>>723949398
I don't know. It'd be worth it.
PCs had bad specs and cost $2000 or more. They couldn't do much.
Arcades don't need a lot of machines. But they need good ones. One good one is more of an attraction than money stealers.
Rich people need something to spend money on. The price isn't as important to them as it being impressive. They don't want to feel poor. It being prohibitively expensive counts in it's favour. Keeps bad ascociations off. Such as the mob that blamed Marie Antoinette for them being less. Them awperate.
I don't like money. But I've had rich friends and they were best friends. One of them. Who I let down by saying I didn't have any. You can have more than one best friend. Who you go to see and who you are with counts as one. Them at the time while you are there.
Games are more important than cars. Especially to people who stay where they prefer, at their home, hotel etc.
They are worth saving up a year or more for. Shared storage and processing network could change costs from hardware to whatever is rented to play, while it is being played. Scheduled properly and everyone could get their turn with all hardware in the world serving them.
Too serving as currency. Banking it. It the backing for money. A good experience, an adventure, a reason to say yes to a date.
With good spec for a PC that could handle 3D there could have been more effort to make 3D games, with action instead of exp as the incentive. Sightsee too. Essentials in game. The pretty parts. All the focus on them when not playing.
Games could be about getting to see the good.
Worked out anyway. Got some good stuff. Lenny's Music Tunes. Return to Zork. OOT.
Shouldn't make the same mistake now though and have what is out there not a PC, and not absolutely amazing. Inspiration needs assurance it doesn't end badly for it.
