← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17892108

100 posts 36 images /his/
Anonymous No.17892108 >>17892109 >>17892165 >>17892178 >>17892192 >>17892464 >>17892523 >>17893153 >>17893199 >>17893528 >>17894000 >>17894182 >>17894238 >>17894952 >>17896007 >>17899033 >>17899079 >>17900324 >>17900337 >>17900366 >>17900376 >>17900772 >>17900932 >>17900962
>2025CE
>CE
>Common Era
What the fuck is common about it?
I'm not a Christfag by any means but there's no need to make up bullshit new eras.
AD will do fine.
Anonymous No.17892109 >>17892158 >>17892527 >>17896381 >>17899072
>>17892108 (OP)
It's literally just for jews, it means in in the year of our lord and jews don't believe christ is god so they rename it.
Anonymous No.17892149 >>17892161 >>17895509
Jews fear mentioning Christ but they wanted to use the inventions of his people and live in their graces.

Literally like wanting to be in Heaven but not recognizing the ruler and the standards that must be set
Anonymous No.17892158 >>17892163
>What the fuck is common about it?
It's the one most people use.

>>17892109
>it means in in the year of our lord
Only midwit retards even believe Jesus was born on Jan 1, 1 CE.
Anonymous No.17892161 >>17892179
>>17892149
There was some debate on changing where year 0 is but that was promptly ended when they realised they would have to update every single date.
Anonymous No.17892163 >>17892187
>>17892158
It doesn't matter if the exact date is off, same reasoning for before christ
Anonymous No.17892165 >>17894952 >>17895873
>>17892108 (OP)
Boobers
Anonymous No.17892178 >>17893187
>>17892108 (OP)
>change "Anno Domini" to "Common Era" to be more inclusive
>"Common Era" still begins with the birth of Christ
At least have the balls to go all the way with it like the Fr*nch and Koreans did
Anonymous No.17892179
>>17892161
There is no debate, though
Just people who fear any mention of Christ.
Anonymous No.17892187 >>17895253
>>17892163
>It doesn't matter if the exact date is off
Now that's cope.
Anonymous No.17892192 >>17892208
>>17892108 (OP)
It's functionally the same thing. No need to get bent out of shape. Call it whatever you want, history hasn’t changed.
Anonymous No.17892208 >>17892466
>>17892192
I'm just asking "What's common about it?"
Anonymous No.17892464
>>17892108 (OP)
just wanted to say that its 4 am and I'm really drunk and this image really made me think
Anonymous No.17892466
>>17892208
Its usage.
Anonymous No.17892523
>>17892108 (OP)

I've always felt that with the detonation of the first atomic bomb in 1945, the calendar should have been reset to year 1 of the Atomic Era, as it's a verifiable proven scientific fact.
Anonymous No.17892527 >>17892535 >>17893102 >>17893247 >>17895247
>>17892109
It's not just jews who don't believe in christ, you shameless lying scumbag.
Anonymous No.17892535 >>17892539 >>17900948
>>17892527
youre all jews
Anonymous No.17892539 >>17899319
>>17892535
>not worshipping rabbi Jesus the king of the jews who lived according to Jewish tradition even going so far to have part of his dick cutoff, means you're Jewish
You're a liar and everyone knows it. There are no greater liars than the worshipper of Jesus, the lying god. It is literally impossible for a Christian to tell the truth.
Anonymous No.17893102 >>17893122 >>17893202 >>17894002 >>17899075
>>17892527
Don't believe that Christ is the Messiah, sure
But Christ definitely existed, and it takes great stupidity to reject that fact

Like it or not, Christ is the single most important person in history. His impact cannot be undestated
Anonymous No.17893122 >>17893991 >>17894223
>>17893102
>But Christ definitely existed
The name "Christ" implies divinity, so no. And Jesus likely existed, but arguments to the contrary exist.
Saying AD forces the utterer to say something that means the year of the lord, that lord being Christ. Some Jews forbid themselves to say anything that recognizes Christ, including the word, so to avoid saying AD is something they must do. CE is useful to avoid problems like this in discourse.
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17893153
>>17892108 (OP)
It's 2778 AVC
Anonymous No.17893187 >>17896351 >>17896361 >>17896363 >>17900998 >>17901020
>>17892178
I have no problem with Common Era starting with Christ's supposed birth date since it coincides with major changes in the world anyway, being off about 50 years from the end of the Roman Republic, which is a good demarcation between classical and modern times.

