>>17864088
Here's what I'd do if I was teleported to Tudor england:
>Promise to cure Henrys ulcerated leg.
Do it with basic shit like alcohol. This would immediately get me in his good graces. Knowing Henry: generous patronage.
>Create a laboratory in my new estate and use it to "invent" basic shit like: steam mine shaft pumps (Newcomen engine).
>Us the proceeds to fund my own regiment (lords could do this at that time). Implement basic infantry training and ruthless total war strategies, back in those days infantry did "drill" but not not small unit tactics, also there were seasons and times you would fight. I would implement a 24 hour non-stop battle strategy.
>implement modern war tactics
Dispersed formations, shooting lying down, rifled muskets (4x the range), cap-lock guns (3x reload speeds), impact grenades (via vacuum pump ignition), shot-guns (for close quarter fighting), and
always drawing in other armies into horrific urban/mountain/forest ambush battles, or close in shotgun/grenade battles.
>invent canning
shoving food into wine bottles and then boiling it so you troops can march on campaign without foraging.
>buy horses emasse and create mobile dragoon units
dragoons are infantry who use horse for high mobility. Use it make effect range 40 miles per day (instead of 20).
>Create explosive "shrapnel" rounds for cannons, rifle the cannons, bring in logarithmic sights for direct fire.
Basically what I'm saying is have a 1860s army in the 1500s, and then use it to march on London and kill Henry and make myself lord protector of England.
>to be cont....

>>40780007
Heaven vs hell is trap. It's better to try and escape this prison realities retribution cycles. BUT if you have no choice better to choose heaven then hell. That said left hand Satanists come in two types:
a)atheists who just want to fuck with virtuous people and tear them down thinking it will elevate themselves (so your typical woke leftist satanist is this).
b)certain occultists who know accessing source isn't technically dependent on morality, but the issue is: it makes it unnecessarily harder to achieve and second if you don't succeed (and most don't) it's a one way ticket to a hell realm.
If I remember Aryan cosmology it's not that hard to get into heaven, I think the minimum was trying to be good, respect people you have responsibility for and not enjoying quarreling (so basically no /pol/tard is going to heaven lol).

>>212857221
If you hate SuperGunn it's because you're pro-Jewish.
The reason the movie is getting so much hate is it's anti-zionism/(((anti-billionare))) message. Claiming to be pro-Snyderverse (which no is IRL) is just for plausible deniability. And as for Indians, they're allies of Israel, the whole Hamas war started to stop a trade alliance between indian/saudis/India to undercut the Chinese trade monopoly with Europe. So of course they're pro-Isreal.

>>212834770
The reason Superman 2025 is getting so much hate & derision is because it is anti-Israel and anti-Jewish narrative.
That's why it's being more debated then even Last Jedi and Captain Marvel.

>>28512697
>Redneck
An aggressive dick who will get on your ass even when youre going 20 miles over the speed limit. But will get out of your way as soon as there is an opening.
>Black
Is an obnoxious driver because he thinks "not giving a fuck" (being petulant) is cool. But the silver lining is: he draws the attention of all cops, so if your vaping or drinking, having him in the area is a God sent.
>Women
Does stuff like back into traffic, or take 10 minutes to park or goes 30mph in 45 zone because she's scared, or waits endlessly at a stop sign. None of this is inherently bad. Is it cowardly and stupid? yes. Is it bad? no.
>Asian
FOB Asians are the same as women, they do the same stuff like drive slow in the left lane cause they scared.
>Liberals
Passive aggressive AF. Will do stuff like slowly speed up to the speed limit and purposely miss lights just to make you stuck behind them. But they're easily defeated since they assume you'll follow the rules like they do, if you quickly speed around them it's game over for them.
>Latinx
They're like a mix of part black (less obvious) and part woman drivers.
>Midlife crisis
Same shit as the redneck except with a shitty mid "sports car".
>Rich kid
Same behavior as the black
>Indian/Muslim
An amalgam of shitty traits of all of the other groups combined into one.

>>81771673
Here's how it'll realistically happen (no autistic alt-history wish fulfillment shit nor seething brownskin fantasies):
>Cause of WW3
Modern governments are too bureaucratic and cowardly to go full bore so it'll be caused by a MASSIVE POWER VACUUM that forces them into action (most likely Russia collapsing into warlords drawing in NATO vs China.)
>S. America will be neutral
They gain nothing so they won't join.
>Africa
Some existing conflicts (like Sudan) might join the larger war. But other then that it'll be a side show of a side show.
>S Asia/Turkey
Will basically stay neutral occasionally seizing some small territory or bases for their own gain (claiming it's to help a side)
>Middle east
Expect bastardized clusterfuck alliances to form, like Israel+Azeris+Saudis vs Iran+Armenia+ISIS with endless indecisive wars that go nowhere.
>SEA
Will try to avoid the war at all costs. Although air/sea/island battles will happen all around them
>Central Asia
Will be neutral but basically Chinas bitch
>Eastern Europe
Poland/Finland/Ukraine will do 95% of the European theaters fighting
>West Europe
Will send minor token forces but will act like they're major contributors
>Anglo-sphere
95% of the fighting they do will be air/sea superiority and taking far flung Chinese/Russian islands/bases. Won't actually contribute that much tactically BUT will give NATO forces most their supplies money.
>China
Will funnel troops to prop up Russia/N. Korea. Essentially fighting a massive border war.
>S. Korea
Will be Verdun 2.0 static war that goes nowhere with horrendous losses.
>Japan
Like Europe will send token forces. N Korea will bomb the shit out of it to get cheap morale victories.
>Taiwan
China will attempt to blockade it. After US breaks the blockade China will bomb the shit out of it.
>Conclusion
It'll be static war with nothing much gained ending in ceasefire.

>>81680761
That's because during the Clinton-Bush era Canada actually had some things that were superior to the US. But since then the US has either gotten better (telecommunications) or Canada has gotten worse (healthcare). But boomers act like it's still 2006.
Canada's economy actually did ok during the great recession that's how strong it used to be. But years of bureaucratic bloat, zoning laws, "degrowth" policies, price controls, fuck tons of red tape, tons of unskilled immigrants lowing the value of workers, money printing, etc, the Economy has stagnating for decades. If Trump tarrifs Canada it's basically game over.

>>81523808
It's a latent homosexual desire to fuck men. You are a homo.