Thread 717953779

Since this is a highly debated topic, let's keep on going.
I'm planning on replacing my 1440p with a WOLED monitor. Any reasons why I shouldn't consider? I have a 4k 55 inch miniled TV (165hz) and I really like the D E E P B L A C K S. So, to have parity I wanna get a 32 inch 240hz oled, so I can easily mirror to the TV also.
I HAD a 32 inch but it was 1440p, felt too bright (LG model) and kinda blurry so I returned it and kept my 1440p 27 inch MSI.

Is burn in a meme? I could just ride it out until QDEL is available desu. QDEL seems like the next step up desu.

>>717953779 (OP)
OLED has an expiration date due to burn in, has flickering issues, has motion blur issues.
but if you just want things to look good, it does great with watching movie content.

>>717954006
Okay, anyone who HAS or HAD an OLED come forward and convince me otherwise?

>>717953779 (OP)
I had mine for 2 and a half years and then the taskbar was burnt in.

oled rocks
that is all

>>717954779
Which model

>>717953779 (OP)
>Any reasons why I shouldn't consider
i've bought 3 OLED monitors. i returned 2.
it's a MASSIVE upgrade in every sense, but for non-media consumption PC use fringing can be really annoying. basically all text you read looks like those old 3D glasses with two ghosts
it was REALLY annoying on the two i got (LG OLED G9, the highest end they had at the time, Alienware's highest end one I forget the name).
i ended up accidentally getting an LG OLED TV and it justwerks. doesn't look as good as the monitors but at least i can browse websites without a headache

>>717955047
>text fringing
Isn't that a thing only on the QD models. I'm gonnna avoid QD for things like that and the rumored purple screen.

>>717955047

Granted it does require a very expensive ass monitor, but a few months ago I got one of the new 4K 27" OLED's. Looks great and works great, the text is significantly better than a 27" 1440p OLED I briefly had. There's really no discernible text fringing, I'd say text even looks better than my 27" IPS.

Honestly for gaming going from IPS to OLED was a significant jump, much like when I upgraded from shitty monitors to a really good IPS 6-7 years ago. The ASUS one I have comes with a 3 year burn in warranty. At this point I'd have difficulty going back to a non-OLED for my main gaming monitor.

>>717953779 (OP)
Garbage display tech that doesn't work properly with Gsync. Forget your deep blacks because they look like shit with this.

I'm sorry but it's just unacceptable.

>>717955968
>always the fucking ASUS monitors
>same example
>probably QD-OLED
Every. Time.

>>717956027
It doesn't matter if QD or WO. They both suffer from it.

>>717956027
my ASUS VG248QE is the GOAT. idk why ASUS has a bad reputation now.

>>717956253
It's not specifically an ASUS problem in this instance, it's an OLED problem.

>>717956217
My hisense TV has VRR and I turned it off because it was just lagging every 5 seconds. WTF does that do anyway?

OLED is an upgrade on the level of HDD -> SSD or a tier of gpu upgrade
it's amazing, don't let BROKE MELANATED FAGGOTS who have never tried oled psyop you into not buying one. reminder: nobody shitting on oled owns one. everybody who owns an oled loves it.

>>717956897
Reduce screen tear. Some in game options include settings like vsync to do this, but it comes at the cost of severe input lag. Gsync does it in a way that it minimizes that significantly and looks far smoother than what a game option will ever provide, not to mention is better at reducing hitching and stuttering to a certain degree. Or at least one of those, it solves a few issues with vsync.

>>717955160
It's an OLED exclusive issue because font rendering uses square pixel while OLED uses ebin triangle.

>>717957797
>reading text at 100% scale anyway
Shit's too small anyway espeially on 4k screens

>>717957596
>everybody who owns an oled loves it.
I didn't love VRR flicker, I'm telling you that i went through numerous screens by return policies and noticed it on all of them. I did not like it. And I'm not exactly a fan of being told i can't use this technology that I've been using for years just because i have to respect a display tech with a better coverage of contrast in colors.

>>717957596
how many OLEDs are at LAN tournaments?

>>717958070
Oops all TN panel

>>717955160
>rumored purple screen
>rumored
OLED tech is extremely well understood. No rumers required. QDOLED cannot display true blacks like WOLED due to the lack of a polarizer. Any ambient light, even light from the display itself, washes out very dark content due to light bleeding back into the panel (unlike WOLED which has extreme detail and clarity in dark scenes).

