>>719889880
imagine you only trained one marketable skill. you only have one thing that makes you useful to others.
you don't make anything.
you are literally a middleman.
they contribute nothing but easing communication between two parties which wish to communicate. two parties which have content the other actually wishes to posses and thus has value. these people often need to feel special in some way, so just like what
>>719890054 said, they take it upon themselves to "convey what they absorbed, how they would have said it" thinking they are adding to the inherent value instead of in reality smearing or bastardising the content.
its one job that AI has a well defined use for. an AI will do it better, hell an AI could probably trained on enough of your writing/speach to be able to figure out how you would communicate in the target language more accurately, how a translator should behave.
i fucking love when i have to deal with Indian's/paki's who feel superior because they "speak multiple languages". they never seem to realise it only means there is a greater number of people they can communicate who dont give a fuck about what they have to say. they aren't special.