We are however secular societies now and there is literally zero reason to mention Christ in serious publications and no matter how much the christcucks seethe about it, we're never going back.
Anonymous No.17893199 >>17893291 >>17896007
>>17892108 (OP)
Caesar's death should be the turning point for the European calendar. Jesus is a myth.
Anonymous No.17893202 >>17901020
>>17893102
Rav Yeshu was an influential man, but he wasn't the messiah. Cope with that. The calendar doesn't change when any old rabbi is born.
Anonymous No.17893247 >>17893314 >>17894002
>>17892527
doesnt matter if you believe in him or not

its from where we count our time so fuck off
Anonymous No.17893291 >>17893292 >>17893307
>>17893199
Napoleon's death should be the turning point for the European calendar. Caesar is a myth.
Anonymous No.17893292
>>17893291
Napoleon was not that important in the grand scheme of European history. Within a few centuries he'll be a footnote.
Anonymous No.17893307
>>17893291
Also acceptable. Prefer Caesar to statpad our years though. Living in year 200 or so is a bit newfag.
Anonymous No.17893314
>>17893247
Yes. It's also not the date of birth of the Jewish false prophet you have homoerotic fantasies about feeling deep inside you, so fuck off. :)
Anonymous No.17893528 >>17895873
>>17892108 (OP)
shut up and post more tits
Anonymous No.17893991
>>17893122
Even more reason to force the usage of AD then
Anonymous No.17894000
>>17892108 (OP)
No No No No No, actually. To say of a time BEFORE Christ is absolutely ridiculous in every way. Jesus has always been, is, and will. It's over. Shut it down. One time.
Anonymous No.17894002 >>17897899
>>17893247
Nobody gives a fuck about the year 0 as the birth of christ, which if he existed was not the year 0.
>>17893102
>But Christ definitely existed, and it takes great stupidity to reject that fact
Except he didn't, mythicists are better scholars. Jewsus was not more real than Moses and all other old testament figures rejected by historians.
>Like it or not, Christ is the single most important person in history. His impact cannot be understated.
Absolutely wrong, retarded and dishonest. Even st. Paul is more influential than rabbi Jesus.
Anonymous No.17894182 >>17894195
>>17892108 (OP)
because it is the most common :)
Anonymous No.17894195
>>17894182
almost none of those other calendars are actually in use in everyday life by people in those countries
Anonymous No.17894223 >>17894984
>>17893122
>CE is useful to avoid problems
the jews are a problem
Anonymous No.17894238
>>17892108 (OP)
CE / BCE is absolute shit. It increases your chances of making a typo or misreading it.
Anonymous No.17894952 >>17894984
>>17892165
indeed

>>17892108 (OP)
academics think that religion is caveman nonsense. Pol Pot had a bit of a point about not liking them despite being atheist himself, just not for the same reasons as him but other reasons too.
Anonymous No.17894984
>>17894223
Sure, but doesn't make what I said any less true. Not to mention, CE/BCE also appeals to some non-Jews.
>>17894952
There exists some agnostic/atheist academics who argue in favor of AD/BC in the same sense that it is much like continuing to use the names of pagan gods despite thinking it as well is caveman nonsense.
Anonymous No.17895109
They are slightly different, but the reference epoch is largely the same. Anyways, we should absolutely refer to the superior BC/AD.
Anonymous No.17895247
>>17892527
but it is jews who introduced it in English-speaking universities
Anonymous No.17895253 >>17896083
>>17892187
you lost this argument hooknose
shoo back to your rat tunnel
Anonymous No.17895509 >>17895830
>>17892149
Jesus was a Jew though, and you take pride in being his slave
Anonymous No.17895830
>>17895509
Yes. We are the REAL Jews
And yes, we are his slaves and you are a slave of the world
Anonymous No.17895873
>>17892165
>>17893528
Filthy lusters, begone.
Anonymous No.17896007
>>17893199
>>17892108 (OP)
It should be based off of the start of Seleucus's calender, it was one of the first to count from a date as opposed to a numbered reign
Anonymous No.17896083 >>17896211
>>17895253
Christianity is from Rabbi Yeshua ben Yosef. This Jew observed Hanukkah (John 10:22-23) and came only for Jews (Matthew 15:22-28). He forbid preaching to goyim (Matthew 10:5-6). He told a goya who gave him water that her religion was bullshit and that "salvation is of the Jews" (John 4:22).