For whatever reason many reviewers seem to prefer QDOLED because it gets 5% brighter and supports colorspaces that no game or movie supports (perhaps the mindset of future proofing) despite its inability to retain detail in dark content and display true black. Between that and color fringing it seems like a no brainer to go WOLED.

If you plan on buying a TV to game on then there is no comparison. No QDOLED panels support Dolby Vision or DTS channel audio passthrough above 2.1 (80% of all current and past media uses this for audio) so WOLED is genuinely the only rational choice for a TV unless all you do is stream Netflix.

https://tftcentral.co.uk/articles/glossy-vs-matte-oled-panel-coatings-compared-including-the-asus-rog-strix-xg27aqdmg

>>717953779 (OP)
The technology simply isn't there yet. High refresh rate OLEDs burn in and burn out quickly while costing a buttload of cash, you're better off buying literally any shitty 120hz+ panel until we get there

>>717958253
>QDOLED cannot display true blacks like WOLED due to the lack of a polarizer.
So just get a WOLED. Got it.

>>717955968
It only flickers when you go below Gsync range and above gsync range rapidly. VA screens do the same thing, btw. This is going from like 9 fps to over 200 fps and that flickers. If you're going from like 100-200 fps in a real game it doesn't happen.
QD OLED has no text fringing because the subpixel layout.
I never heard of purple glow, I use the factory calibrated color profile and it's good.

>>717954076
I have 17,000 hours on my LG C1. It’s been great. No burn in.

Burn in is a meme especially in newer models with tons of mitigations against it

funny the "expiration date" posters dont use that logic for PC gaming

My PS2 lasted long then my PC so consoles are better!

>>717958032
larping faggot vrr flicker is the biggest load of horseshit "complaint", maybe you tried a model from 6 years ago or something
>>717958070
zoomer retard i don't give a fuck about competitive/multiplayer slop

>>717958615
what argument do you think you're making? my first PC I ever built still runs and it's from the Windows XP era.

>>717958253
>>717955047
>>717956027
I genuinely didn't knew QD was trash

>>717958458
>If you're going from like 100-200 fps in a real game it doesn't happen.
Incorrect. It can be as low as say from 240 to 220, or 190. And framerate is not always the root cause, it's frametimes. Fametimes is something much harder to control all of the time compared to the framerate. Making it very hard to avoid or even predict with changing specific game settings. I was at 220 fps and worst case 190 fps when i noticed a constant flicker in a dark game.

>>717958654
So shorter life than my PS1

>>717958650
that's fine bro some people just want to watch their pretty movies with their pretty colors for a few months, and others want to game. you don't have to get upset about it.

>>717953779 (OP)
>ooh look at those vibrant colors the oled screen is showing from my lcd screen!!!
Retard

>>717958458
I also never mentioned purple glow. My critique was never with WO or QD specifically. I'm talking about a separate issue. If you want my honest assessment of a QD-OLED i never thought they weren't dark enough like people say it's purple blacks or whatever. If you turn off your room light sources it looks fine and probably near identical.

>>717958753
>tranime poster is retarded
everytime

>>717958687
Tell me I'm wrong faggot.
I have had CRT, TN, VA, IPS, OLED monitors.
I like OLED and I'm using it until something objectively better comes around.
These threads are poorfag circlejerks, I swear.

>>717959073
QDEL is a thing but it's still doing testing IG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LteGcNgn4Oc

>>717959073
Something better is the monitor companies simply fixing this issue, and i don't know what the solution is. Perhaps it's putting gsync modules back into these monitors again. That's the only possible discrepancy i could see about what went wrong with using this technology that was previously working in screens, but then you would be kissing goodbye an affordable screen. I'd pay extra just to get this issue fixed. So you cannot label me as a poorfag when I'm willing to spend more on a perfect screen. On a sidenote and completely unrelated: something better is also mimicking a cathode ray beams to provide better motion clarity, which is in itself flicker ironically. Maybe pulsar will achieve something similar, But I'd prefer it as a controlled method rather than something simply just fucking up and ruining the whole screen.

OLED does have a very real appear for gamers and that is it's pixel response times match the very best TN panels. But why did it come at the cost of ruining gsync?

>>717959857
OLED does have a very real appeal*

correction typo

>>717953779 (OP)
that isnt what led looks like

>>717953779 (OP)
Burn in is not a meme. Anyone who says it is is just coping.
It is the primary issue with burn in that will never be solved since it is an inherent flaw due to using organic compounds.
Organic compounds degrade no matter what.

i personally don't use oled as a monitor because pcs have a fuck ton of static elements that are not always possible to remove.
OLED is best as a TV for watching movies or playing games with minimal hud.

