← Home ← Back to /vr/

Thread 11919605

141 posts 32 images /vr/
Anonymous No.11919605 >>11919613 >>11919626 >>11919650 >>11919794 >>11919808 >>11919831 >>11919906 >>11920949 >>11921454 >>11921521 >>11921584 >>11923780 >>11925491 >>11925705 >>11925732 >>11928883
The peak immersive sim. Nothing else compares.
Anonymous No.11919613 >>11919617 >>11919623
>>11919605 (OP)
>immersive sim
It's just a fps
Anonymous No.11919617 >>11919841 >>11920107
>>11919613
maybe the immersion is just being underwater
Anonymous No.11919623 >>11919625 >>11921251
>>11919613
By that logic so is Deus Ex.
Anonymous No.11919625 >>11922348
>>11919623
Correct, Deus Ex is a fps with some rpg elements
Anonymous No.11919626 >>11920317
>>11919605 (OP)
It has a good setting.
Everything else is extremely mid.
Anonymous No.11919629 >>11924285
More like immersive swim, hehe!
Anonymous No.11919637
I quit after the entertainer guy level because it's supposed to be the best part of the game and I was getting bored. I was going through the levels and killing all the big daddies and saving the girls. I took my time and it just wasn't for me from a gameplay perspective. I guess I would rather play duke nuken or metroid or fallout. The story was cool and I really wanted to see what would happen so I wish I had liked it. Obviously it's got some cool shit going on
Anonymous No.11919648
>not a good FPS
>Not a good immersive sim
>The plot twist came from system shock 2

BioShock=style over substance

It's not even retro don't care about the rules
Anonymous No.11919649 >>11919657 >>11919737 >>11919783
When is the mod finally coming back?
This is getting ridiculous.
Anonymous No.11919650
>>11919605 (OP)
overrated shit
Anonymous No.11919657
>>11919649
august 2007 came before november 2007
Anonymous No.11919737 >>11919745 >>11919782
>>11919649
I was about to REEEE the fuck out as well, but this game released august 2007 on PC, so I think it sort of technically counts
Anonymous No.11919745 >>11921000
>>11919737
it's a directx9.0c game and basically a 360 game
so no, not retro
Anonymous No.11919782 >>11919792
>>11919737
Platform age matters and is capped to 2001.
>Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier, and official game titles for those platforms released no later than December 2007
DirectX 9 came out in 2002, though it was supported on XP.
Anonymous No.11919783 >>11919823 >>11919875
>>11919649
Granted, a Mass Effect thread did get nuked earlier as did that thread using a Starcraft 2 marine. We'll see how this one goes.
Anonymous No.11919792
>>11919782
A DirectX9.0c capable GPU is part of the platform.

