>>723477438
There is no such thing as burden of proof. It's a rhetorical/debating trick to buy oneself an exit room by authority appeal and public guilt-tripping, which you naturally do, since you have no interest in dissecting the plot, or actually caring about it if it doesn't pass your square peg round hole of method based storytelling and assumption that poor execution automatically equals absence of intent or meaning.
Plot is poorly executed, but it is also not for abstract reasons and more importantly, - its execution is irrelevant to your choice on how to respond to it.
You gibber that it is nonsense in spite of being able to contemplate it, speak out against imagining and filling in presented holes (holes to you only) as headcanons in a sci-fi genre out of all genres, at the same time balancing "suspension of disbelief" dishonest idiocy about most fundamental things that constitute the setting, like Mass Effect weapons being a forensic nightmare, or in spite of FTL being ubiquitous there being no easily seen or even mentioned surveillance systems, or lack of ship metrics, or Bring Down The Sky happening in spite of the fact that it is mechanically possible to turn mass effect drives into kill vehicles, etc; yet being unable to do the same for sequels.
You're an actual, unironic dishonest midwit, who thinks he's smart for being ineffectually tautological about flaws even a child can see.
Dali (as in the artist) had a performance exactly suited for people like you. He once arranged a meeting with a man, but rather than meeting him, he turned on music, ran naked through a room with that man, an never bothered meeting him again.
>outside your headcanon.
Outside applying basic logic, you mean, you filthy hypocrite?
That's a basic selection and survivor bias on your part.
Installations that aren't covert critical have symbols. Installations in hot territory don't, or remove them on short notice.
