>>212974075
>What has always amazed me is how the members of the rainbow coalition don't see the cheap pandering for what it is.
Oh, brother. You're so naive. This is the rainbow coalition extracting its tribute. It's not a "oh, this is lame corporate pandering". It's a "we own this now, bitch". It's them showing to the world that this intellectual property now belongs to them.
It wasn't about representation for a long time now. The queers demand things be made all about them. That's why this troon >>212973483 is upset that NuTrek is not wasting precious screentime on exploring NuChapel's bisexuality.

>>212835798
Tankie Trek lost. Millions must rewatch TNG.

>>212380631
>>212380813
NuTrek is over. Your screeching is more impotent than ever. You've been crashing out since the SNW news broke.
Let me explain the reality of your situation clearly: NuTrek is over and canceled (the only new show in active development is a series of YouTube Shorts), new company is taking over Paramount very soon (despite you claiming repeatedly that Paramount is doing well and won't be acquired), they may or may not shelf SNW S5 and two seasons of SFA they already shot, and the NuTrek era is effectively forgotten. Everyone is eager to endlessly talk about TNG and you're pissing and shitting your pants because you can't deal with the fact that people would rather discuss thirty year old shows over your slop. And it's new people coming in every day. New fans are discovering the old Trek shows. They're certainly not watching the new stuff. So what you do? You waste your time spamming threads with slop nobody watched, nobody wants to talk about, slop nobody even remembers. There's no scenario where you win here, you're just wasting your time. The conversations and threads will continue and you won't be around enough to keep shitting them up.

Geezer Trek wins again.

>>211993095