>>64109456 (OP)
I actually disagree. I've been into guns for a long time and from my vantage point I think the industry has been constantly evolving and changing. Yes certain calibers and styles of guns have become very common but there is still plenty of variety if you know where to look.
When I was first getting into guns 15 years ago there were still earnest debates about AKs vs ARs, Glocks Vs 1911s, 9mm vs 40 vs 45. A lot of that has more or less been settled and the market has spoken. ARs won, Glock won, 9mm won. Even so there has been plenty of change leading to that. Looking back at the changes in the industry we have the explosion of CC and the development of compact guns, then micro 380s and now micro 9s. We have gucci glocks and everything that went into those which now inform the styling and feature set of most brand new polymer striker fired guns. There was the explosion of optics and now guns are designed no only with mounting them as an option but with optics being factored into the design of the gun itself. We have the emergence of things like ports, comps, stippling, and magwell flares as standard features from the manufacturer. In the past few years we've seen 2011s really gaining traction in the market.
>But waaaahhhh no one's making all metal framed pistols anymore (yes they are) and no one's making hammer fired guns anymore (yes they are) and no one's making guns in .40 anymore (okay boomer)
And that's just pistols. In the rifle world yes, it is dominated by ARs but again there is plenty of variety if you know where to look. There are piston ARs, there are SCARs and SCAR knock offs like the Bren 10. There's the BRN180, Springfield Armory makes a fucking bullpup. There are more varieties of AKs available right now than when I was first getting into guns, they're just more expensive now.
>But waaaahhhh everything is an AR (no it isn't) and everything takes Pmags (that's bad why?) and no one makes battle rifles with wood anymore (okay boomer)