>>103287748>>103288040>Association fallacy>Claiming I'm moving away>Not addressing Chopra's role and responsibility as the director of the CFPB>Deflect from Vought1st, it's an example of pixiv is citing US legislation.
2nd, the only deflection here is you deflecting by absolving Chopra's CFPB and the Biden admin's of their roles and responsibilities in policing these shenanigans of which they couldn't possibly extricate themself with an alibi especially when pixiv specifically cited US laws in April 2024
They were the US government; you make it sound like that they don't govern, legislate or mandate so long as they're Democrats.
Under their government, since 2023, NSFW patrons and artists ability to express themselves were restricted. Own it.
3rd, it's not a deflection but an addendum to the other post since merging pictures would make it cumbersome, but you're clearly dishonest by interpreting everything in the worst possible light.
I am judging Chopra's CFPB and the Biden admin by the rules you and people like have outlined:
>The director of the CFPB has the power to allow or disallow transactions for NSFW contentTo quote someone like you in
>>103278991> rightfags had also started to root themselves into industries around that time considering trump won in the end. reminder that just because someones in power doesnt mean theyre the only ones with influence, especially during election years where campaigning is happening, if the compass flips its not a sudden thing, there is build up.I'll ask you again, was Vought responsible for what happened in 2023-2024?
Does Chopra as the director of the CFPB have power over and the ability to police payment processors?
Likewise, does the Biden admin?
Why didn't they address these issues, interpreting US legislation in favor of NSFW artists and their patrons?
I already know your answer:
>Association fallacy>This is a partisan issue