>>513956985
>the theory replaced yours 70 years ago
You keep declaring shit without evidence. As if it coming out of your fucking mouth is proof enough. Even the examples you provide(Ireland) prove my argument, not yours.

>thus, my comparison of adding 1% more labor to the economy vs. adding 1% more productivity per worker is particularly apt, in a way it wouldn't be in a developing economy.
The point I'm making is, finance distorts everything. Western economies are really just crypto-schemes supported by the dollar, the US military, and the lack of alternatives. Furthermore, since Europe has no resources, without a constant infusion of foreign capital, everything would collapse.

The reason Europe is absolutely cucked is because it has no choice. Without Russian gas, there is no Germany industry. And without German industry, there is no Europe.

>>513541037
True. But that's mostly a nationalist thing. It has nothing to do with feelings of being white.

Basically, they see it more like, by defeating the Germans, they proved they were superior to Germans(who supposedly claimed to be superior to them). This of course is a confusion because that perception is based on a Jewish version of history.

>>23141604
True. But that's mostly a nationalist thing. It has nothing to do with feelings of being white.

Basically, they see it more like, by defeating the Germans, they proved they were superior to Germans(who supposedly claimed to be superior to them). This of course is a confusion because that perception is based on a Jewish version of history.

>>513473201
>You claim you are trying to "save Europe" by cheering for a Russian victory.
1) I'm not cheering for a Russian victory.
2) America would be a weak shithole if not for its vast resources. The reason Britain won WWII was because of America's vast resources. The reason the Soviets were able to outproduce the Germans was because of their vast resources. The reason Hitler refused to leave Stalingrad was because he understood the war was lost without oil from the Caucasus. If Germany had America's resources, it would have won both WWI and WWII(see Blockade of Germany and the starvation that followed).
4) The reason Europe is irrelevant is because it lost its colonies. And it lost its colonies because both America and the Soviets aided the anti-European rebels. In fact, America is 100% to blame for Europe's current plight.
5) Russia is more powerful than any NATO country except America. Moreover, Russia never claimed to be more powerful than the United States. But this is irrelevant because China will not let Russia lose, and China's industrial capacity is greater than all the West combined.

>Your deeper ideological claim is that Russia is a bastion against the demographic "genocide" of Europe.
I never said that. I said Europe is completely helpless without Russian resources. Moreover, Russia needs Europe. If Europe is to be saved, Russian resources have to be wedded to European manpower under a centralized state that cannot be divide and conquered.

This is a fact.

>>512680864
You're either retarded or a kike. Hard to tell.

>>510882825
>>510883039
To put it simply, there is no contradiction between being a Nazi and supporting Putin. Because Nazism, or anything else, is pointless without power. Like, even if Ukraine was led by an actual Hitler instead of a kike, it wouldn't do anything because Ukraine has no power.

Power, nigger. That is what matters. Thus the goal is to make Europe powerful. And for Europe to be powerful, it needs to become a unified empire.

>>510089332
You're retarded.