>>150070079
>Cap Marvel painting
>1978 according to google and some art website
>That baboon, inhuman, clownish, blackface looking character in the back
Wtf? Did C.C. Beck get away with that in the 70's? If it was a private piece that makes more sense. Also putting aside that the 50's curly hair is very cute on Mary. I'm kinda sad 50's hair is sometimes frowned upon. I mean maybe once or twice I have seen it on older women but damn, if I get gf, I'll have her have that style at least for a month.
Also yes I agree with that whole paragraph.
>>150070191
Does modern academia really say that? Cause that seems like the antithesis of what they said before in previous decades where you had to see yourself in someone's shoes. Guess that takes too much imagination and effort. Perhaps they are saying this because we do have to admit there is a lack of minorities represented in a lot of significant places like movies where they barely star in the leading role or have a cartoon presence because everyone was afraid to draw a characticature or didn't think white people could stomach a black lead.
Now they are taking it too far and making them mary sues but I think we might pass that in the next couple of years. Who knows.
Spider-Man and Marvel is the most egregious. They just need Miles to now say, "Step aside whitey, I'm fucking your wife now. Gib me sum muthafuggin blonde pussy with the redhead pussy and while we're at it I'm gonna shoot a kamehameha so Latinx folx like me now! Also the entire 616 is mine now and gay Spider-man over here is my new role model! Thank you Israel! Thank you Bendis, Slott, Quesada, Brevoort, and Lowe!"
>>150077383
Most of those had Spidey do it for one issue though. There were some stretched out arcs where time passed or didn't between issues with the same guest star but either way, team-up books show Peter is willing to work with others but he isn't willing to play babysitter all the time and not have control over how he handles a situation.