>>717958753
Yeah, that's really a big problem.
But don't worry, i loaded the picture on my just as vibrant colors CRT television and took a picture to show you how it is supposed to be!

>>717953779 (OP)
im looking at this on my IPS so how come i can see the difference???? looks fine to me. OLED wouldnt be worth shit if there wasnt some artificial and asinine hatred towards glossy monitors. Im so goddamn tired of matte its unreal. The difference wouldnt be /AS/ noticeable if we were allowed to have proper fucking glossy monitors again
>>717961510
I think you need to get your CRT checked. Looks a little too fuzzy compared to mine.

>>717962059
Mine is designed to render the dracula's eye correctly, yours is designed to draw a shitload of pre-rendered trebuchets and teuton knights.

>>717962179
Ill have to see if i can find the picture i took somewhere forever ago of me running my pc crt at some retarded resolution to get proper scanlines. I kinda miss having a tv hooked up to my computer, used to emulate and watch older anime a lot more before i swapped in this one.

>>717962527
"Super resolution" bullshit?

>>717962565
yeah, its not like a tv. But its a lot fucking better at getting the feel that a tv would than just playing something without the "super resolution" Its a pain in the ass to set up/undo the first time or two around but, if youre on a PC crt, its definitely nice. It does enter the realm of too sharp that some people who use PVMs and whatnot sometimes complain about.

>>717963015
If i was using a PC CRT i probably would just use some standard lightweight tv shader.
The motion clarity/colors is much more important than the magical upscaling magical bullshit for me.

>>717953779 (OP)
More accurate comparison

>>717962565
>>717963015
only one i can find. Its worth doing,
>magical upscaling magical bullshit
it still comes out absolutely crisp and clear as far as motion clarity, youre not fucking with anything other than changing the resolution/hz in a really weird way. Its as close to getting 240/480 native that you can be on a pc crt. It just has to end up at ~31khz.

>>717963413
I actually remember doing this once to a CRT i had when it was my main display, but i didn't liked it much on that particular screen because the scanlikes were way too sharp and thin.

>>717954779
You probably just locked the taskbar.

>>717953779 (OP)
>>717961510
>>717962059
am I crazy? LED looks better than OLED to me.

>>717958253
>QDOLED cannot display true blacks like WOLED due to the lack of a polarizer
I'm unsure of the technical details to challenge your claims, all i can say is that I've had QD-OLED and WOLED side to side in dark scenes, both in a pitch black room and didn't notice any discernible difference to my eyes. And considering i have pretty sensitive eyes to even the smallest imperfections, I'd say this claim is questionable at the very least. And perhaps it's calibration settings on different screens that cause it to be more visible or not, i can't say. I just wouldn't say it wasn't ever doing real blacks, it looked exactly the same.

>QDEL
I wouldn't wait for this. We haven't even seen any demo tech and its halfway through the year. If there was any real serious consideration of it releasing next year, we should have been seeing trade shows with products, already with model numbers etc.. reported upon. While anything could happen, I wouldn't bet on anything showing up next year and being fantastic and reasonably affordable, especially 1st generation (and without issues due to new tech). First gen OLEDs were a big step up in some ways, but they had the burn-in issues that were very significant in the mid-2010s etc I look forward to seeing its arrival, don't hold off until QDEL - if it shows up and its great, upgrade then.

Anyway, OLED is great these days but it highly depends on WHICH you buy and for what purpose. 4K 240hz OLEDs are pretty accessible these day - wait, you had a 32" 1440P that was too bright...and it was an LG OLED or just a non-OLED LG model?
>Burn in
Is it an issue you need to consider? Yes. If it a problem post 2020, especially for a gaming monitor? No, unless you're massively stupid. Most OLEDs at this point have features that are designed to mitigate burn-in automatically, and you should leave most of them on so long as they don't affect your image quality (which is almost all of them.). You can also do things like hiding your task bar when not mouse over etc, ensuring you have goood screen saver and turn off settings when idle and more. I have a LG C2 42" TV being used as a monitor - it was the first time they made a 42" model (all others were 48"+ as the smallest) and at the time there were no "monitors" with similar or smaller sizes, 4K, 120hz or better etc....at the time. I has no burn in and I'm using it right now. I'm looking at getting newer 32" monitors myself.