You're not running any game on a PC without any GPU.
Anonymous No.11919793 >>11919795 >>11919797 >>11919897
2 was better. The little girls in 1 were ugly and i only saved em for the cheevo. Infinite?...well it looked nice i guess? I wish we got the alpha.
Anonymous No.11919794
>>11919605 (OP)
Not an imsim whatsoever. There's no difference in how you play. Ultra linear. Great aesthetics though.
Anonymous No.11919795
>>11919793
now you're not even pretending to give a shit about a game being retro
Anonymous No.11919797
>>11919793
They looked so fucking ugly and repulsive in BS1 that I felt a moral urge to murder them. Couldn't get myself to do that in BS2.
Anonymous No.11919808
>>11919605 (OP)
>immersive sim
Not a real genre
Anonymous No.11919823 >>11919825
>>11919783
This came out on PC in 2007 tho
Anonymous No.11919825 >>11919840
>>11919823
It's also a DirectX9.0c game so it's not retro
Anonymous No.11919831
>>11919605 (OP)
Sure is retro for dumb down console garbage
Anonymous No.11919837 >>11925676
They fucked up by not making the question "harvest or not" an actualy dilemma be keeping you severely underleveled if you spare them.
You could argue that first playthrough you don't know that, but as soon as you get the first gift it#s obvious which is the right choice.
The "moral ""dilemma "" " is laughable at that point.
Anonymous No.11919840
>>11919825
it's allowed. you're getting old grandpa, and also very forgetful
Anonymous No.11919841
>>11919617
keked
Anonymous No.11919875 >>11919984
>>11919783
Sad too. You faggots seethed for three days and reported the thread constantly until the jannies finally relented to shut you up. You just can't have nice things on /vr/
Anonymous No.11919897
>>11919793
Two had a better themes as well imo. I liked the criticism of collectivism and how it ran counter to the first game. Also being a big daddy saving the innocent girls and your daughter was more interesting.
Anonymous No.11919906
>>11919605 (OP)
It's boring and edges on being steampunk which is extremely gay.
Anonymous No.11919984
>>11919875
The mods have taken the effort to prune similar recent threads of the shitposts without deleting the whole thing. Each mod could be different or they're drawing the line somewhere with the stickied rules (that could still be changed at anypoint).
Anonymous No.11920018 >>11920173 >>11920330
i loved this game at the time but havent really had the desire to revisit it. yes it gets by a lot on story/atmosphere. it really nails it. i remember most of the abilities or whatever just feeling pointless. like possessing turrets. its hard for games to make things like that make sense over just doing more damage. oh well. its definitely worth playing.
Anonymous No.11920107
>>11919617
lol
Anonymous No.11920173
>>11920018
>i remember most of the abilities or whatever just feeling pointless
Just like its daddy System Shock 2.
Anonymous No.11920317 >>11921254
>>11919626
omg this. Incredible setting but mid overall, and that's being kind. Playing the game itself is a pale shadow of the precursors.
Anonymous No.11920330
>>11920018
>like possessing turrets. its hard for games to make things like that make sense over just doing more damage

a) you don't possess turrets in 1, you hack them. Possession was in Infinite. 1 has the enrage plasmid
b) the hacking ability has no effect on your damage output and costs nothing except maybe a shot of electro bolt so there's no reason not to hack things. It eliminates an enemy while giving you a permanent ally and if you do it at the right time it's a very effective booby trap
c) Every ability in the game is situationally useful to some extent even if some are blatantly more useful than others. I thought security bullseye was completely pointless but then I used it to tag thuggish splicers or big daddies who were in the right spot at the right time because I didn't have time to hack the turret or camera they were in range of and it works really well. There's some places where you have multiple turrets close by and a camera and it just sets them all off instantly. Not consistently useful but in the right spot it hits big.

Similarly, I ignored the target dummy because in my head it just didn't seem like it would make any real difference but then I realized it completely becomes the enemy's #1 priority even if they were already on top of you and can buy you breathing room whenever you need it, or keep splicers from targeting your hacked turrets.. And you can use it to lure enemies to specific areas if you've set up traps.

There's not a lot of occasions where a specific ability is absolutely necessary but you can get use out of any of them if you try new things.
Anonymous No.11920341
Definitely not a retro game.
Anonymous No.11920342 >>11925676 >>11925702
I actually liked the gameplay. Can't say the same about Infinite. No hacking, and the two gun limit were absolutely retarded.
Anonymous No.11920498
Wow, it's almost like this thread has been pruned by some one whose butt hurts.
Anonymous No.11920507 >>11920776
>deleting posts talking about the game
so is this allowed or not?
Anonymous No.11920776
>>11920507
It's not but the actual mod is away, and you only get drive-by jannies deleting random reported posts without context.
Anonymous No.11920938
Why wait until November? just update this board rules now.
Anonymous No.11920949
>>11919605 (OP)
I hope you die tonight, I truly mean it.
Anonymous No.11920991
Roughly halfway through these games they start to feel like a chore 'cuz of all the searching you do in trashcans and desks 'n sheeit
Anonymous No.11921000 >>11921003 >>11921005
>>11919745
It's pc bro.
Anonymous No.11921003
>>11921000
not any PC available in 2001

