>>41022409
>>41022687
>content drought
yes but you're not asking yourself *why* it's happening. "content" (or whatever you mean by that) was 'good' for awhile because it was somewhat unique. it stood out due to infrequency. the means to create it were guarded and gatekept, so markets could be timed, franchises and empires could be built and lorded over. then techbros found out they could just do a chaos magick for cash by creating mini-content sweatshops, wherein they incentivized normies to create shitty content for credentials like verified badges and likes. Doing this flooded the market with meta-conversation re: how to game the system using both physical and psychological means, and now everyone, for the most part, knows (or is at least painfully aware of) everything everyone else knows. "unique", however, requires genuine talent and creativity, and thus is hard to make, and people don't like doing hard things.
this creates the 'drought' as you call it - the sense that everyone is saying the same thing, or doing it better, leaves only grifters and a few honest/desperate weirdos to create 'engaging' content that resembles anything of quality. the grifters repeat themselves, and the weirdos go pro. and the nostalgia you feel for quality content is created by the chilling effects that come with making that very content - you get copied (and now cloned by AI), or someone steals your idea outright and calls it theirs. and it works, because they have more clout than you.
as an artfag, i feel a sense of relief - people are waking up to how it is to be an real author, to see the difference is between shit and gold, and know the gold is being either suppressed or horded. it's not rocket science, you're conditioned to blame the wrong people.
i guess what i'm saying is the content drought is partially your fault as a consumer, and this is paranormal because the veil doesn't care about any of this shit. the truth is coming to light all around because of it.