>>7688734
You have completely unrealistic standards for women. This isn't a jab, it's just a thing with stuff made to sell a thing will always attempt to pick the thing that appeals to the widest audience. It's the same thing as the problem of averages, where the average almost always does not exist.
The amount of women with the ye olde americana ideal wide hips and hourglass figure has always been very low. They get photographed or go into model work/cosplay/porn because it happens that they can make it work. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but it does color how we perceive things that are hot. Hell, I won't pretend alot of my characters don't fall into this category too, but I can acknowledge the fact that this isn't really that common IRL.
Most women out there are basically straight down with very slight hip/waist curvature and kinda wide shoulders. It's kind of always been like this. You can go outside, to the mall, the store, etc and see this. Even girls with soft cute faces are generally gonna be fairly straightened out shape wise.
It's not even really saying anything about society or whatever, humans are alot less beautiful/varied than we think they are. The internet makes us stupid, etc.
>>7688619
Yeah, that's more or less gonna be right. the outlier is the weightlifter lady because you actually REALLY need the body fat and mass to do that properly on a high level. Still, there are subtle differences in how the muscles are formed and trained with the other girls.
>>7688739
almost exclusively in western cultures, mind. And not every european influenced country has the same ideas. Hell, Asian cultures had wildly different beauty standards until western influences came in and created a bit of a clash.