and it's also a pretty lazy 360 multiplat that plays like shit with a mouse
Anonymous No.11921005
>>11921000
That's like saying PS3 games before 2007 are allowed because they're on "the playstation platform"

and you know it. It's sad that you have nothing better to do with your community college summer vacation.
Anonymous No.11921027 >>11921032 >>11921198 >>11921349
>noooooo don't discuss this game it doesn't fall under my own arbitrary set of rules!!
Bioshock 1 is older than some 4chan posters. Get over it, chuddites.
Anonymous No.11921032 >>11921121
>>11921027
just go to /v/ if you want to talk about 360 games
what's so hard about that?
Anonymous No.11921121 >>11921123 >>11921257 >>11922271
>>11921032
What's so hard about reading the rules and seeing that bioshock fits the definition of retro? What's so hard about simply not clicking on threads that trigger you? I swear /vr/ has worse autists then /pol/
Anonymous No.11921123
>>11921121
you clearly don't like it here and you clearly don't belong here
just leave
Anonymous No.11921198
>>11921027
>Bioshock 1 is older than some 4chan posters
To be fair, the 360 is older than Bioshock 1 and we still can't talk about it or its exclusives here. There was also a time closer to 2020 when Bioshock and similar threads didn't last an hour before getting deleted.
Anonymous No.11921251
>>11919623
Yes anon, that is also an FPS
Anonymous No.11921252
Main thing this game reminds me of is how terrible game journalism was in the 360 era
Anonymous No.11921254 >>11922325
>>11920317
>omg this
Omg faggot
Anonymous No.11921257 >>11921428
>>11921121
The rules clearly give a hardware cut-off of 2001 and Bioshock PC'ss *minimum* (to play the game with awful settings) hardware are from 2004
Anonymous No.11921349 >>11921456
>>11921027
Well then why do you want to break the arbitrary rules
To chicken shit to talk about your slop in /v/?
Anonymous No.11921381 >>11921437
Highly overrated game. You walk slow, most combat is with splicers which you can easily dispatch, and if this is an immersive simulation game, then it doesn't do it well because I can't tell the difference between this and some older games that does FPS game play better. If you're not shooting you're looking around for items, but instead of the items being out in the open you're clicking on everything like cash registers, desks, trash cans, and so on. Just putting in an extra step to get your items as you obsessively interact with things hoping loot is in there.
Anonymous No.11921428 >>11921431 >>11921437 >>11921482
>>11921257
>The rules clearly give a hardware cut-off of 2001
>hardware
They don't, and that's why we keep getting these threads.
>Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier, and official game titles for those platforms released no later than December 2007 (homebrew console games made after this date will be permitted).
Notice how it says "platforms" and not "hardware"? Windows XP was a platform that launched in 2001. Bioshock runs on Windows XP. Bioshock is technically allowed under this rule.
Now, do I agree with these rules? Not really. I think PC games should be cut off at January 1st, 2006. Otherwise, there's far too much crossover with 7th gen console titles. This would help eliminate all the threads about Portal, Team Fortress 2, Bioshock, Mass Effect, Gears of War, Call of Duty 4, Crysis, etc.
Anonymous No.11921431 >>11921457
>>11921428
>I think PC games should be cut off at January 1st, 2006