>>717964030
The LG one was just regular, as I have never had any OLED panels in 2021. Only got an OLED phone. The 32 inch 1440P IPS LG was too bright and blurry desu so I returned it. Turning down brightness didnt feel right either

>>717963646
yeah i can get that for sure. some games it looked better than others. I ended up playing through a good few ps1 games like that and for some, it felt like it was the peak of display technology and others just felt odd. If it was anything older than that, i dont think i would work as well. It handles ps1 dithering really well at least to me BUT, it does lack the softness that a true TV would give and be not be able to blend things like the dracula eye correctly. Still, its a good way to "pvm for cheap" if you like that sharpness that im glad not a lot of people honestly dont know about.

windows is so shit with hdr i feel like its not worthg it

>>717953779 (OP)
>Since this is a highly debated topic, let's keep on going.
Oh fuck off. Its the same shit every thread
>poorfag cope that OLED isn't actually good
>OLED owner cope that OLED is the best ever
>muh burn-in
>muh pixel maintenance mode
>muh IPS is just as good

>>717963860
It's a "LOOK HOW COLORFUL IT IS!" picture, not necessarily trying to look better.
The LED one has a less crushed contrast.

>>717953779 (OP)
C2 owner chiming in. OLED is overrated. Save your money instead.

>>717964390
It "pops" more it's weird, you have to look at the picture calibrated properly and it looks really good

far better for movies or tv than it is for games

>>717964483
What are your claims on OLED as you are an owner? You're not that impressed with perfect darks?

>>717964365
WHAT MONITOR DO YOU HAVE, SAAR

No 24" OLED's yet, so I won't be buying anytime soon.

>>717964605
My guy I bought a 55 inch TV and that STILL doesn't feel big enough.

>>717953779 (OP)
>Is burn in a meme?
Mostly. If you're buying a modern panel, there are enough mitigations that the monitor has to reduce it. Unless you're trying to get burn-in, it likely won't happen.

>>717964195
okay, makes sense. I'm not too familiar with LG's IPS monitors. They do however make some great OLED TVs and monitors, like the one I own which is now several years out of date. I should mention even my LG OLED C2 42" is both GSync HDR and FreeSync Premium Pro certified; I think the same is true for most of the other LG monitors where the VRR and the HDR functionality are both capable. I actually don't bother turning on HDR because Win10 is rather shitty with it, though some games can enable HDR themselves and it can look fine there (my monitor switches to HDR mode when this happens so I can tell its working). VRR also mattter and my C2's is good, but its a bit old now so it onl went up to 120hz but that was high as fuck at the time which is why there are so many people who bought one to get a reasonably small OLED 4K/120hz as a monitor. Oh, its less of an issue with actual monitors now, but on TVs many of them have certain "gaming modes" and in the C2's case you have to turn it on to get the lowest input lag, best VRR etc. Note you do NOT need to have the "gaming" brightness/video setting modes, that's independent like how some have "movies" which are really fucking dark, a standard, vivid etc.. If you're buying an actual monitor not a TV you won't have to worry about any of that, even if its not a big deal given its a one time setting tweak, but important to know anyway.

>>717964603
CRT_

>>717964648
That's cool and all but I don't need glasses to see.

>>717964741
Any time I ever used HDR on windows 10 with my C2, it made EVERYTHING brighter to the point that blacks looked grey.

>>717964306
hdr is pretty fucked as a "format" theres hardly anything still that truly uses it in a good way and a lot of monitors dont display it properly despite having "HDR" nice and bold on the box. Its a pain in the ass to set up properly. My monitor "has HDR" which, if i turn it on in windows and turn on HDR mode for the monitor, just constantly flashes and changes brightness all of the time in a jarring/unusable way. I dont know what i could do different but it doesnt feel worth it even the rare time that i end up going "wow, that looks pretty gud"
before turning it off and being perfectly fine with non hdr instead.
>>717964648
>My guy
kys first of all. second. I have a 32" monitor, it feels too big at times but i use it at a desk. Next monitor im getting is going to be smaller for sure.
If the options for glossy monitors were better, i honestly dont think OLED would be able to have as much "claim" as it does. The contrast is nice but, getting rid of the matte finish on monitors would do fucking wonders for contrast ratios on cheaper tech and shit on OLED for being 10x as expensive as it should be.

>>717964009
You aren't sensitive to it then and you might want to see an optimetrist. This isn't conjecture it is fact.

https://youtu.be/6pWjYNRRIiQ @4:34 to understand. This is RTings which is other authority on monitor panels after TFT Central which was the source of the post you're replying to.

