>>106024255
Yikes. Patch 1.2 did fuck all to improve the performance of that game btw.

>>105742725
>should I buy 5070 super or 5070 ti super when it comes out?
Aim for the best video card you can afford as long as the price/performance makes sense.
If you want to dabble in local AI hobbies, the rumored 5070 Ti Super's higher VRAM is better.

>>105742743
I doubt it, are they running at 3200MT/s or higher?

>>105742804
If the rumors are true, it's a big change in how NVIDIA specs their -70 & -80 series cards.
What will be the memory specs of the launch 6070, 6070 Ti, and 6080? I can imagine a 6080 having 20~24GB VRAM.
But I'm not sure if NVIDIA wants to permanently provide 18 & 24GB VRAM for the -70 and -70 Ti cards.

>>105743134
Oblivion is mostly software bottlenecked, the people at Virtuous and Bethesda have to release a performance patch.

>Microcenter has a $400 bundle that seems reasonable.
Does it provide 32GB memory? decent deal.

>>105671212
This guy is just so pathetic, always citing old problems, always reverting to broken games' performance.
The devs admitted they needed to release a performance patch for that mess.

>>105663900
>5070 ti on oblivion status?
>Microsoft-owned game studio prioritized AMD hardware optimization
How is this news? Same story just like Starfield developed with Radeon partnership.
Bethesda had to prioritize pushing a DLSS3 (+FG) support patch for Starfield because the outcry from NVIDIA owners was too much to delay.