The date might be debateable, but I agree we need a separate PC cutoff. Lots of games technically ran on XP well into the late 2000s because Vista was such a dumpster fire in its initial incarnation.
Anonymous No.11921437 >>11921457
>>11921381
>If you're not shooting you're looking around for items, but instead of the items being out in the open you're clicking on everything like cash registers, desks, trash cans, and so on.
I'm not against the idea, but I also can't manage any of those items through an inventory. It's not like in SS2 where I can hold onto trashcan sodas and snacks when I need them. A big hit against "immersion".
>>11921428
>I think PC games should be cut off at January 1st, 2006.
I'd prefer 2004 at most so it shares nothing with that 360 launch.
Anonymous No.11921454
>>11919605 (OP)
This game has more in common with Heretic than it has with immersive sims. That said, like Heretic, it's a fun shooter. Your resources in a given level can fluctuate quite a bit, so there's a nice amount of variety and choice in the combat despite the low amount of different enemy types.
Anonymous No.11921456 >>11921459
>>11921349
The board rules themselves allow any PC games released before November 2007. Even if they are 7th gen titles. And this thread is still up.
So if you've got a problem with all that, take it up with the jannies and mods. I can follow the rules of the actual board but I could give less of a shit about whatever your crusty ass considers retro or not.
Anonymous No.11921457 >>11921461 >>11921501
>>11921431
It's really annoying seeing games here that most people played on 360/PS3 just because they happened to have PC ports that worked on XP.
>>11921437
>I'd prefer 2004 at most so it shares nothing with that 360 launch.
How about November 22, 2005, since that's when the 360 launched? Then we could still discuss things like the PC port of GTA San Andreas, which came out in early 2005.
Anonymous No.11921459
>>11921456
>And this thread is still up.
Quote from a thread being purged
Anonymous No.11921461 >>11921465
>>11921457
>How about November 22, 2005, since that's when the 360 launched? Then we could still discuss things like the PC port of GTA San Andreas, which came out in early 2005.
That isn't a problem anyway.
You can talk about modern ports/remasters here. Even very recent ones.
Anonymous No.11921465
>>11921461
>You can talk about modern ports/remasters here. Even very recent ones.
It's generally accepted here, but it's also not written out in the rules. Believe me, I've checked.
Do I think it should be accepted here? Not sure. I'd like to see an official statement on it though.
Anonymous No.11921482 >>11921512 >>11921574 >>11921737
>>11921428
The rules are clear if you're not retarded. A "platform" is the sum of its parts, which is why the FDS/32X/Sega CD/ etc etc are all listed as their own seperate platforms everywhere you go online. By this logic this means PC hardware cut-off is 2001. Nobody in their right mind would claim that a PC with parts from 2025 is the same platform as one from 2001 just because you happened to install XP on it.

It also would make no sense to allow hardware for console up to 2001 yet up to 2007 for PC at the same time (which would allow to talk about the PC version of Bioshock but not its console version? Makes no sense).
Its clear that the intent of the rule was 2001 hardware cut off period to anyone that isn't a complete retard, or like OP, a shitposter who thinks of himself a master troll exploiting what he believes to be a loop hole. The only loophole is the lack of moderation since the attack.
Anonymous No.11921496 >>11922272
Bioshock is just a dumbed down version of system shock 2 with an underwater setting.
antisocialfatman did a great comparison.
Anonymous No.11921501 >>11921512
>>11921457
>How about November 22, 2005, since that's when the 360 launched?
I'd prefer no later than Nov 16 2004, HL2's launch date.
Anonymous No.11921512 >>11921517 >>11921534
>>11921482
I ain't reading all of that. But no, the rules aren't clear. That's why we keep getting these threads.
>>11921501
I could live with that, but again, GTA San Andreas. And no, the rules as they are currently written say nothing about remasters; that's just a generally accepted "house rule" here.
Anonymous No.11921517 >>11921523
>>11921512
>I could live with that, but again, GTA San Andreas.
Came out October 26th 2004.
Anonymous No.11921521
>>11919605 (OP)
I see what's going on. Carry on lad.
Anonymous No.11921523 >>11921540
>>11921517
PC version came out June 7th, 2005, same day as the Xbox version.
Anonymous No.11921534 >>11921650
>>11921512
>I ain't reading all of that. But no, the rules aren't clear. That's why we keep getting these threads.

