>>716091009

Try it, bitch.

Both

H-Hey guys maybe you shouldn't buy games that are unfair to you, will close or consoles that will block anyways...

> /v/: REEE HOW DARE YOU, HOW FUCKING DARE YOU TELL ME NOT TO CONSUME!? IT IS MY RIGHT TO SPEND MY MOM'S MONEY ON VIDEOGAMES AND THE NEW NINTENDO SWITCH!!

Why /v/tards get so angry when they are told not to consume...

>>714759292

Wouldn't you find it hypocritical if i said i'm part of the STOP KILLING LEMONADE STANDS association but then i run to your lemonade stand and do everything i can to sabotage it and cheer on your lemonade stand closing?

I really don't get that whole initiative.
> This game with 0 players left i bought 20 years ago should actually KEEP ITS SERVERS OPENS and STILL KEEP GETTING UPDATES!

Do these retards just want the underpaid overworked game developers to slave away forever on a game they want to move on from?

I'd bet $99999999 trillion dollars that everyone who supports Stop Killing Games laughed at Concord failing.
The stupid thing that inspired the whole stop killing games was an irrelevant garbage dead old car game but Concord, a new release lots of people worked in that closed within a day didn't get not even an inch of push back.

I don't have money to buy videogames...