>>149905137
>The story incorporating characters like those proves they're not irrelevant
If you could remove 90% of the human interactions and still be left with the same ending they're pretty damn irrelevant.
>Peridot is a well executed side character, it's why she's so beloved with a well praised redemption
I feel like you missed my point. Again, when Peridot joined the CGs she should have joined the main cast and yet she was barned. I could make the same point you're making with lars that she's not a complete character because of this.
>Lars main character trait is that he's a loser who's too afraid
Not really, he's a loser yes but he's still confident, he even hit on Stevonnie (well, kind of)
>No, the crewniverse's awful scheduling caused hiatuses
I feel like they did it intentionally just because people wouldn't watch a series of episodes knowing it was about townies so they had to force it
>You have done nothing but bash him and say that him being a protagonist is terrible
I haven't based him at all, as for him being a protagonist it's true that's terrible but that doesn't mean I hate him. That white car I passed today was pretty irrelevant to me and I think it would be terrible to have my life revolve around it but it doesn't mean I hate it or anything
>You think I'm not going to satisfied
Absolutely, SU is probably the show that focuses on background characters the most and if it's still not enough then there's no way
>He didn't even get any screentime after he became pink
Like I already said, that was the end of his redemption arc. His development was completed just like Peridot's who was also sidelined.