All his talmidim were Jewish, including Rabbi Shaul haTarsi. He stressed HaShem hasn't forgotten (Romans 11:1) his chosen people (Deuteronomy 7:6). He adds that Jews come first and the goyim after (Romans 1:16, 3:1-2). Also, he was a proud Parush (Philippians 3:5). Contrary to what apostate heretics believe, Yeshua loved them (Matthew 23). He only criticized some for teaching traditions as mitzvot while omitting actual mitzvot. Like in Matthew 15:1-20. Read this passage whole for once.

Shaul said the covenant is eternal and that Mashiah will come from Israel, not from the goyim (Romans 9:3-5). The covenant gives Israel the land (Genesis 17:7-8, Jeremiah 7:7) from the Nile to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18). Arabs and other Semitic people are not included (Genesis 50:24). Jeremiah 31:31-33 does predict a new covenant... with Jews. Not goyim. Yeshua adds he didn't come to abolish the law (Matthew 5:17). He came to fulfill... prophecies. "Fulfilling the law" is an apostate's way of saying abolishing without owning it.

Goyim are welcome in the new covenant (they were in the old too, see the Book of Ruth). But HaShem wants them to be watchmen for Israel (Ezekiel 33:7). He will judge them for how they treated Jews (Genesis 12:1-3, Joel 3:1-2). A good talmid of Yeshua must:
1. Pray for peace in Jerusalem (Psalms 122:6-7);
2. Make the Jews jealous, not afraid or angry (Romans 11:11);
3. Comfort Jews (Joshua 40:1-2);
4. Help Jews out with money (Romans 15:26-27).

Bonus:
1. Revelations 12 describes Satan attacking Israel. It reuses the symbols from Yosef's dream (Genesis 37:9).
2. Ezekiel 37 describes the rebirth of Israel as a nation after the Holocaust.
Anonymous No.17896211 >>17896353
>>17896083
you lost the argument again coin shaver
go back into the oven
Anonymous No.17896351
>>17893187
>We are however secular societies now
tell that to muslims or jews
Anonymous No.17896353
>>17896211
>projecting
Anonymous No.17896361
>>17893187
>We are however secular societies now-
Let's stop being secular, then.
Anonymous No.17896363
>>17893187
>we're never going back.
We're quite literally going back, secular liberalism is dying out, only religious communities will remain in the future (Amish, Mormons, Traditional Catholics, Muslims, Orthodox Jews, etc)
Anonymous No.17896381 >>17896451 >>17896721 >>17899082
>>17892109
>jews
Why?Why they're so hostile against christianity? Jesus and christianity are the reason why they're so powerful in current world.
Anonymous No.17896451 >>17896721
>>17896381
>Why?Why they're so hostile against christianity?
Maybe because they persecuted Jews for centuries?
Anonymous No.17896721 >>17896732
>>17896381
Just because they feel religiously obligated to not say AD doesn't mean they're hostile against Christianity.
>>17896451
There were still some instances of Jews being facilitated and given rights by various dukes and kings. Not all medieval Christians were hostile to Jews as indicated by laws that prohibited Christians going to Jews for a multitude of things, like asking Jews to bless crops and whatnot. So it wasn't like there were constant persecutions of Jews, though they were very common.
And current day Christians are nothing like medieval Christians. It used to be that Muslims were more tolerant of Jews in the middle ages but obviously now that has reversed. Most Jews aren't hostile to Christianity, and if they are they have no reason to be.
Anonymous No.17896732 >>17896753
>>17896721
>There were still some instances of Jews being facilitated and given rights by various dukes and kings.
So they should have just not given Jews any rights at all? Is that your point?
Anonymous No.17896753
>>17896732
I think you're retarded.
Anonymous No.17897142 >>17897156
for me it's Human Era

12025 HE
Anonymous No.17897156
>>17897142
That's from Kurzg
They are pushing hard for that calendar because, surprise surprise, they are funded by Jews
Anonymous No.17897899
>>17894002
Moses might be the only guy in the Hebrew scriptures who actually existed
Anonymous No.17897912
The current year is 249 A.R. (After Revolution)
Anonymous No.17899033
>>17892108 (OP)
>AD will do fine.
No, it won't!
Anonymous No.17899072 >>17900365
>>17892109
>It's literally just for jews, it means in in the year of our lord and jews don't believe christ is god
Neither do Indians, Chinese, or Japanese. The majority of people alive are not Christian.
Anonymous No.17899075 >>17899104
>>17893102
>But Christ definitely existed
Bullshit. The evidence of Jesus existing historically is weak. It's probable the cult started with some Jewish wandering holy man, but that guy would most likely be very different from the literary and theological "Jesus Christ".

