>>2081051I haven't played since discrimination was updated so I might be wrong on all of this but
>only accepted culture pops can migratePlaying Portugal, a lot of Indians and Chinese move from Goa and Macau, even more if I remove tenancy from my farming laws because that blocks peasant(?) migration or if my aristocrats build enclosures or my capitalists build industries. I hated this because it reduced tax
As Russia the Caucus Muslim genocide or whatever it is results in 90% of all of them going, not to Turkey as the journal entries describe, but to the US, because (again, not the "new" discrimination mechanics) the people are "White" and the US is on secularism so consider Muslims to be their brothers because of course, y'know the country that famously had no Christian strife or Mormon kill orders
>market migration is internal migrationI thought it was because the market leader overrides migration laws and Britain starts with Open Borders or will quickly adopt it?
>people complained that it made it impossible to grow coloniesHaha, yeah, that's why we require immigration to the metropole, including unaccepted immigration, both of which are ahistorical, and we're not instead creating mechanics to explain enclosures and clicking the green pastures button, y'know being an evil coloniser who forces peasants into colonies?
I don't even know if this fixed the US having nothing that represents historical immigration and populations, partly because they tried to represent the real state borders and their actual agricultural capacity
>not "revisionism"Have they made races less blanket yet?
Y'know, like European Heritage not being "All Whites", from Argentina to Russia, and Afro-Americans not being African and maybe not even the same group as "West Indies"? Even modern lefties stopped thinking all blacks are the same from Nigeria to South Africa