>>12005148
My hentai collection is older than you are and still growing, and there's maybe an 80% chance that at least a few of the misogynistic depravities in it would disgust you, and I tell you that you are wrong and stupid. If I'm looking at porn I usually want a "male gaze", and if I'm reading or otherwise taking in a story (even if it's a sexy one) then I want actual characters, which means no shallow caricatures who were clearly designed solely to appeal to horny guys - i.e., ones designed by someone only looking at them through the metaphorical male gaze, with the intention that others would also only look at them that way. It's a perfectly decent concept.
Also I don't agree that Cammy is an especially good example of it.
>>12004519 is somewhat better and
>>12004125 is better still.