>>529217998
>I just don't like though how they have this unavoidable close range attack
another thing is that if you destroy all the arms their melee swipes do no damage, and their charge by itself does very little since most of the damage comes from them swiping at you during it

Reminder that a fleshmob without arms can only damage you with its charge attack, which without any arms barely does damage to you. You can also stun it during a charge and it will lose tracking, and while breaking a head does trigger a frenzy attack even if it is stunned, it won't track you during that frenzy.

>>528116686
>Maybe I'm talking out of my ass with the arms part, actually. Does it reduce the effectiveness of their sperg flailing?
yes, with no arms only their charge attack can do damage to you (and it's not that much without an arm swipe to tag you as part of the charge)

>>527786904
I sure hope you actually read and understood that the greentext items were things they could add to make felshmobs better designed and not claims of actual current behaviour.

As for everything else, there's only 1 minor correction needed, otherwise it's all true. With all of its arms destroyed it will still try to swipe at you but only its charge attack can do damage; without arms its normal swipes will do no damage.