Search Results
7/24/2025, 2:23:28 AM
7/18/2025, 3:32:45 AM
7/16/2025, 6:25:24 AM
>>81845434
>atheistfags believe a salamander-dildo is their ancient grandfather yet still make fun of christfags
>atheistfags believe a salamander-dildo is their ancient grandfather yet still make fun of christfags
7/14/2025, 4:14:12 AM
7/3/2025, 2:29:19 PM
7/2/2025, 2:25:09 PM
7/2/2025, 8:57:31 AM
6/29/2025, 6:56:25 AM
6/27/2025, 4:26:14 AM
>>508838250
How much longer can this possibly go on? No, seriously. You can't possibly drag it out forever at this point, you can literally feel the momentum. Just fucking do it, what are you fucking doing?
How much longer can this possibly go on? No, seriously. You can't possibly drag it out forever at this point, you can literally feel the momentum. Just fucking do it, what are you fucking doing?
6/25/2025, 1:10:10 AM
YOU KNOW WHAT THE REAL FUCKING PROBLEM WITH THIS TOWN IS? ABSOLUTELY EVERYONE HERE IS A STUPID LAZY PUSSY. THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO RAN AWAY FROM PARADISE, RAN AWAY FROM THE RICHEST HUB CITIES ON EARTH BECUASE THEIR SHITTY DECISIONS FUCKED IT ALL UP. NOW THEY'RE ALL HERE, FUCKING EVERYTHING UP BECAUSE THEY'RE TOO SHITTY TO CARE. NO ONE CARES ABOUT THIS TOWN BECAUSE NOBODY IS FROM HERE AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO MOVE HERE ARE LAZY COWARDS FROM OTHER PLACES TOO LAZY AND COWARDLY TO KEEP THE BEST CITIES ON EARTH FROM COLLAPSING
FUCK LITERALLY EVERYONE WHOSE MOVED TO AUSTIN, TX IN THE LAST 15 NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU IS WORTH A SHIT AND THE ENTIRE STATE OF TEXAS WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU WERE ALL BACK IN YOUR OWN SHITHOLES
FUCK LITERALLY EVERYONE WHOSE MOVED TO AUSTIN, TX IN THE LAST 15 NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU IS WORTH A SHIT AND THE ENTIRE STATE OF TEXAS WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU WERE ALL BACK IN YOUR OWN SHITHOLES
6/23/2025, 7:49:49 PM
Do these places have any real staying power? I can see people going in for the novelty of it or if you work nearby maybe dropping in every now and again. Are people really going to these places repeatedly to pay so much when they could buy the same packs of ramen and toppings and just have a stockpile of it.
One of my local asian stores started offering the service but it's attached to a cafe that serves cooked foods and drinks too.
One of my local asian stores started offering the service but it's attached to a cafe that serves cooked foods and drinks too.
6/15/2025, 11:56:35 PM
>>63839786
>AIslop voiceover
>Background gameplay footage
The bar is already subterranean.
>1:04
Mention of 10th century Chinese fire lance, picture of 14th century European hand cannon.
>1:08
Fire lances were "flamethrowers" in the same way that roman candles are. Might want to clarify that.
>1:48
You completely ignored gonnes and hand gonnes and skipped all the way to late medieval heavy cannon.
>2:09
Arquebus calibers ran all the way from ~0.4" to 2".
>2:20
Matchlocks did not "become" impractical; the downsides you mentioned always existed. You also didn't mention the serpentine; which is generally considered the first point at which you can say that a firearm is operated by a trigger.
>2:25
You ignored the snaphaunce, the miquelet, the doglock and the fucking wheellock. Flintlocks didn't magically appear out of nowhere.
>2:29
Flintlocks were around for a century before the Charleville patterns and the 1717 pattern was also a true flintlock.
>2:40
Awful terminology, lack of detail
>2:56
Rifling had been experimented with since the end of the 15th century and was common in high-end sporting arms during the 16th.
>3:04
Implication that the Kentucky rifle was the first rifled firearm. Wildly incorrect, especially since they were introduced to the colonies by German gunsmiths working in an established tradition. The calibers also varied all the way from ~.25 to ~.60.
>3:21
The Baker was adopted in 1800.
>3:23
That's a photograph from the 20th century.
You know what, I've seen enough. My final score is kill yourself/10.
>AIslop voiceover
>Background gameplay footage
The bar is already subterranean.
>1:04
Mention of 10th century Chinese fire lance, picture of 14th century European hand cannon.
>1:08
Fire lances were "flamethrowers" in the same way that roman candles are. Might want to clarify that.
>1:48
You completely ignored gonnes and hand gonnes and skipped all the way to late medieval heavy cannon.
>2:09
Arquebus calibers ran all the way from ~0.4" to 2".
>2:20
Matchlocks did not "become" impractical; the downsides you mentioned always existed. You also didn't mention the serpentine; which is generally considered the first point at which you can say that a firearm is operated by a trigger.
>2:25
You ignored the snaphaunce, the miquelet, the doglock and the fucking wheellock. Flintlocks didn't magically appear out of nowhere.
>2:29
Flintlocks were around for a century before the Charleville patterns and the 1717 pattern was also a true flintlock.
>2:40
Awful terminology, lack of detail
>2:56
Rifling had been experimented with since the end of the 15th century and was common in high-end sporting arms during the 16th.
>3:04
Implication that the Kentucky rifle was the first rifled firearm. Wildly incorrect, especially since they were introduced to the colonies by German gunsmiths working in an established tradition. The calibers also varied all the way from ~.25 to ~.60.
>3:21
The Baker was adopted in 1800.
>3:23
That's a photograph from the 20th century.
You know what, I've seen enough. My final score is kill yourself/10.
Page 1