Yeah right, like I'm falling for that. You're clearly OP trying to push your agenda.
Anonymous No.11921540 >>11921650
>>11921523
Seemingly no problem whatsoever as the current rules already allow games for 2001 platforms up to 2007 release dates. If you're worried about not being able to talk about your "PC experience", consider how tolerated it's been for people in these "technically retro because PC" threads to do the exact opposite and discuss their PS3/360 experiences of the game.
Anonymous No.11921574 >>11921650
>>11921482
>By this logic this means PC hardware cut-off is 2001. Nobody in their right mind would claim that a PC with parts from 2025 is the same platform as one from 2001 just because you happened to install XP on it.

But because PCs are so much more modular it is a bit different - often people changed their PC bit by bit until they needed to upgrade their whole motherboard. It wouldn't be uncommon for someone to be running a reasonably high end Socket 939 processor until well into 2009 - and not beyond the whit of man they might be running XP until the advent of Windows 7.

I think we need a game date cutoff seperate for PC games for that reason.
Anonymous No.11921584
>>11919605 (OP)
>bioshock thread extant 23 hours from creation date
We are in the end times /vr/ bros
Anonymous No.11921650 >>11921670
>>11921534
The fuck? I guess the IP counter was a good thing after all.
>>11921540
I think there's a big difference between being able to discuss the PC port of San Andreas, a game most people played on 6th gen consoles, and Bioshock, a game most people played on 7th gen consoles. That's why PC should have a late 2005 cutoff. I'd be MOSTLY OK with a late 2004 cutoff like others have suggested, but not 100% OK, because the arguments for it hinge on an unofficial rule that's subject to interpretation.
>>11921574
I was one of those people who used XP past EOL tbqh. I started using Linux, more, then got around to learning how to pirate Win7 just months before 10 came out, then flip-flopped between OSes until I stopped dual booting and went straight Linux. Win7 was the last good version.
Anonymous No.11921670 >>11921689
>>11921650
>I think there's a big difference between being able to discuss the PC port of San Andreas, a game most people played on 6th gen consoles, and Bioshock, a game most people played on 7th gen consoles.
The point is that the second one appears to be acceptable if these threads have been any indication, so I see less of an issue in wanting to discuss the PC experience of San Andreas if there was a 2004 PC cut-off date.
Anonymous No.11921689 >>11921703
>>11921670
I think I see your logic. I still like my idea better.
Anonymous No.11921703 >>11921716
>>11921689
Of course, it's yours, just like how I prefer my own HL2 launch day cutoff date for PC game discussion, and your desire of having San Andreas PC port discussion wouldn't be hindered.
Anonymous No.11921716 >>11921738
>>11921703
>and your desire of having San Andreas PC port discussion wouldn't be hindered.
The only way it wouldn't be hindered is if an unofficial rule continued being enforced. I say if that rule is going to continue being enforced, it should be in writing. In addition, I think the only ports that should be allowed past the cutoff are straight ports or sourceports, and not remakes or remasters.
Anonymous No.11921734 >>11922371
Just create /v2k/ already ffs!
With more and more modern games technically becoming allowed, splitting is more and more justified.
Anonymous No.11921737
>>11921482
SCPH-70000 PS2 is 2004 hardware.
SCPH-75000 PS2 is 2005 hardware.
SCPH-90000 PS2 is 2008 hardware.
They are all part of the PS2 platform (2000).
Likewise, all PC hardware are all part of the IBM PC platform (1981).
Anonymous No.11921738
>>11921716
>Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier, and official game titles for those platforms released no later than December 2007 (homebrew console games made after this date will be permitted).
Worst case scenario, don't make it obvious that you're discussing the PC port.
Anonymous No.11922271
>>11921121
Why do you choose to be a homosexual?
Anonymous No.11922272
>>11921496
Its steampunk NotSystem Shock.
Anonymous No.11922325 >>11922336 >>11922732 >>11923657 >>11923774 >>11923783 >>11924142 >>11924578
>>11921254
Are you 8 or something? Bullying someone for saying β€œomg this” is such low-hanging fruit that it’s nothing short of disgraceful.
Anonymous No.11922336 >>11922367
>>11922325
>Bullying
Anonymous No.11922348 >>11923737
>>11919625
And you're just a retard with some gay opinion elements.
Anonymous No.11922367 >>11922401 >>11922405
>>11922336
>bully is too insecure to admit they're a bully
Many such cases.
Anonymous No.11922371
>>11921734
only if it bans the discussions of modern homebrew and remakes.
Anonymous No.11922401
>>11922367
LMAO you think everyone here is the same guy.
Anonymous No.11922405
>>11922367
He called you right, faggot.
Anonymous No.11922591 >>11922708
Sage
Anonymous No.11922708 >>11922720
>>11922591
That's not how it works, retard.
Anonymous No.11922720
>>11922708
mods made it stop working anyway since they don't want people to be able to sage shill threads
same reason they got rid of the IP counter
Anonymous No.11922732
>>11922325
How do you get "bullied" on an anonymous online message board, exactly?
Anonymous No.11923278 >>11923280 >>11923321
I know it's bait but isn't the 'imsim' concept from 'simulation of small areas' like in the deus ex design doc, where you have stuff in there that would be there, which can be interacted with and the player can improvise out of these 'simulated pieces'? whereas bioshock is like a zombie shoot 'em up with powerups which basically is Doom, isn't it?
Anonymous No.11923280 >>11923321
>>11923278
(like what in bioshock can you even interact with? you just shoot your gun or your magic)
Anonymous No.11923321
>>11923278
>>11923280
You interact with the security systems (turrets, bots, cameras), the environment has consumables / interactive items that are consistent with the setting that the player can use for health / stamina (coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, food) and other items that let you craft items that give you new abilities, different types of ammo or help you hack the aforementioned security system (screws, kerosene, enzyme samples, etc.). And you can pick up random objects using telekinesis and use them as projectiles.

