>>23419480
>psycho jammer
It's on the Rozen Zulu, who use INCOM.
I'm talking about the UNICORN and specifically the FUNNELS HIJACKING.
If you can't follow a point so simple and obvious, just concede.
>ONE countermeasure
We are up to THREE: jamming, hacking, and yourself mentioned the need to extra shield your own Newtype against funnel.
Not counting unreliable gimmick.
>I don't see what your point is.
Do you see yours?
Your point was to defend funnels as "making MS pointless".
We've since deconstructed that arguments as:
- needing rare/costly newtype or unstable cybernewtype (the majority are crazy)
- subject to hacking/jamming once the enemy know they have to put money into this.
No one ever disagreed funnels are a useful edge as long as no one have a systematic counter to it.
>just head back to your ship
Why did you leave if your (long range) funnels/bits had no need for projection/recharge?
Also your huge ship is getting destroyed because it didn't have enough MS and Newtype trained for MS combat once the funnels are jammed/hijacked.
>How is putting your best ranged options on a CQC unit minimizing loss?
Because "MS combat" is the only way you'll fight/survive if someone counter your funnels.
>What is suggesting they would be able to make Newtype Jammers common in the first place?
What is suggesting they would be able to make Psycommu weapon common in the first place?
You are the one pushing to make it cost-effective to have common NT jammer.
Aside, NT jammer would also negate using Newtype as radar.
>pride is an easy thing to manipulate
Equally easy to lose control of
...out of overconfidence you could manipulate your own 'dumb' cybernewtype.
>you're talking about magic as if I said they can do Axis Shock on command
>concept
>weaponizes their connections
>more controlled version of that
Do you even read yourself? You talk of it like magic.
Also by Narrative they actually do Axis Shock on command, part of the "mankind is not ready" narrative.