>>715541975
>. Does the core functioning of the game matter?
its possible to do this. several GAAS games have been able to convert with no big 200 gorillion dollar expenses. stop peddling bullshit.

>>714831593
>, it takes a tremendous amount of resources to get it to a level where it can be distributed to end users (because it was never meant to be used that way).
and this was a game that was such a net negative to the studio, it nearly killed WB. and they still found time and money to turn off all the microtransaction bullshit. so fuck you.

>>714817851
>>714817473
>DUDE ITS LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE ITS SO BAKED INTO THE GAME!!!!

Explain how WB were able to turn this massive failure of a game into a SP experience?

So why is it fun if you play captain boomerang