>Like it or not, Christ is the single most important person in history.
Vague and undemonstrable statement.
Anonymous No.17899079
>>17892108 (OP)
I reject Christianity and the Jews that made it up, so I'd rather have a dating system based off of some meaningful achievement of science and engineering. Year 1 should start with the first Apollo landing, I say.
Anonymous No.17899082 >>17900853
>>17896381
>Why they're so hostile against christianity?
Maybe because Christianity is directly based on Judaism but mangles many of it's concepts and it's basic premise of Jesus being the Jewish Messiah is outright wrong?
Anonymous No.17899104 >>17899118
>>17899075
>The evidence of Jesus existing historically is weak
There are more documents about Christ than Ceasar
Anonymous No.17899118 >>17899130
>>17899104
Bullshit. There might possibly be more individual texts that mention Jesus written in the following two centuries after his death than there are about Caesar, but all of these texts are lacking in reputability due to their separation from the lifetime of this supposed person, whereas for Caesar, we literally have his own writings.
Anonymous No.17899130 >>17899144
>>17899118
Gospels were written when the famous characters like Pilate and the Pharisees are still alive
Anonymous No.17899144 >>17899156
>>17899130
No they weren't. Pilate died in 39 and the earliest Gospel, Mark, is from 70. Even if they were, why would it matter? People believe the most random bullshit rumors, myths, and lies about people that are alive today, right now, with modern technology documenting so much.
Anonymous No.17899156 >>17899193
>>17899144
It matters because you can't make shit up when everyone knows who you are talkin about and anyone can just go there to confirm

No one questioned the existence of Jesus because anyone can just walk over there to visit his empty grave

Also, the same Pharisees who executed him are still alive then and were still alive when the temple was destroyed, confirming Jesus' prophecy
Anonymous No.17899193 >>17899461
>>17899156
>It matters because you can't make shit up when everyone knows who you are talkin about and anyone can just go there to confirm
Yes you can. What? That happens literally all the time in the real world. I can think of numerous instances I've personally seen and experienced of people making shit up about other people and spreading rumors that were widely believed or at least tentatively discussed since childhood.

>No one questioned the existence of Jesus
Because there were many wandering religious whackos around in those days and even people who supposedly could perform magic; Jesus wouldn't have been a very exceptional figure to random Romans who already believe in magic and gods and whatnot. Even if Jesus was definitely real and definitely performed miracles, that wouldn't mean that Christianity is true or that he was the son of a Jewish storm god. He may have just been a wizard.

>because anyone can just walk over there to visit his empty grave
He didn't have a grave. The Romans disposed of the bodies of cruxifiction victims only after they had substantially rotted, and they put them in anonymous ditches. Even if there was a grave that was supposedly his, there's no way to know it was actually his, no way to know if he was really put inside of it, and even if there was a body in it, there's no guarantee it'd be identifiable as not his.

>Also, the same Pharisees who executed him are still alive then and were still alive when the temple was destroyed
Where is the definitive evidence of this?
Anonymous No.17899319
>>17892539
So if an axe murderer asked you where your family was hiding you'd just let him know right away? Seems about right.
Anonymous No.17899461
>>17899193
No, Pilate can just arrest you for defamation

Christianity started right at ground zero - right at the tomb. And the Pharisees coped by saying that they stole the body and stole the corpse (lul)

>Where is the definitive evidence of this?
They were literally among the commanders during the Great Jewish Revolt. Josephus wrote about it and oral tradition says that their heads got smashed onto the temple walls
Anonymous No.17900324
>>17892108 (OP)
>CE
>Christian Era
Simon Salva !tMhYkwTORI No.17900337
>>17892108 (OP)