Also I would consider the photography mechanic to be a kind of interactivity, although more with the inhabitants of the area than the area itself.
Anonymous No.11923652 >>11923658
I like bioshock but its crazy to me for anyone to call it their favourite imsim.
Its such a stripped down and consolized version of an imsin that its debatable if it even is one.
Anonymous No.11923657
>>11922325
>omg bullied
Omg faggot
Anonymous No.11923658 >>11923683
>>11923652
>its debatable if it even is one.
It literally isn't. Bioshock is a shooter with powers you can choose from. There are zero stats or numbers of any kind.
Anonymous No.11923683
>>11923658
Nta and why is this even on /vr/ but
Health and ability stats are upgradeable
Anonymous No.11923737
>>11922348
You're a faggot with nigger elements in your anus
Anonymous No.11923741
>fpsnormie plays a game with rpg elements for once
>OMG IMMERSIVE SIM
Anonymous No.11923774
>>11922325
>Are you 8 or something?
>Bullying
lel oh the irony
Anonymous No.11923780
>>11919605 (OP)
Does Fallout 4 count? What is your opinion on it?
Anonymous No.11923783
>>11922325
Based and mature pilled
Anonymous No.11924142 >>11924238
>>11922325
reddit
Anonymous No.11924238 >>11924256 >>11924283 >>11924298 >>11924307
>>11924142
Anonymous No.11924256
>>11924238
t. bullied redditor
Anonymous No.11924283
>>11924238
Why don't you try calling him a nazi?
Anonymous No.11924285
>>11919629
>More like immersive swim, hehe!
Anonymous No.11924298
>>11924238
I mean this in the nicest way possible, you are not built for this site. You cannot survive without moderator protection, you will wilt like a flower in the desert. You need to go back.
Anonymous No.11924307
>>11924238
You are weak like a babies fart.
Anonymous No.11924578 >>11924751
>>11922325
they hated him because he spoke the truth
Anonymous No.11924751
>jannies autosaged thread
just delete it then if you guys don't want it up
>>11924578
were you bullied?
Anonymous No.11924787 >>11924862 >>11924867
I guess the mods are OK with us discussing Bioshock. The thread is still up, but all the discussion regarding whether this should be allowed or not is just gone. Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
Anonymous No.11924862 >>11924871
>>11924787
>all the discussion regarding whether this should be allowed or not is just gone
As should be the case. I'm sick of seeing spergs come into every thread that doesn't have a game from the 80's and start shitting it up with their elitism and ridicules qualifications for what should and shouldn't be considered retro. The rules are pinned and stated. There's no point for further discussion on that front. Either discuss the topic of the thread or gtfo.
Anonymous No.11924867 >>11924894
>>11924787
It's almost 20 years old, and came out on the Xbox 360, which is becoming retro this November.
Anonymous No.11924871
>>11924862
>I'm sick of seeing spergs
Yea, I'm sick of people like you too.
Anonymous No.11924894
>>11924867
That's assuming the rules get changed.
Anonymous No.11924901
Woah it's like I'm in the game
Anonymous No.11925491 >>11925510
>>11919605 (OP)
How the fuck is this thread still up? I like the game but it's not retro by any stretch of the imagination.
Anonymous No.11925510 >>11925612 >>11925627
>>11925491
It's legally retro, which is what counts, not what your imagination says.
Anonymous No.11925612
>>11925510
>It's legally retro
Anonymous No.11925627 >>11925697
>>11925510
2007 is not legally retro you retard
Anonymous No.11925676 >>11925702
>>11919837
the whole moral dilemma of the harvesting the little sisters getting white washed was clearly a result of executive meddling over the initial trailer.

