>>719916851
>I don't think you can look down on me for enjoying Fallout 4 when you're enjoying that dogshit show
It's an attempt at a show with videogame logic (which is audacious and refreshing). It brings Fallout (or Fallout-themed) elements to the screen which is always good to see imo, and tries to be true to form, to a degree.
It is nu-Fallout, yes.
Do I hate most of the changes to astetic that originated in Fallout 4? Yes.
Can the dialogue be super dumb and cringe? yes. Was the lore fucked? Yes.
Do I consider it a true-Fallout show? maybe.
I see it as I would a fan-made show and commend it for the effort for the set, costumes and props alone (remember I also played 185 hours of Fallout 4, and while I would like them back, I didn't want to shoot myself in the head playing it; mostly* don't get me started). I also said Nuka-Break is better (and is more true to form than the show).
As a Fallout fan I consumed both the games and shows despite their downfalls.
In short, if you wanna watch a Fallout show, Nuka-Break is what you're looking for, not the show, even if it has it's moments.
And if you wanna play a Fallout game, play FNV (or even 3), not 4, even if the combat is better.