>>64113397
Dude the point is that things like 380, 40, 45, etc. would be more affordable if there were no sanctions on ammo from Russia and China. More affordable ammo = more consumer demand for those guns. You're using ATF logic where they'll ban something that's popular, and then argue that there's no demand for the thing that they already banned since it's not in common use anymore. Saying "the market favored XYZ after we banned everything else" doesn't prove anything other than the fact that the consumers lost options.