>>717964741
Oh one thing I forgot
>If you have the option, make sure it has both full capability, latest standard, DisplayPort and HDMI
The one thing that's annoying about my C2 is that it ONLY has HDMI. Granted its HDMI 2.1a i think which at the time was the latest standard, but I wish it would have had a DisplayPort that was comparable for its time.

This is mostly because of something niche that pisses me off, basically the HDMI Consortium threw a big hissy fit about not wanting to allow the full 2.1+ performance in Free/Open Source software (like having an AMD GPU on Linux), so if you do it will fall back to 2.0 which means either dropping resolution, refresh rate frequency, or color space (chroma 4:4:4 is what it SHOULD be, but it will drop back to 4:2:0 which is pretty shitty especially for using as a PC monitor etc) . This is not for any technical reason, just a bitch fit about drivers etc. If you're using proprietary drivers then there's no issue, but especially for AMD users they can actually suck more on Linux than the fully free versions depending. Nvidia of course still has proprietary drivers even on Linux s de-facto required given that the FOSS ones aren't anywhere near parity because Nvidia being Nvidia. Now, there ARE ways around this shit with FOSS drivers on HDMI, but its basically a hack that cannot be officially supported or by default because otherwise the HDMI tards would claim Linux or AMD/Nvidia or whomever was in breach of their agreement to use the trademark blah blah blah.

Note none of this is a problem is on DisplayPort however, basically being an open license standard so if you have a DisplayPort option on your monitor even on Linux with FOSS GPU drivers you can run full performance with no fucking around.

Buy Mini Led

Just use a secondary monitor for work/gooning and keep the OLED monitor as a gaming monitor, every single OLED monitor is labeled as a gaming monitor for good reason. Yes you can still get the burn-in from games but that's usually for dipshits who play thousands of hours of the same game with UI elements that are always on screen.

>>717964991
Yeah, that's pretty much part of the issue (among some other things) for Windows' HDR settings. It can be unfucked but its often a pain especially when many applications for desktop use don't get real benefit; If anything let HDR be invoked by games in their settings and work from there, but frankly too few seem to really offer a major benefit compared to SDR even at that.

I'll buy OLED when they drop about 65% in price across the board. Until then? Heh, not fuckin' happening pal.

>>717965398
But it just repeats exactly what i said about ambient light being the determining factor as to why it will raise the blacks. If ambient light is completely controlled then this is not visible. I know because i tested it in ideal conditions of where nothing was reflecting back that could be seen. Best way to know nothing reflects back is if a reflection is not even visible on the screen from any angle. Your screencap right here event states ambient light hitting panel. So when there is no ambient light to obscure the matter, it's the same.

>>717953779 (OP)
ftfy

>>717964648
55" is too big for 4k even.

>>717966286
nice.

>>717954006
>flickering
Miniled
>motion blur
Oleds have no motionblur

>>717957797
>oled uses triangle
This retard still doesnt know the difference between qdoled and woled. Woled is regular rwgb while qdoled has the triangular layout. Either are fine for text unless low ppi.

>>717957903
If you need more than 100% scaling at 32" youre blind

>>717966663
I realized I was missing some measurements here.
for reference, Windows was designed with a 90-110 PPI in mind.

>>717966992
you need scaling on a 4k monitor unless it's over 40"

>>717967130
No you dont retard.

>>717966854
>Oleds have no motionblur
This is we know there are actual shills infesting these threads. Unless they genuinely believe Black Frame Insertion (all of the tv variants included) looks as good as CRT's motion. ULMB2 (pulsar) is probably the only thing that might lead change in this area since it looks a bit better than Dyac2, but i still think it's probably miles off CRT. Unless someone comes up with something better. Blur Busters had a somewhat reliable CRT beam simulation filter that they could get put into mainstream monitors or something. But OLEDs do blur and it can be seen on their UFO test regardless.
>Miniled
For the VA panels, yes. But you will find IPS miniLEDs that are VRR flicker free.

>>717965398
wait so if there's a blue light built into it, and I use something like f.lux to block blue light at light, is it going to just kill the monitor? lol

>>717967353
how do I filter for crt on pcpartpicker?
are they still giant oversized boxes?

>>717953779 (OP)
If old was this much better, why can my LED screen tell the difference in your pic OP? If OLED colors are actually washed out, why don't these two images both look washed out to me?