>Lust-provoking image

Off yourself.
Anonymous No.17900365 >>17900412
>>17899072
>Neither do Indians, Chinese, or Japanese. The majority of people alive are not Christian.
But those people don't control academia. Jews do.
Anonymous No.17900366
>>17892108 (OP)
its just BC/AD but without being christian because using jesus as the reference date rustles their jimmies
Anonymous No.17900376
>>17892108 (OP)
On the one hand, BCE and CE are trying to secularwash something that is still of Christian origins. On the other hand, to use BC and AD would be to not only acknowledge it's based on Jesus but also to call him Christ and Lord, which I don't want to do as a non-Christian. I propose we keep BCE and CE but change them to stand for Before Christian Epoch and Christian Epoch.
Anonymous No.17900412 >>17900417
>>17900365
Most academics are Marxist Atheists. Even the Jews. Except math people who tend to be Platonists.
Anonymous No.17900417 >>17900421
>>17900412
100 percent of people who suffer from autism spectrum disorder are retards who like to generalize and fit people into categories that don't actually exist.
Anonymous No.17900421 >>17900422
>>17900417
OK but why did you describe yourself?
Anonymous No.17900422
>>17900421
Perfect (as per usual)
Anonymous No.17900772
>>17892108 (OP)
our guy agrees
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDsheyTtK6k
Anonymous No.17900789 >>17900823
For some reason "Common Era" sounds way cooler to me, Anno Domini sounds like cringe Latin LARP shit
Anonymous No.17900823 >>17900826
>>17900789
*Christ Era :^)
Anonymous No.17900826 >>17900830 >>17900904
>>17900823
According to most modern scholars, Jesus was likely not born in 1 BC or 1 AD, this was a miscalculation by Dionysius Exiguus over 500 years after the fact, modern scholars believe Jesus was born several years prior to 1 BC, which actually makes the whole "BC" thing kind of inaccurate in and of itself
Anonymous No.17900830 >>17900843 >>17900845
>>17900826
It is based on Traditional Calculation which believes that great spiritual leaders die at the same time they were born

Jesus died during the passover of 33AD
Which landed in March
Therefore, the Annunciation happened in March
Add 9 months and you get Dec 25, 1AD

It is not "inaccurate". It just didn't care about the Roman census, but about Tradition.
Anonymous No.17900836 >>17900842
Nearly every single day of the week is named after a Pagan God
It's currently Odin's Day
Tomorrow it'll be Thors' Day
Then Friggs day
Then Saturn's Day
Then Sun day and Moon Day and so forth
Two of our months are named after Roman Emperors (although to be fair this is justified under based superior Duodecimal Calendar Reform)
The point is that our epochs, and what we use to name dates, is entirely arbitrary, even by Christard standards. The whole "We do it because of Jesus!" thing is just hollow posturing and virtue signaling in the face of any real scrutiny
Anonymous No.17900842 >>17900862
>>17900836
Yes, correct.
The question isn't why we use Christ on the dates

The question is, why he is the only one people complain about
Anonymous No.17900843 >>17900904
>>17900830
>who cares if its accurate or the truth
>we've believed it for a long time for no reason so its real
How very faithful
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17900845
>>17900830
You mean die at the same time they were conceived?
Anonymous No.17900853
>>17899082
Stay mad edomite.
Anonymous No.17900862
>>17900842
Exactly, the hate this one man gets pushed me to read up on him, now I believe. Jesus really is powerful and it pisses off the basement dwellers here that people still flock to this Jesus hahahaha
Anonymous No.17900904
>>17900826
>>17900843
No. Using the Roman Census is a common misconception

The common belief among critics is that gospel of Luke speaks about the census forcing Mary and Joseph to go to Bethlehem. But the Census of Quirinuis happened in 6AD.
Therefore, Jesus must have been born after 6AD.

This, however, is false because
1. Census of Quirinuis calls for "census of the world"
2. It doesn't require people to return to their hometowns
3. Luke never mentioned "whole world" but just "whole land" which is a word he used to refer to the famine that struck Judea in Acts

Therefore, it is more likely that Jesus was born BEFORE 6AD

We don't really know the exact date, but Luke's accuracy is praised by every historian. It is ill advised to assume that he made any mistake
Anonymous No.17900932 >>17901020
>>17892108 (OP)
It's common because it's the more common accounting of time
Anonymous No.17900948
>>17892535
nuh huh
Anonymous No.17900962
>>17892108 (OP)
It's Christ's Era and Before Christ's Era, simple as
Anonymous No.17900998
>>17893187
Peak schizophrenia
Anonymous No.17901020
>>17893187
Wrong, everyone I know is turning to religion, except basement dwelling nerds with very little outside contact besides their tranny friends.>>17893202
>>17900932
Stay mad kikes, there will be BILLIONS of Christians dancing over your graves soon enough. Let me guess, you're all nerds with tranny friends