i'm having much fun with palworld :D i haven't used my switch in years rofl XP

>>716050748
why are you calling normal procedure in Japan desperate, like is that what someone practicing in Japanese patent law told you?

>>716056356
I happen to be friends with Mr. Japan and he told me Nintendo is fucked and are just trying to keep this rolling for as long as they can, because they are out of ideas.

>>716048049
>that does as much as pokemon
as much nothing, you mean
No, introducing a new set of 100 uninspired mons and another gimmick that they're going to discard in the next gen every two years doesn't count as 'doing so much'

>>716056574
Oh yeah, well I'm friends with Sir Japan-sama and he said Nintendo will win
The truth is this thread has nothing but retards speculating, nobody actually knows, they just think they do because of severe dunning kruger

>>716046062
It'll shill some mobile game, the tcg coming set in September(gotta ride that scalper boom), maybe a final ZA trailer, and at best hint that a remake of BW is around the corner for next year at the very end of the presentation

>>716056858
I really am friends with Mr. Japan though and Sam Sung.