>>96171907
Yes, I also ran a game with it and it was blast. I also had one where the units could go through terrain and tanks were just rolling and it was just fun. Most people just shy away from it from my LGS.
>>96172140
I started with GSC last year but the word on the street is that it's a difficult army to play the game with, is expensive and a bitch to paint so it's definitely something that a newcomer should stay away from. I just liked the lore and went with it.

>>96107448
I actually prefer the latest version to the previous ones because at least you know if you're getting your lads back. In the codex you rolled a 2 and suddenly you don't have an army rule, like nothing. Index version was OP as fuck, you always got your battleline back but the points were higher.

>>95930215
https://youtu.be/QBu3e8jZDEc?si=EHaxmHn0AuXp11-6

>>95850476
I'm a newfag and it's my first time building these lads but I hate how monopose they are, even the tactical pipes are the same in case I decide to get a 2nd batch. I'm gonna field them in my GSC army as Purestrains and the GSC build options are really amazing, and borrowing stuff from Tyranid shows the contrast between the two.
But yeah they're clearly different from the old ones. These ones also don't have those fleshy bits on their backs