>>11920342
> Can't say the same about Infinite.
funniest thing is that i don't think alot of people really remember infinite outside of all the porn of elizabeth.
Anonymous No.11925697
>>11925627
platforms released no later than December 2007
Anonymous No.11925702
>>11920342
>>11925676
despite it's limitations infinite has the best storyline, at worst tied with the first game. the second game's story is clearly written by the b team but the gameplay is a lot better than the first.
Anonymous No.11925705
>>11919605 (OP)
bioshock is jewish homosexuality

https://odysee.com/@AmericanKroganArchives:1/Bioshock.pt1:f?lid=90c807764318bb931ad3074fbd7eaee3912ad5a1

https://odysee.com/@AmericanKroganArchives:1/Bioshock.pt2:6?lid=90c807764318bb931ad3074fbd7eaee3912ad5a1
Anonymous No.11925732 >>11926952
>>11919605 (OP)
Meh.its definitely fun, I had a blast playing it. Though, I wouldnt say it's better than Deus ex and in my honest opinion, I'd rather play Morrowind or daggerfall. The last boss is also a letdown. It hugely disappointed me with how easy and dumb it was. To be fair, I spent a lot of time watching the movements of big Daddy's and started getting good at sidestepping their every move.
Anonymous No.11925738
Everytime you allow 7th gen discussion on /vr/ (like Bioshock), it inevitably leads to posts like the two above me: talking about a game from 2013 and /v/ tier political agenda shitposting

In other words: the only reason I can think of why you'd make this change in the rules (threads about PC games that were 7th gen console games would get deleted on sight before the take down) is you think that makes moderation easier for you because you don't have to bother to check when/where a game was released, but on the contrary it makes moderation harder because it will always lead to needing more moderation because of the inevitable off-topic and shitposting that ensues.
Anonymous No.11926560
Not to be this guy, but pc games being allowed up to 2007, alongside ps2 games up to 2007 is really retarded
Anonymous No.11926952 >>11927558
>>11925732
The thread inspired me to go through it again for the first time in maybe 15 years. Maybe I'm "Bioshocked out" but it's not gripping me like it did.
Anonymous No.11927558
>>11926952
It's badly paced. The art style isn't new anymore and quickly overstays its welcome.
It's a good game for it's day. I like that there are 6GB DRM free options for this game out there that can run on an Intel Haswell i5 with out a dedicated GPU with a really good frame rate.
Anonymous No.11928883
>>11919605 (OP)
Obviously simplified for the growing casual audience of that era, but the setting is great