>>717964365
Post your hand to validate your claims ;)

I got two AOC Q27G3XMN's for free and I'm loving the deep blacks but holy shit, is HDR supposed to suck? Not sure if it's just an HDR thing, a monitor issue, or if it's just Microsoft being retards with W11 HDR but sometimes the entire monitor dims for hours when I view dark pages before going back to normal brightness. Other than that it's a big step up from the Dell monitor I was using.

Look at response times of tv/monitor @ gaming mode @ desired resolution. The lower the better. Simple as.

>>717957596
It's a product with an expiration date on it. It's probably the closest production firms can get to a subscription model for screens. It's insane that people are buying them.

oled is dogshit until they fix the purple tint. i dont even care about burn in

>>717970812
isn't that a woled issue, not qdoled?

>>717968937
That's why you buy Mini Led. 90% the IQ of OLED but no risks of burn-in or the entire panel failing because of some humidity.

Vegan thread

>>717957797
What are the alternatives that look as good?

>>717971167
It's not even an issue. He doesn't even know what an OLED looks like in real life because he never used one.

>>717965398
WOLED is garbage. Has worse colors than LCD and worse color brightness than WOLED.
Your video even says as much.

>>717974443
>WOLED is garbage
>has worse color brightnes than WOLED
what did anon mean by this

Suppose I had pic rel and wanted to upgrade, what is the least controversial feature to get for the biggest upgrade id notice

>>717963860
They always have the saturation high in these examples to prove a point. Have you seen them in person? Oleds have nice reds and blues without being oversaturated in my experience.

>>717974659
It has worse brightness for anything that isn't pure white.
QD-OLED will look brighter on anything other than white because it can actually create the brightness.
Imagine having a red light and turning on a bright white light, is your room going to stay red or will it become pink?
Same thing for WOLED.

>>717974747
>>717974659
Forgot my image

>>717974747
People do have the pinkish ambient light screen for QDOLED on top of text fringing for QDOLED so I kind of want to take a gamble with WOLED

>>717974791
>>717974747
>>717974659
faggot 4chan X won't load my image

>>717974808
No they don't, stop lying. Just because people post things online doesn't mean they are true. There are objective measurements for this stuff.
Text fringing is going to happen on any display, you're just used to RGB fringing.

>>717974881
So QDOLED is better at color brightness?

>>717974969
QD-OLED is the only OLED worth getting in 2025. WOLED was good like 5 years ago, but now there's no reason to get anything other than QD-OLED.
Don't be fooled by people saying WOLED has better brightness or better black levels. Unless you're using your screen with the sun glaring directly on it through an open window it won't be an issue.

>>717975063
So I can have my bedroom lights on and it won't have a purple glow goin on?

>>717975085
That's right. You can even have an open window with light coming in as long as the sun isn't glaring on your window along with it.
https://tftcentral.co.uk/articles/exploring-oled-brightness-improvements-woled-vs-qd-oled-and-the-need-for-new-metrics-and-specs

>>717975153
So it's a nothingburger problem. Hey do you have a QDOLED?

>>717975508
Yes and yes.
321URX

>>717975579
Is the text fringing a meme? There are people saying that particular model has issues. I bet scaling past 100% mitigates that problem anyway.

example: https://www.reddit.com/r/OLED/comments/1kaknea/bought_msi_321urx_qdoled_regretted_whats_next/

>>717971167
apparently the upcoming lg oled panels have more purple reflections in bright rooms

they just couldnt compete with samsung without purple tint

>>717975693
Every display has text fringing. Most people are used to RGB fringing.
It's mostly noticeable at 100% scaling. This is what 150% scaling looks like. You can barely see it, but it's not something I see without moving close to the screen.

>>717975736
The room has to be studio light bright for it to turn pink.

>>717975693
>>717975786

>>717975814
>text just has a suble 3D glasses effect
Why does everybody complain about this and not put on their 3D glasses? What a shame.

>>717975862
They don't make them anymore

>>717953779 (OP)
Hiding my taskbar feels like a placebo but I don't want to risk it

>>717975814
XG27ACDNG (semi-glossy QD-LED) here.
Honestly this doesn't bother me at all, without significant zoom you can't see any greenish tint at all. But that's just me. Switched from an 1080p TN panel recently, so OLED is still another dimension for me.

>>717976526
Just have the screen turn off after 30 seconds

>>717956253
Depends on what you get like their premium am5 motherboards came with a crappy gimmick that damages your GPU which they only recently revised. Anything related to warranty is usually slow if they don't refuse it in first place.